Will he carry 1 In the chamber NOW??

I love how those jackholes writing the article just casually mention how Rodriguez served two "military" tours to Iraq.

I'm getting really tired of the media perpetrating combat veterans as timing time bombs. Odds are really high that most "combat veterans" you meet never actually saw any combat
 
As far as this very well trained AND highly skilled C-3 gunman is concerned, another individual has to be one world-class internet gun bozo before he goes, ‘on the air’ to so loudly proclaim that his C-1 gun handling skills and interpersonal confrontational techniques are so much better than anybody else’s preferred method of C-3 carry. The undisputable fact is that C-3 carry has saved, and continues to save, countless civilian and military lives - The only thing that isn’t certain is exactly how many lives C-3 carry has saved; however, on a worldwide scale, the number of souls who’ve been able to avoid serious mishap because of using a C-3 semiautomatic sidearm has to be quite large.

Military carries C1...C3 on the battlefield will get you killed
 
I love how those jackholes writing the article just casually mention how Rodriguez served two "military" tours to Iraq.

I'm getting really tired of the media perpetrating combat veterans as timing time bombs. Odds are really high that most "combat veterans" you meet never actually saw any combat

That was supposed to say "ticking time bombs"...stupid autocorrect
 
After reading this entire thread I felt I had to respond. First, there is no such thing as an accidental discharge. It is all NEGLIGENCE when it comes to a weapon. AD is something that happens during sex. (Different gun. I know it's confusing but lets try to keep it straight.) Second, if a person intends to do you harm, no matter the weapon they choose, they have the upper hand because they know what action they want to commit. You are REACTING and that is always slower than your aggressor. Therefore, having one "in the pipe" does not make you a cowboy or Clint Eastwood but it does make you that half a second faster and that could save your life. I would ask you to watch/read anything by MSgt Donvito (USMC Ret.) and/or Gavin DeBecker that has to do with personal defense. These two are not "gun guys" but they have a lot of insight into personal protection and what it takes to defend yourself. Most of the people here are not seeking the moment that we can draw or use our personal weapon but we are prepared for the worst case scenario. There is no "circle jerk" or personal arousal satisfaction that comes from carrying. It is merely an understanding of the potential dangers that surround us daily and accepting what we need to do to be prepared for it. For you and some others that is condition 3, for me and some others that is condition 1. Either way we are carrying a firearm in the protection of ourselves, our family and our friends in a daily basis. That is a good thing and what we rightfully have as Americans.
 
Being new to handguns, I also asked the question about carrying with 1 in the chamber. Just my lack of knowledge and inexperience. Since, I have learned that 1 in the chamber is the way to go.

As for the story, the 2 pool guys said they pulled over to call police. I believe that pulling over was their first mistake. They should have continued to drive and try to get away from the situation. One guy drives, while the passenger calls 911. I honestly think that they pulled over in order to get in to a confrontation. They probably figured 2 of them against 1 would be an easy fight. Obviously a wrong decision.
 
Funny! It's not a, 'rant' unless you happen to disagree with it, pmb61. If an instructor has students who continue to demonstrate an individual propensity for screwing up then who do you think is (really) to blame?

It most certainly is a rant when you are calling people jerks, morons and schmucks and a few other names in your post!
 
Wow! Looks like the kids have been busy while I was out of town. OK, boys and girls, I see I’ve stirred up something of a hornet’s nest among the smaller lighter minds in the group.

Still, this nonsense is worthy of some small reply. I’m not going to make a habit out of this, though, because I have previously encountered and do understand the temperament of too many, ‘plebeians with guns’; consequently, I’m only going to make one more reply in this thread. So, are you ready?

Military carries C1...C3 on the battlefield will get you killed

Ahh, you might want to check your facts. There is, to the best of my knowledge, no military service that has not, at one time or another, employed C-3 carry both in and out of battle. The only thing you can say with a degree of honesty is that C-3 carry will get YOU killed. That, however, hasn’t been true for me. I’ve been able to do just fine with it. (But, then again, unlike many of you, ‘internet gunfighting experts’ I know how!)

