Let me clarify. Psychological shock, also called Acute Stress Disorder not Medical Shock. This is why after an adrenaline dump you don't talk to the cops without a lawyer.
Still curious if you have medical expertise that you're basing your diagnosis on.
Reason for not releasing this information before? Police Union.
Really? I thought it was HIPAA? And you say the reason the info hasn't been released "
before?" It hasn't been released
yet! It's a rumor based on anonymous DA and cop sources.
Also, evidence should be presented in court not the media.
Sure, unless it's evidence of Michael Brown doing something wrong just moments before he was killed by the cop who knew nothing of the so-called strong arm robbery when he contacted the pair. He was basically contacted for jaywalking, and from that contact flowed the killing of the unarmed citizen.
An SUV makes the cops story that Big Mike was trying to get his gun more believable. It would be hard for a 6' 4" 300 pound man to duck into a sedan and try to do that. Or it could be that the cop swung open the door so forcefully that it belly bounced off of Big Mike and smacking himself in the face causing him to fumble his pistol and have an accidental discharge.
Wow. You mean Wilson would be justified in having his firearm drawn as he approached two citizens for jaywalking? No shooting that ensues from that kind of carelessness can be called an "accident." That is the definition of
negligence and
misconduct. And even if you're going to stick with this hypothesis, getting smacked in the face because of his own actions could've also "blew out" his orbital socket.
As far as the part above that is not in bold, the SUV also supplies credibility to Dorian Johnson's story for the exact same reason. Both he and Piaget Crenshaw say that the cop was pulling Brown into the window, and Johnson says he was threatening to shoot him almost from the beginning after he tried to open the door too close to them and it "ricocheted" off of both of them.
It is really too bad that the department did not have dash cameras. Hopefully they or someone recorded the police radio directly before and after the shooting.
Oh, so you haven't heard the radio traffic? Some pretty troubling information
contained in it. Bottom line, Wilson never reported the shooting. Dispatch was only alerted that they needed help with crowd control at the scene. More than 10 minutes after traffic began on the incident, the dispatcher can be heard saying,
"They just told me they needed assistance on crowd control on Canfield and Coppercreek." Around a minute later, the St Louis dispatcher said:
"She just said that they have a large group gathering there, she didn't know anything further."
Seconds later, the dispatcher said:
"We just got another call saying there was an officer involved shooting at Canfield and Coppercreek. I don't know who called it in but it was called into my desk."
A dispatcher then added:
"Be advised, this information came from the news."
Nice huh? Raise any questions in your mind about the credibility of the White Knight, Officer Darren Wilson?
Of course none of this would have happened if the store owner had been armed and prevented Big Mike from stealing that $50 box of cigars.
Even this "robbery" is called into question by the available facts, #1 being that the owner of the store who he supposedly "strong-armed"
isn't even the source of the "robbery" report. It was a customer in the store who called it in, and the warrant for the video didn't issue until a full week later, on Friday, the same day the Chief released it in a cynical ploy to give Wilson cover for the jaywalking stop that the Chief himself contradicted just four hours later! Those are actual facts, but...
There is also
analysis out there of the video that explains why the store owner(s) didn't call in the "robbery;" because, according to this analysis, it wasn't a robbery, it was an argument, and nothing the owner(s) of the store have said before or since contradicts any of it.
While it is difficult to be 100% certain, the video appears to show Brown purchasing some cigars, but lacking the money for the amount he wished to buy. Brown seems to purchase some cigarillos, pay for them, attempt to buy more, then replace the ones he could not afford.
The confrontation between Brown and the clerk may have been because Brown impatiently reached across the counter. Perhaps it was wrong for Brown to shove the employee (it is impossible to know what words were exchanged) but this footage seems to exonerate him. It is important to note that Brown only shoved the clerk after he put his hands on him.
In any case, neither the employee nor the store owner called law enforcement–something that would surely happen if Brown committed a "strong-arm robbery."
I strongly dislike that source (Crooks & Liars) and their source (Americans Against the Tea Party), but I've watched the video many times and can't see anything that invalidates their analysis. Is their analysis recounting "facts?" Absolutely not, but neither is anybody else talking "facts" when they make excuses about HIPAA or the cop union preventing Wilson from saying what happened to him, or at least what specific injuries he supposedly sustained. People are ignoring the fact that the owners never reported a robbery. People are discounting actual eye-witness accounts and accepting as supporting Wilson's (as yet untold) story from anonymous callers into radio shows and anonymous sources from the prosecutor's office and cop-shop.
And at the bottom line, an unarmed young man with no criminal record is dead at the hands of a cop who failed to even call in the shooting in a jurisdiction where 3 warrants are issued
per household, per year on average, and 1.5 cases are actually charged
per household, per year on average. If there's not something bad wrong with that scenario, then it's anything goes in this country as long as the killers are sworn to protect and defend the Constitution
that the stats prove in my mind that they decidedly do
not.
Blues
