BluesStringer
Les Brers
I wasn't going to override ignore to read this, but since shadow quoted it, my reasons for not reading it were just confirmed. You should have thanked me for linking to your first post Treo, since you lied about what you said and couldn't be bothered to go back and find it for yourself. Now to re-post it and highlight the fact that you completely and without equivocation signed onto Rich's post, even after having admitted that shadow had no other choice than to act as he did, is strange to say the least. Whatever.
You have already admitted that shadow had no other choice, so why are you repeating the same ignorant tripe as you did when even the press reports weren't reliable? Who cares what you'd do in a situation that has no relationship whatsoever to the facts of this case?
Bull$hit - It's a paper-weight. You obviously don't have the powers of discernment to know when it's appropriate and/or necessary to draw your weapon, so it's nothing more than a security blanket for people like you. For the life of me, I can't figure out why people like you and Rich even carry guns.
But this is just so much brainless blather I can hardly stand it:
While it doesn't surprise me in the least that words typed into an internet forum by strangers living hundreds, even thousands of miles away from you, "scares the Hell out of" you, I challenge you to cite one post where anyone said anything close to the equivalent of praying to God for "the chance" to get into a gunfight. One post you pusillanimous poltroon. Good luck with that. You made up what you said in your first post, and now you're making stuff up about what the rest of us have said, which is just stupid as Hell because anyone can read and see if you're truthful or a blatant liar. I'm going with the latter.
Ahh, so the subsequent corporate response to your defending your life with a gun on a corporation's property is what dictates whether or not the use of the gun is justified? Does that about cover it? The venue is irrelevant. If you're legally justified to pull the trigger because your life (or in the case of literally every CC'er I associate with, the lives of others) is being threatened, you act and let the chips fall where they may. I have no idea what "fiduciary responsibility" any reasonable CC'er would expect from Waffle House or any other corporate entity. As far as the Sheriff and DA were concerned, Mr. Harrison made a righteous shoot. Every round he fired was judged to be justified in defense of life, not of corporate interests. He can answer for himself, but if it were me under the same circumstances, I couldn't care less what Waffle House thought of my actions. I wouldn't have done it because I expected recognition or reward, or even paying for legal bills if they arise, I would've fired only because mine or others' lives were being threatened. What possible "fiduciary responsibility" would any corporation have to me for defending my own life? Good grief, your posts just get more and more insipid, which I would've said was impossible after your second one in this thread if I wasn't seeing it with my own eyes!
A distinction without a difference. Inaction while you're there, and avoidance of any and all civic duty after it's over. What a freakin' pu$$y.
Ahh, finally, something we can agree on.
I could not think any less of you, you yellow-bellied flagitious miscreant.
And then you draw attention to exactly what proves the validity of my last sentence. Unreal.
Blues
Unless no other option is open to me I’m not going to start a gunfight w/ the robber, I’ve never taken any other position in this thread or on this board ever.
You have already admitted that shadow had no other choice, so why are you repeating the same ignorant tripe as you did when even the press reports weren't reliable? Who cares what you'd do in a situation that has no relationship whatsoever to the facts of this case?
My gun is strictly a defensive weapon;
Bull$hit - It's a paper-weight. You obviously don't have the powers of discernment to know when it's appropriate and/or necessary to draw your weapon, so it's nothing more than a security blanket for people like you. For the life of me, I can't figure out why people like you and Rich even carry guns.
But this is just so much brainless blather I can hardly stand it:
I do not carry to bring evil doers to justice and the fact that some of you seem to think the mere fact that you have a permit and a gun obligates you to engage the robber scares the Hell out of me. Your CHP does not make you a super hero you are not the guardian of society. After reading some of your posts I really, really, believe that some of you strap up every day praying to God for a chance to be a hero.
While it doesn't surprise me in the least that words typed into an internet forum by strangers living hundreds, even thousands of miles away from you, "scares the Hell out of" you, I challenge you to cite one post where anyone said anything close to the equivalent of praying to God for "the chance" to get into a gunfight. One post you pusillanimous poltroon. Good luck with that. You made up what you said in your first post, and now you're making stuff up about what the rest of us have said, which is just stupid as Hell because anyone can read and see if you're truthful or a blatant liar. I'm going with the latter.
I want no part of it. I said it before and I’ll say it again; if you get your ass shot off playing boy wonder Waffle House is going to disavow your actions (and any fiduciary responsibility) so fast you won’t know what hit you.
Ahh, so the subsequent corporate response to your defending your life with a gun on a corporation's property is what dictates whether or not the use of the gun is justified? Does that about cover it? The venue is irrelevant. If you're legally justified to pull the trigger because your life (or in the case of literally every CC'er I associate with, the lives of others) is being threatened, you act and let the chips fall where they may. I have no idea what "fiduciary responsibility" any reasonable CC'er would expect from Waffle House or any other corporate entity. As far as the Sheriff and DA were concerned, Mr. Harrison made a righteous shoot. Every round he fired was judged to be justified in defense of life, not of corporate interests. He can answer for himself, but if it were me under the same circumstances, I couldn't care less what Waffle House thought of my actions. I wouldn't have done it because I expected recognition or reward, or even paying for legal bills if they arise, I would've fired only because mine or others' lives were being threatened. What possible "fiduciary responsibility" would any corporation have to me for defending my own life? Good grief, your posts just get more and more insipid, which I would've said was impossible after your second one in this thread if I wasn't seeing it with my own eyes!
I never said I’d run out during the robbery (I’m a coward remember? Why draw attention to myself?) What I said was afterwards if I can get out that back door w/out interacting w/ the police I’m on it like Jillian Michaels on a fat chick.
A distinction without a difference. Inaction while you're there, and avoidance of any and all civic duty after it's over. What a freakin' pu$$y.
Maybe there’s a weakness in my breeding
Ahh, finally, something we can agree on.
And if Blue String (or anyone else) thinks less of me because of that, I’m Ok w/ it.
I could not think any less of you, you yellow-bellied flagitious miscreant.
FWIW here is my OP
And the one where I said I'd slip out the back door
And then you draw attention to exactly what proves the validity of my last sentence. Unreal.
Blues