Thanks for the input there Mr. High and Mighty. Great writing skills. Do you write for some liberal elitist magazine or College? I see you like to mention the condition to which people carry their weapons which lends reference to your being a cop, high ranking ex-military or heck maybe you are Pennsylvania / Government congressman or worked in the Judicial system that thinks that only highly trained professionals should carry guns. Whatever the case, maybe you should keep out of site 'cause we all are carrying C-1 brother.

Hey, with the direct name calling! If I’m, ‘Mr. High and Mighty’ who are you? ‘Mr. Low and Pathetic’. (Do you, still, like my writing skills?) If you’re going to SPECIFICALLY address someone like that, be a man and do it to his face. Otherwise, shut-up!

By the way, I doubt you’ve got what it takes to be, ‘my brother’. I’ve spent a good part of my life running with lions - not dogs. It’s only on occasions like this that I have to be concerned about catching fleas.

So Arc Angel, How does someone in the fantasy world YOU live in "safely" carry a REVOLVER????

I carry older single action revolvers with 5 in the cylinder and an empty chamber under the hammer. I carry modern double action revolvers with 6 all the way around. In your enthusiasm to get in on this you have apparently forgotten that Cooper’s classification system applies strictly to semiautomatic weapons. See that! You’re obviously someone who needs to reread what I’ve said: You’re too prone to careless thinking and making mistakes.

Arc Angel you can wait on the highly trained police. You will be waiting an average of 23 minutes nationwide. I chose to carry condition one and have for over 25 years with complete safety, with carry comes great responsibility. I will also promise never to inflict my beliefs on you or your family nor will I aid or assist you in their defense, you have a cell phone you can use. Peace, Love, Colt 45, Condition 1.

What does average police response time have to do with anything I’ve said? Now are you, also, saying that you’ve been carrying a 1911 pattern, or a pretensioned striker-fired pistol around in C-1 for the past 25 years? (That would mean you are one of the very first Americans to have purchased a Glock!)

You brought it up; so I’m going to tell you: Anyone who carries a fully charged 1911 around with him all day long is an idiot. I carried 1911’s for 25 years, too. At today’s prices I’d like to have $100 dollars for every time I reached down to my side and found my tightly fitted Swenson ambi-safety clicked off! If you’ve got an active lifestyle then it’s going to happen! You tell me what will, also, happen on the draw if a gunman’s trigger finger discipline is anything less than perfect?

Sad news! You have already broken your promise by already inflicting your opinions on me. Neither do I want, or require, you to do any of my gunfighting for me. I’m perfectly competent to do all of that, myself, without any outside interference from you.

You are not dead yet, but maybe old ???? and being alive means you can still change your avocation and take up golf if that is what you want. It will be the same as saying "the higher up you go, the smaller your balls..." Go on, give up your gun, or better yet, sell it. Your life and your family's safety doesn't really mean anything to you, so why have it/them? Entertainment? Golf is better entertainment, believe me...!! for your kind anyway. Don't worry about us here...we will survive happily without you. Go join a golf forum instead. We won't miss you...and when you go, we will all celebrate and have a drink. Cheers ... Drive safely. Don't let us get in your way.

Your attempt at humor is, both, anemic and somewhat salacious. I tell you what: I won’t refer to anyone’s (well used?) vagina if you won’t refer to anyone’s balls. How’s that!

He would have someone else carry the gun ( cops ) or have one empty chamber. Need we remind him of our favorite DEA agent?

I don’t know who’s the bigger schmuck? You or Lee Paige? (Neither of whom has anything worthwhile to contribute to this topic.)

