No one is questioning the legality of his carrying his AK pistol that day at Radnor Park.
Then why do people keep arguing about it?
Some are concerned that his behavior prior to that day, his stated motives, his planning, his acknowledged frustration, his actions culminating with the Radnor event might indicate problems to come. He has stated his purpose is to create circumstances which would facilitate a confrontation with law enforcement. He's also stated he fears the police will shoot him.
(you brought this up, so I will comment on it)
Is there something wrong with expecting the police to actually know the laws they are hired to enforce? Is it not a wise thing to think the police may harass someone for doing something legal when there are many examples of such, and to be prepared for it... say by having voice recorders to prove they are doing something illegal?
We are not allowed to protect ourselves from such behavior from our employees? To insist that they actually do their jobs correctly? (I am not bashing cops, don't even try to go there) I have, actually, read some of his other posts on other forums. His reasoning for painting the tip orange was a very logical one to me.... he didnt want the cops to shoot him. Is he crazy or stupid for not wanting to be shot?
You might want to google "open carry incident" for many examples of proof that Police Have harassed and arrested people for NOT breaking ANY laws. So, with that in mind, he is a bad man and we should rebuke him and all he has done to try to show others that there is something wrong with the way Innocents are being treated?
I myself have stated here that I don't particularly approve of how he went about this, but I at least have the common courtesy to allow him to practice his Constitutional rights the way he see's fit. Who are you or I to rebuke, attack, or yell at someone
WHO DID NOT BREAK ANY LAWS OR INFRINGE ON ANYONE ELSE'S RIGHTS?
*Rant Off*
Yes, for your purpose, your agenda, none of that has relevance. But it is important to tie in the other facts surrounding Mr. Embody so no one is mislead into believing Mr. Embody is a pure 2nd Amendment issue. He is not and has stated such in his posts.
Thank you, you are quite correct here, He is also sticking up for our 1st Amendment rights too, and at times, the 4th and 5th Amendments. (like during possibly illegal detainments and such)
Ignoring the totality of Mr. Embody's circumstances is like saying your posts in this thread paint a complete picture of your character.
I was ignoring his other actions and posts because they are exactly that, other actions and other posts. We are discussing this one incident only. If you desire to have a discussion on what he has done other times, you can start another thread, no-one is stopping you or anyone else from doing so. There may even be a possibility that I wont comment on one or even all of those threads! Wouldn't that be nice? :sarcastic:
I do honestly thank you for your post.