Michael Brown
- