Musing on Boston 'Lockdown' and Door to Door searches

We are discussing an event in Massachusetts, right? Few law abiding citizens have handguns in that state and the long guns are suppose to be locked up, aren't they? Me thinks the BG has an advantage there.

Yes, sadly and they probably won't even now realize how useful having a gun can be.
 
The people supported this out of an abundance of caution. No one's house was searched against their will. Not every house was searched. In some cases they just talked with a homeowner, ensured they were secure and advised locking down. When a perp is thought to be hiding on your property the police can require you leave the area. Refusal in a dire situation is obstruction. This isn't to violate your rights it's to protect the responders that must weed-out the perp. As can be seen from the celebratory response of the people after the situation ended, the majority were pleased, thankful and proud of the speed and manner in which the situation was handled and the focus on safety to the communities. In addition, if people started moving about they would make it easier for the suspect to blend. But when the streets are empty it's very hard for the suspect to move about.
 
The highly educated police administrator that made the decision to"search every house from _____street to ____avenue." But sir we don't have enough men for that. Call in all the off duty, all leaves and comp days are cancelled.
I heard the press conference and they are asking the residents. (with a team of cops in SWAT gear)
What a waste of time and manpower. Good God.

And after all the highly skilled police doing door to door search it still was the everyday citizen who found the the perp. "Hey, you guys missed something over here!":no:
 
When a perp is thought to be hiding on your property the police can require you leave the area. Refusal in a dire situation is obstruction. This isn't to violate your rights it's to protect the responders that must weed-out the perp.

Methinks this is only true when they have direct knowledge or at least a strong damn hunch that a felon is in that specific location. Otherwise any cop could show up at your door and say "I think there's a criminal in there" and search your stuff... Don't get me wrong I think there are instances where a search is prudent, if you haven't been home all day and/or something seems suspicious sure, let them look, but it should always be your choice, its your home, your right.
 
And after all the highly skilled police doing door to door search it still was the everyday citizen who found the the perp. "Hey, you guys missed something over here!":no:

Indeed, because he was hiding outside their 'perimeter' of searches... Seems whoever made this perimeter underestimated a bit.
 
REALLY?, you can't compare (fairly) ANY state to a Constitutional Carry state and you know it!......What MA has on VT is no gun signs have no force of law, and MA has a castle doctrine.

Signs do not carry the force of law in Vermont either, sorry! There is NO assault weapons restrictions and if you get "caught" with a silenced weapon, its a $50 fine.
No castle doc but duty to retreat is ONLY if it can be done safely. If not... Let'em rip!
 
Indeed, because he was hiding outside their 'perimeter' of searches... Seems whoever made this perimeter underestimated a bit.

I saw where somebody tweeted how they lifted the lockdown, which in turn allowed the boat owner to leave his house, which allowed him to find the perp. Bingo.
 
This whole event was definitely a test of martial law. I think the police on the ground had good intentions, but the feds and those at the top were definitely testing how compliant people in 2013 will be with government takeover of the streets.
 
I think many people are making more out of this than it is. Why be an ass? This wasn't the average criminal situation. This was a very serious matter and the potential for harm was exceedingly high. the fact that people locked down when faced with this situation can hardly be compared with what would happen in a government takeover. this wasn't a test for some upcoming operation.
 
I think many people are making more out of this than it is. Why be an ass? This wasn't the average criminal situation. This was a very serious matter and the potential for harm was exceedingly high. the fact that people locked down when faced with this situation can hardly be compared with what would happen in a government takeover. this wasn't a test for some upcoming operation.

I'm not really buying into the conspiracy theory either or 'test of martial law' or whatever people want to call it, but neither do I feel like it's 'being an ass' to kindly tell the police to move along and leave your house alone. People are too quick to give up their rights in the times when they matter most like an emergency situation. Still plenty of folks from New Orleans missing their guns after the government decided there was a 'serious matter with a high potential for harm' which was more important than the rights of the citizens.
 
I'm not really buying into the conspiracy theory either or 'test of martial law' or whatever people want to call it, but neither do I feel like it's 'being an ass' to kindly tell the police to move along and leave your house alone. People are too quick to give up their rights in the times when they matter most like an emergency situation. Still plenty of folks from New Orleans missing their guns after the government decided there was a 'serious matter with a high potential for harm' which was more important than the rights of the citizens.
Yep, NO forgot the lessons learned from Hurricane Andrew in 1992. There was a dusk to dawn curfew put in place days after the storm here. Took a judge to tell the gov't that no, they couldn't do that. Same as a judge had to tell DACS inspectors that a blanket search warrant is not valid when looking for diseased plants. A warrant has to be specific. Can't just bust into a place or there will be consequences.
 