After reading this entire thread I felt I had to respond. First, there is no such thing as an accidental discharge. It is all NEGLIGENCE when it comes to a weapon. AD is something that happens during sex. (Different gun. I know it's confusing but lets try to keep it straight.) Second, if a person intends to do you harm, no matter the weapon they choose, they have the upper hand because they know what action they want to commit. You are REACTING and that is always slower than your aggressor. Therefore, having one "in the pipe" does not make you a cowboy or Clint Eastwood but it does make you that half a second faster and that could save your life. I would ask you to watch/read anything by MSgt Donvito (USMC Ret.) and/or Gavin DeBecker that has to do with personal defense. These two are not "gun guys" but they have a lot of insight into personal protection and what it takes to defend yourself. Most of the people here are not seeking the moment that we can draw or use our personal weapon but we are prepared for the worst case scenario. There is no "circle jerk" or personal arousal satisfaction that comes from carrying. It is merely an understanding of the potential dangers that surround us daily and accepting what we need to do to be prepared for it. For you and some others that is condition 3, for me and some others that is condition 1. Either way we are carrying a firearm in the protection of ourselves, our family and our friends in a daily basis. That is a good thing and what we rightfully have as Americans.

My goodness, a largely civil reply! I, almost, don’t know how to respond! Yes, Marine, I’m well aware of the Corps established policy on sidearms and their proper carry. (Maybe you should enlighten, ‘what’s his name’ who incorrectly responded above?) Now, although I wish the Marines had taught you how to use paragraphs along with guns, I’m going to try to get through the rest of your undistinguished response.

(Watch this! Here’s what I mean by, ‘paragraphs’.) Listen, my friend, while I have no intention of making a bunch of bullying close-minded gun toters any smarter than I prefer them to be, as a courtesy to you, I am going to address your question: IF a half second’s worth of response time actually makes a difference between life and death for you, then, I’m going to suggest that you’ve already made other far more serious mistakes, and have already screwed up well in advance of that, ‘pregnant moment’. (I’m writing from personal experience.)

What is more, it’s a well known fact that a vast majority of those who carry sidearms around with themselves all day long never have been, and are never going to be, in an, ‘instantaneous CQB ambush’. (You’ve got to have a night job at a liquor or convenience store before the probability for this to happen suddenly goes up.) From, ‘cradle to grave’ a vast majority of these C-1 civilians are never going to need to use a fully charged pistol instantaneously - Never!

In reference to everyday CIVILIAN carry: What so many of these C-1, ‘gun yahoos’ (It’s only an insult IF you have reason to take it personally - OK.) are actually doing is needlessly endangering: themselves, their families, their friends, and everyone else who must come into contact with them while they are carrying. When you compare the numerous risks of civilian C-1 carry to the probable likelihood of being involved in an, ‘instantaneous CQB ambush’ the presumed necessity to carry in C-1 becomes nearly infinitesimal. The risks far outweigh any conceivable advantage.

Law enforcement might - might - be an exception for C-1 carry; however, I know - or have, otherwise, heard or read about - a large number of police officers who’ve screwed up with a C-1 gun in hand, and hurt either themselves, or someone else - You’re a gun forum aficionado, right; perhaps you have, too? Now, I’d like to separate and directly address one of your final remarks:

Most of the people here are not seeking the moment that we can draw or use our personal weapon but we are prepared for the worst case scenario. There is no "circle jerk" or personal arousal satisfaction that comes from carrying. It is merely an understanding of the potential dangers that surround us daily and accepting what we need to do to be prepared for it.

You’re an older man, correct? Then you’ve lived long enough to know that there certainly is a, ‘circle jerk’ aspect to a very great deal of everyday civilian carry and firearm use. I mean, come on! I spend a lot of time on: private, commercial, and public firing lines. I see these armed and self-aggrandizing attitudes and behaviors among the general public all of the time. I further suspect you and I have, both, lived long enough to prefer to shoot on the far right side of any firing line we’re on. (You know, ‘Why’ - correct!)

It most certainly is a rant when you are calling people jerks, morons and schmucks and a few other names in your post!

The use of emotionally charged language is, both, my prerogative as well as indicative of my personal opinion; AND I stated it as such. Don’t blame me if I’ve, somehow, hit a personal chord with you. I mean, hey, your posts might seem like rants to me, too. It’s just that I don’t deliberately call them out as such.

