Your link doesn't go to the OP, it goes to another post of yours containing more exaggerations and misinterpretations of still
another article you linked to that apparently wasn't the one I asked you about. This is where your link goes:
George Zimmerman, Trayvon Martin
saw this article just now.
says he's had domestic violence charges filed against him and arrested for assaulting a cop.
Neither of those two things are stated accurately. He had an application for an injunction filed against him, to which he responded with an application for same against the applicant. Both applications were granted, no charges filed, and the only reference to domestic violence on his "record" is that original application by an ex-girlfriend.
He was not arrested for "assaulting" a cop, he was arrested and charged with "resisting arrest without violence."
Both pieces of his background are spelled out in every single link you've posted, and every time you've posted to an article, you've exaggerated what the article says about the domestic violence "charge," and multiple articles describe the resisting arrest charge accurately, yet you still amp up the rhetoric to try to make it look worse for Zimmerman than it really is. What's up with that?
it also says he had aspired to get into LE.
Is there anything anywhere that says why he didn't become a LEO? Would it matter to you if he had applied and was rejected for, oh, I don't know, having flat feet or some other malady having nothing to do with his psychological suitability for police work? You are obviously drawing nefarious conclusions on the simple desire to get into LE. What does that make all the cops that frequent this site in your mind, or those who are working towards a career in LE, whether they agree with your take or not? Tell us what's wrong, or even the least bit unusual, with wanting to be a cop and not getting there by age 28, or applying and being rejected for as-yet unknown reasons. This ought to be good.
track record looks like he was trying to be a sheepdog.
Your penchant for extrapolating a desire to get into LE into a deep, dark, black-hearted sheepdog character flaw is absolutely stunning. Since when is a sheepdog's heart a knock on someone? There are three basic kinds of people, using the sheepdog analogy. 1) Sheep, 2) sheepdogs, and 3) wolves. Which one do you see yourself as? Obviously not a sheepdog, as you derisively describe GZ as such. And you're knocking Zimmerman for wanting to be an active particpant in protecting his community and neighbors? Unreal.
when FL issues CWPs (or whatever they may call them), do they not do background checks? if you've had a domestic violence charge here, you're not getting a permit.
SGB already answered this post quite efficiently when he asked:
Why the untruth in your post? Alligations in a civil injunction are far from a crimal complaint with charges. And being arrested ? Is everyone arrested guilty? The charges it happens were dropped ...... based on the account leading up to the arrest can you say overzealous Officer? We don't know and it's only convictions that count in this country last I knew.
Yet here you are linking to that post all over again. Are you new? Don't you know that it's really bad form to draw attention to one of your posts that has already been so thoroughly debunked as wildly overstated at best, and downright dishonest at worst?
Link Removed
hell, in the guard every year i have to sign a document about not having domestic violence charges before they'l let me have a gun for the military.
Isn't there also a widely-practiced axiom in the military that makes you duty-bound to tell the truth and conduct yourself honorably? I wonder if you could re-up if TPTB in your unit could see all the anything-but-honorable character assassination attempts you've made against GZ without being accurate or truthful in your recounting of the known facts. And "National Guard" does have kind of a sheepdog ring to it, doesn't it though. Guard of the American Way. Protector of the nation and The People. What, are you some kind of wannabe sheepdog?
Link Removed
I have no idea how old you are. If you're in the Guard, there's a better than fair chance that you're pretty wet behind the ears and wouldn't remember another sheepdog-type who got his character assassinated by the same lame-stream media that's working on Zimmerman right now. If you know the name of Richard Jewell, you probably know what I'm talking about. If you don't, look it up and get some enlightenment about what can happen when the media (and its sheep-like lemmings) get their hooks into a good man who's just trying to do the right thing. Or stay unenlightened, up to you.
#2)NW'ers dont help "solve" anything, they report.
Good grief. If they report information that leads to an arrest and conviction, then they have helped solve the crime! Are you PWI or what?
i guess GZ's dad was wrong about his son wanting to be a cop as well?
Again, what exactly is wrong with wanting to be a cop, "as well" or otherwise?
#3)the #3 thing in the other article was pointing out the thoughts of the director on TMs injuries. i asked family/neighborhood cover up b/c if the injuries happened to GZ, there should have been injuries on TM. if the tape evidence shows the injuries to GZ and this guy is saying TM had no injuries, someone is wrong. could it be the folks down there saying the injuries to TM didnt happen when they actually did.
And.....
There's a HUGE difference between a medical examine (one who conducts a medico-legal investigation into deaths, including autopsies) and a funeral director (one who sells funeral services, includng embalming, which helps preserve a dead body). Mr. Kurz is a funeral director. FDs in Florida are licensed professionals.
One of the things FDs do when they prep a body is see what injuries have to be covered with make-up for the viewing. FDs can work miracles with makeup; I've seen headshot suicides have open-casket funerals. If a metro-area FD says he didn't see signs of a fight on a body's hands, I'd expect hi to know what he's talking about.
As to the ME vs. funeral director, oops, my bad. Beyond that though, I honestly can't believe that this funeral director's conjecture about the absence of bruises on Trayvon's hands can completely discredit the eye-witness account in y'all's minds. I mean, there's nothing in the record that suggests that the witness "John" is connected to Zimmerman. What's his motivation to lie? The motivation on the FD's part is evident by the rhetoric that he spews! By accepting his conjecture and attached rhetoric, you're signing onto Sharpton's, Farrakhan's and Obama's spewage lock, stock and barrel! How is that even possible on a gun forum populated almost entirely by gun owners and gun carriers? To quote Winston Churchill,
"It is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma."
Welcome to Wonder Land. We are chasing each other down and through a veritable labyrinth of rabbit holes. It's the first time in history that I'm proud to be acting like a female - Alice kept asking questions and demanding answers as she tried to figure out what was reality and what was Wonder Land illusions. Y'all are clinging to your illusions as consistently as the Cheshire Cat kept smiling. It's baffling. Truly baffling.
Blues