. When a perp is thought to be hiding on your property the police can require you leave the area. Refusal in a dire situation is obstruction. This isn't to violate your rights it's to protect the responders that must weed-out the perp. .
I agree that if a perp is next door holding hostages then you may be required to evacuate in case of a shoot out and bullets travelling through windows and walls.. Hell I have taken up sniper positions in peoples houses or roofs in those situations. It was in the 80s though and I sought permission.
Now a whole city is shut down? We would set up a perimeter of a couple of blocks perhaps but a whole city? A whole neighborhood is systematically searched on bad intel and a hell of a lot of man power. There was a time when this kind of action would land you in very hot water. And again I ask about the hundreds of shots that were fired into the boat. Police weather federal or local can not carry out an execution except to save a life in eminent danger. Just sayin.
 
When he failed to respond they opened fire at the boat’s hull. Robert said:

Finally got some mention of the shooting of what sounded to me like over a hundred rounds of full and semi auto fire, FROM A BRITISH PAPER!

David Henneberry had gone into his garden for a cigarette after police lifted restrictions on people leaving their homes, believing the bomber had left the area. He noticed that the cover over his boat had blood on it and a strap had been cut. He went back into the house to get a stepladder and looked inside.

His stepson Robert said: “He stuck his head under the tarp and noticed a pool of blood and something crumpled up in a ball. Instead of being a hero of the moment and yelling at what we now know was the suspect, he did the right thing and called 911.”

Police immediately evacuated the family and surrounded the house, using a megaphone to tell Dzhokhar to come out with his hands up.

When he failed to respond they opened fire at the boat’s hull. Robert said: “They wound up *shooting a couple of rounds through the boat. He wasn’t going to like that.”

Dzhokhar was wounded by the volley of gunfire and police were able to move in and arrest him. They later released infrared pictures taken from a helicopter showing Dzhokhar hiding in the boat.

Investigators will interrogate the bomber, still seriously ill last night, without reading him his rights – using special “public safety” powers.
Boston bombers: FBI hunting 12-strong terrorist ?sleeper cell? linked to brothers Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev - Mirror Online
 
I love statements based on nothing!




YES THERE IS!, It's always amazing to me how many people think that MA is the same as NY, NJ or CA....IT'S NOT! There is no shortage of gun owners in MA. The permit system may be flawed, but gun owners in MA have it easier than many in PRO gun states!

It's the law in MA. That statement seems to be true. Had this happened down south, those two would have died within the hour.

Prove that you have it better. Have a .40 on my hip, an AR-15 with a 30 rd mag ready to rock within 10 feet unlocked and pocket rocket in my desk drawer, inches from my other gun. All unlocked, all chambered and no law to prevent me from doing so. I can walk around my property adjacent to the highway running past it armed to the teeth and no cops will bother me. I can open carry anywhere I choose, conceal carry without fear of reprisal and target shoot anytime I please. Cops ask me what kind of gun it is, how much, do you have or have you shot this one, etc. if there is dialogue about it.
 
Finally got some mention of the shooting of what sounded to me like over a hundred rounds of full and semi auto fire, FROM A BRITISH PAPER!

David Henneberry had gone into his garden for a cigarette after police lifted restrictions on people leaving their homes, believing the bomber had left the area. He noticed that the cover over his boat had blood on it and a strap had been cut. He went back into the house to get a stepladder and looked inside.

His stepson Robert said: “He stuck his head under the tarp and noticed a pool of blood and something crumpled up in a ball. Instead of being a hero of the moment and yelling at what we now know was the suspect, he did the right thing and called 911.”

Police immediately evacuated the family and surrounded the house, using a megaphone to tell Dzhokhar to come out with his hands up.

When he failed to respond they opened fire at the boat’s hull. Robert said: “They wound up *shooting a couple of rounds through the boat. He wasn’t going to like that.”

Dzhokhar was wounded by the volley of gunfire and police were able to move in and arrest him. They later released infrared pictures taken from a helicopter showing Dzhokhar hiding in the boat.

Investigators will interrogate the bomber, still seriously ill last night, without reading him his rights – using special “public safety” powers.
Boston bombers: FBI hunting 12-strong terrorist ?sleeper cell? linked to brothers Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev - Mirror Online

"Public safety powers" lmao,i bet he used his "no speaka engrish" powers. Execute. Don't make us pay for his coddling.
 
"Public safety powers" lmao,i bet he used his "no speaka engrish" powers. Execute. Don't make us pay for his coddling.