OK, people! I’m done with this now. There ain’t no percentage in arguing with a pile of bricks. Apparently I haven’t changed any of your opinions; and, trust me on this, none of you have changed any of mine. However more articulate, better written, and more reasonable responses would have been appreciated. (‘Water from stones’, right!) :wink:
 
Arc Angel I feel left out. Maybe you could break down my dream for me. Was it really bad joojoo?

I see your points and with an open mind they make sense in a way. Common sense trumps some laws , survival trumps all.
 
Arc Angel....

So, According to YOU (living in your fantasy world) it is MORE dangerous to carry an auto_loader in condition 1 (one in pipe, safety on) Than it is to carry a modern dbl/single action pistol with all chambers loaded? WTF???? How can you even begin to come to that conclusion? (well, without being an idiot or a troll) Think about it for once dude...

An auto-loader in condition one takes more steps btwn holstered and lead flying.... 1. Unholster 2.Manipulate safety 3. Pull trigger.. Verses a Revolver, 1. Unholster 2. Pull trigger....

Yet YOU CLAIM that the revolver is safer to carry? With less steps to firing? I think you need to go back and learn some very rudimentary math.... 3>2
 
My goodness, a largely civil reply! I, almost, don’t know how to respond! Yes, Marine, I’m well aware of the Corps established policy on sidearms and their proper carry. (Maybe you should enlighten, ‘what’s his name’ who incorrectly responded above?) Now, although I wish the Marines had taught you how to use paragraphs along with guns, I’m going to try to get through the rest of your undistinguished response.

(Watch this! Here’s what I mean by, ‘paragraphs’.) Listen, my friend, while I have no intention of making a bunch of bullying close-minded gun toters any smarter than I prefer them to be, as a courtesy to you, I am going to address your question: IF a half second’s worth of response time actually makes a difference between life and death for you, then, I’m going to suggest that you’ve already made other far more serious mistakes, and have already screwed up well in advance of that, ‘pregnant moment’. (I’m writing from personal experience.)

However more articulate, better written, and more reasonable responses would have been appreciated. (‘Water from stones’, right!) :wink:



I am all for having a civil discussion about the topics presented and I presented my side of the debate without personal attack. You commented on that specifically and then proceeded to commence a personal attack. You are allowed to have an opinion and others can disagree but when you bring in personal attack people stop listening to what it is you are actually trying to get across. "It is not what you say but how you say it that matters."

We can play the scenario game all day long and I am sure you would respond with how you would have better prepared yourself by ensuring you had some distance, obstacles, etc. between you and your aggressor. That is all well and good but the point I am making is you never know what someone else is going to do. You cannot predict another persons every thought or every action and because of that, it is my opinion, that one less step (racking your slide), in a time of high stress, will put you in a more advantageous position.

There are countless stories about guys pulling the trigger over and over on an empty chamber and never even starting an immediate action because they were under stress. I consider myself very well trained in firearms use to include being under stress and if my life is put in danger, I want the fewest steps possible to defend myself.

P.S. Notice the paragraphs...
 
Military carries C1...C3 on the battlefield will get you killed

Ahh, you might want to check your facts. There is, to the best of my knowledge, no military service that has not, at one time or another, employed C-3 carry both in and out of battle. The only thing you can say with a degree of honesty is that C-3 carry will get YOU killed. That, however, hasn’t been true for me. I’ve been able to do just fine with it. (But, then again, unlike many of you, ‘internet gunfighting experts’ I know how!)
[/QUOTE]

My facts are not in dispute. I served in the US Army for over 12 years as an airborne infantryman and had multiple combat deployments. Even in training, we carried C1. Maybe you should recheck your facts, or get them from someone who has real combat experience rather than someone who was just "over there"...I'm not turning this into an MOS war (a.k.a. grunts vs. pogs), I firmly believe that everyone's job in the military has merit and contributes to the team. I'm just making a point to this jackhole
 
