Correct. First contact was made by the store keep for whatever reason. Until then- who knows why this tiny man would want to "accost" this teenager- when the juxtaposition of their statures remind me of the story, David and Goliath. And again you're correct- in the very same theory- that the- "said person" has yet to claim that he was a victim of theft/strong arm robbery- he also has yet to deny that he is a victim of such- as well.
No victim, no crime,
period.
The owner doesn't need to be the source of the robbery report- bc here's a theory. First off- a customer had already called it in & described whatever they saw Fine- as long as the story doesn't come from the owner. One of my girlfriends, her father is an immigrant from china, and owns a little take out joint, called China Chop Suey. Its in north city. He's been robbed before. By customers he knows. but he WONT CALL IT IN. because people in that area- teach you that "SNITCHES GET STITCHES"- this is not some gangster- lifestyle that you see in the movies. This is a REAL LIFE MOTTO people live by. Why do you think QT was the first to be looted and torched? It may be just a coincidence that - the first rumor- was that Brown stole cigars from QT. The employees at QT described their experience at QT- when the place got looted- somewhere along the lines as such: we locked ourselves in (some room)- until someone said they knew a way to get out without being spotted. Then we ran out while covering up our uniform shirt. (why cover the uniform shirt?)
?Snitches Get Stitches? message spray painted on burned-out QuikTrip | FOX2now.com
As to the bold part, someone else could report it, true enough, but if the victim doesn't accept his victimhood and sign a statement to same, no victim, no crime,
period.
There's another analysis out there (or just over here, being typed out) The owner does not want to be involved! they want to be able to reopen their store and not fear reprecussions of angry customers/community/looters. The owner knows that they have NOTHING to benefit from this in opening their mouth. Now, on a separate note- IMO If their version of what they believe to be true- favored Brown, i think it would be easier for them to defend Brown- bc IMO that will save the future of their business if and when it should reopen. At the end of the day- forget not that- these people have lost their store- and possibly entire livelihood- due to events entirely out of their control- but yet completely demolished their store.
I've owned a retail business before. 10 years and we did very well. I carried a gun every day, and so did my wife. If a robbery had ever been attempted on us, it would've been a very bad day for the robber(s). If I felt incompetent to handle that responsibility, but too afraid to even report it to cops if I had been robbed, then I can guaran-damn-tee you that I would've either found another less dangerous business, or less dangerous place to conduct my business.
Bottom line, no victim, no crime,
period.
That being said, and as I have said before, I hold no quarter for looters, thugs or arsonists. I feel bad for
anybody who has suffered
any undeserved consequences in all this, but as per usual, everyone trying to "reply to" me ignores the subject and deflects into only semi-related side-issues. The store video was used by the cops
illegitimately to show a reason why Wilson would have contacted Brown and Johnson. It was a
lie. Either this is about the possible justification that existed for Wilson to use deadly force on an unarmed citizen who, as far as he knew at the time, had done nothing but jaywalk, or that question doesn't matter a wit and it's just about demonizing, blaming and
using black folk in Ferguson, MO as an excuse to spew screed after racist screed based on a small minority of criminals who have infiltrated the otherwise peaceful, but yeah, pissed off, crowds.
One 12 oz. water bottle being thrown last night that didn't even hit any cop, caused at least one cop to aggressively charge a bunch of journalists and protesters
with his AR-15 shouldered within a couple of feet of their faces while saying, "I'm going to F'n
kill you!" Michael Brown isn't responsible for any of what you're busy trying to demonize him for. He's dead because another cop who also said he was going to shoot the unarmed citizen,
did.
Blues