Don't worry, obamacare limits the price the hospital will charge us for his care... Unless there's an exemption for felons in there... To be honest I think the cops did try to murder him and were as surpised as anyone he survived having read varying reports stating anywhere from "a few" to "around thirty" to "what sounded like a hundred" shots into the boat where he was already lying unresponsive and near death.
 
The people supported this out of an abundance of caution. No one's house was searched against their will. Not every house was searched. In some cases they just talked with a homeowner, ensured they were secure and advised locking down. When a perp is thought to be hiding on your property the police can require you leave the area. Refusal in a dire situation is obstruction. This isn't to violate your rights it's to protect the responders that must weed-out the perp. As can be seen from the celebratory response of the people after the situation ended, the majority were pleased, thankful and proud of the speed and manner in which the situation was handled and the focus on safety to the communities. In addition, if people started moving about they would make it easier for the suspect to blend. But when the streets are empty it's very hard for the suspect to move about.

Lots of citizen-video of the house-to-house searches are now emerging BC, and they don't comport with your assertion that no one's house was searched against their will. Nor do they comport with the assertion that not every house was searched.

Take a look at this one where somewhere around 8 - 10 people are rousted out of their home (or it may have been apartments, not sure about that) and forced to put their hands up as they exit. Then they're frisked and sent down the sidewalk to a waiting area while the building is overrun with highly militarized SWAT and FBI agents.

house search in watertown, ma - YouTube

Does the guy shooting this video sound "pleased, thankful and proud" that the cops in full battle gear have invaded his quiet neighborhood?

SWAT Video - YouTube

Am I overly suspicious of a commander who can't allow an open mic that is picking up his underlings' conversations between themselves as they sweep a neighborhood because, I think, he might fear a civilian scanner picking up evidence of some extra-constitutional going on within that perimeter?

WATCH YOUR MIC - YouTube

Can I get a little paranoid when the cops start demanding the names of women they have already ordered outside of their home so it could be searched unsupervised, when the only suspect of wrong-doing that they're ostensibly looking for at that time was one 19-year-old male? A male with a foreign accent at that?

LIVE INSIDE Martial Law in Watertown MA | Part 12 - YouTube

These thugs are not our friends. Right now the most useless organization in America is Oath Keepers, as apparently there's not a single oath keeping public "servant" serving anywhere in the Boston area that could make his/her voice heard through a ubiquitous device known as a modern cell phone with video/audio recording capability.

And the most heartbreaking irony of the tyranny that many of us recognize as such, is that it's going out over the airwaves in real-time in the Boston area on April 19th. Has anyone thought about that date or that general location with all this going on? Does the bridge at Lexington Green ring a bell? Concord? That's right, the "shot heard around the world" was fired by Pastor Jonas Clark on April 19, 1775. The fight for republican freedom started in the Boston area, and we watched on live, real-time TV as it continued its death throes in the same general place and on its anniversary 238 years later.

I almost posted this piece three days ago when I got a link to it in email, but figured it would be ignored because, well, history is just so yesterday around here (pun intended). I dare anybody to read that bit of history and come back saying that what all the video of the government siege on Boston represents being "protected" by the police state that is our now-permanent and unopposed reality. It's really a rather sickening thing to see. Those house-to-house searches were just a good excuse to look around for guns, ammo, high capacity magazines, the wrong kind of reading material, food preps, etc.

This is a post from my other home on the interwebs by a poster named "Cameraman."

Cameraman said:
This is disgusting and Scary, these people are All Fools, this should be a wake up call to everybody! I watched the People being pulled out of their homes Hands up like Criminals, and the sheep complied!

This Country is going to hell in a hand Basket, they spend thousand of Dollars and Locked down a Major City, losing more in revenue and Business, to catch two Criminals? What sense has this Country got Left? We live in Fear of this almighty Police State, and complain yet these people Complied like the Sheep they are! PATRIOTS they are Not! Clapped for their captors, and Damn they went without Starbucks Too!

It speaks my thoughts exactly. The republic is dead. I will remember her fondly.

Blues
 
So we just got done having our "gun control" debate and waste of time in congress and the theatrical gimics of the garbage in the whitehouse, as they all "fed" off the carcasses of 20 dead children at Sandy Hook and told all of us that they want total gun control that leads to confiscation of our firearms. Now, in Boston, you are suppose to lock your door and stay inside and if we do end up with no firearms, we are suppose to follow their commands to stay in our home unarmed. May I humbly ask how quickly the police will arrive at my house if the BG should break in now that I am unarmed and unable to adequately protect myself and my family. The sheer idiocy of this gun control crap and what has been happening in Boston is incredible.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
49,523
Messages
610,662
Members
74,992
Latest member
RedDotArmsTraining
Back
Top