S&W645 said:
He would have someone else carry the gun ( cops ) or have one empty chamber. Need we remind him of our favorite DEA agent?
I don’t know who’s the bigger schmuck? You or Lee Paige? (Neither of whom has anything worthwhile to contribute to this topic.)
Look in the mirror son. You are the one who thinks cops are highly trained and nobody else should carry in locked and loaded. Same attitude as the DEA cop has in the video. Your statement was:
Just for the record: I have no problem with the police or other highly trained and equally well skilled pistoleros carrying their semiautomatic weapons in C-1. Instead, it’s C-1 gun carriers with attitudes like many of those who’ve previously responded to this thread that genuinely worry me the most.
You also slam permit/license holders but don't know them or what they went thru to get theirs. I don't know what state you are in but to get mine I did have to use a range in front of the instructor, who is a sworn police officer . But had been using the range before the license was applied for. And handling guns for about 45 years safely.
 
Hey, with the direct name calling! If I’m, ‘Mr. High and Mighty’ who are you? ‘Mr. Low and Pathetic’. (Do you, still, like my writing skills?) If you’re going to SPECIFICALLY address someone like that, be a man and do it to his face. Otherwise, shut-up!

By the way, I doubt you’ve got what it takes to be, ‘my brother’. I’ve spent a good part of my life running with lions - not dogs. It’s only on occasions like this that I have to be concerned about catching fleas.

Hmm, little man with big words, a napoleon complex and a masters in arrogance. The reason you don't run with big dogs is because you run with *******. So what is it? You a small cop with a little schwantz that was bullied in school so now you have to belittle others to feel better about yourself. An immature pencil pushing veteran c/o that didn't get to see combat and an ego as big as Nobama the fraud. Maybe your a bull dyke district attorney who was raped at gunpoint at one time in her early life?

There's nothing worse than an know it all with an attitude such as yourself and if you keep at it then very shortly you won't have anything to discuss with anyone and your time here was for not. If you want to educate people do it with out being a horses ass.
 
Wow! With the possible exception of, 'Tucker's Mom' there's not an honorable man among you.

You're all acting and reacting like a herd of gutless swine. (You're all real brave heroes on the internet though - Aren't you!)

jabatam, I don't know how the army is carrying their sidearms nowadays; but, I do know how the Marines used to carry theirs; and it was always in C-3.

Now, with my compliments, the pack of you internet gun forum cretins can piss-off.
 
Arc Angel, your attitude is a sure way to ensure no one will want to think anything you have to say is worth the price we paid to join this forum. And, you really shouldn't disparage the honor of others, after proving yourself to be less than honest yourself. You promised us you were gone, then returned to the scene of your previous diatribe. Shame, I say, shame on you!
 
Ok, I'll piss on back to my detail, it's time for my shift to start anyway. I'll have one in the pipe because that's what I believe and you can leave your chamber empty because that's what you believe. Stay safe.

P.S. I really was wanting your input on that dream. I thought it would be interesting. You're not going to hurt my feelings, I've had tough drill sergeants too. Maybe one day over some beers.
 
Unfortunately, too much of this thread comes off like a circle jerk for morons with guns; only, this time, the morons have really outdone themselves. Personally it scares the dickens out of me to think there are people like these out there, walking around freely among the general public, with C-1 pistols on their belts.

Because I don’t have to answer domestic disturbance calls, don’t have to restrain hostile drunks, or capture dopers, and don’t have to chase car thieves or bank robbers around all day long, what is the most dangerous thing I can do with a gun on my belt?

Well, ……… that would be for me to go to a public shooting range - That’s right, for me to go to a public shooting range! It’s while I’m at public shooting ranges that I, too often, seem to find myself wishing that, a lot earlier in life, I’d done something really smart like taking up golf, instead of guns, as an avocation.

