LkWd_Don
Banned
Well, I wouldn't WANT Citizens thinking they're qualified to make the complex legal decisions that trained LEOs make. ~~ clipped ~~
No. I don't think civilians or armed citizens NEED to be partnering with First Responders, whose JOB is to walk into these hot situations with the LAW on their sides, so the citizen doesn't get mixed up in it.
I mean, if the average citizen wants to "partner" with First Responders, then I suggest that citizen become a certified EMT or a volunteer Fireman or go to the Police Academy and take a Criminal Justice course — I don't think some well-meaning citizen with a Concealed Carry permit (who barely managed to keep all his rounds inside a 2-foot target at 21 feet, okay?), is qualified to attend or is needed in the "crime fighting" community.
~~ clipped ~~ Am I right or am I right?
In which case, WE become the last line of defense of American Liberty.
THAT'S WHY the citizenry should ALWAYS be better armed than the government.
And we ARE better armed than the government, actually. I mean, the American Military is comprised of a little over 2 million active personnel, believe it or not. That's all. ~~ clipped ~~.
As your interpretation of partnering is closer to equating each partner to being the same.. I would agree. With my interpretation being different, I would disagree. I am not saying or even tying to insinuate/suggest that untrained civilians should ever consider themselves to be equal to our First responders and capable of doing those jobs, thereby giving them any right or authority to go out looking to do their first responders jobs.. Though I do see that it is more than possible with simple coordination with our first responders to become less of a victim and to make things easier for those first responders to do their jobs and that is my interpretation of partnering with the first responders.