I have to wonder what makes these C-1 carry gun clowns think they should be entitled to go about armed in the same manner as the police do? How many of these internet gun bozos are legitimate Police Academy graduates? How many have been rigorously trained in the skillful and proper use of a fully charged sidearm, as well as tested BEFORE being given civil license to move about in the midst of the general public while carrying an EDC pistol - Especially while that pistol is in the potentially volatile state of C-1 carry?

With the current proliferation of carry permits it's getting so that me and my C-3 pistol can't go to a public shooting range anymore without running into, at least, one of these: highly overconfident, grossly opinionated, largely unskilled, and phenomenally untalented, C-1 gun carriers - You know, just like the people who've, so far, been responding to this thread. Frankly, I get sick and tired of having to, so often, step aside and duck the carelessly pointed muzzles of so many C-1, 'gunfighter wannabees'.

The fact remains that the vast majority of these C-1 pistol carriers are as much a danger to themselves and - especially to - those around them as they might ever be to an occasional bad guy. You know whom I’m talking about, right! That bad guy most civilians go from cradle-to-grave without ever having to encounter. For THIS I’ve got to be constantly ducking other people’s muzzles and gun jams as well as putting up with these (ever popular) accidental discharges.

(What’s the very first thing the C-1 gun schmuck to the right of you on a firing line will do the moment his pistol jams? Come on, think real hard! He’ll lower that C-1 pistol; and, if he’s right-handed, he’ll point that horizontal muzzle to his left, AND DIRECTLY AT YOUR BODY, while he tries to figure out what’s wrong with his fully charged pistol! Now, who honestly believes that a C-1 gun bozo like this is going to behave any differently while he’s out on the street and moving around with the general public? I know I certainly don’t.)

To bring (what I am sure) will be only a brief moment of sanity to this subject, the road-rage incident described in this thread is not actually about a C-3 misadventure with a pistol. Instead, it’s about exactly what I’m pointing out - An astonishing failure in individual firearms training and skillful pistol handling technique; and, to a lesser degree, obviously ineffective (and, I suspect, even careless) methods of applied personal defense.

For now I’ll leave the obvious mistakes with personal self-defense alone, though, because knowing confrontational redirection and clever evasion are not the primary subjects of this reply. Neither does a thread like this (along with the inevitable C-1 cowboy responses that are always invoked) do anything credible for the usefulness of any gun forum on which this stuff is presented.

As far as this very well trained AND highly skilled C-3 gunman is concerned, another individual has to be one world-class internet gun bozo before he goes, ‘on the air’ to so loudly proclaim that his C-1 gun handling skills and interpersonal confrontational techniques are so much better than anybody else’s preferred method of C-3 carry. The undisputable fact is that C-3 carry has saved, and continues to save, countless civilian and military lives - The only thing that isn’t certain is exactly how many lives C-3 carry has saved; however, on a worldwide scale, the number of souls who’ve been able to avoid serious mishap because of using a C-3 semiautomatic sidearm has to be quite large.

In my opinion some of you guys really ought to cut it out. Stop dumping so vociferously on C-3 carry before some gullible, ‘twit with a gun’ decides that the only way to ever become a man is to imitate one of these C-1 gun carrying clowns and ends up shooting himself or, worse, someone else.

Just for the record: I have no problem with the police or other highly trained and equally well skilled pistoleros carrying their semiautomatic weapons in C-1. Instead, it’s C-1 gun carriers with attitudes like many of those who’ve previously responded to this thread that genuinely worry me the most.

Luke your computor made this guy a member???????? it must have a serious virus, better get it looked at
 
You made this definitive statement, yet you return to pontificate your useless twaddle. I guess this proves the fact that you are a liar as well as a blatherskite and a buffoon.

"Blatherskite"!! Now there's a word I haven't heard in about 20yrs! Nice!

Golf-clap for the outstanding use of the obscure (yet 100% appropriate) "blatherskite"! :biggrin:
 

New Threads

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
49,531
Messages
610,692
Members
75,032
Latest member
BLACKROCK6
Back
Top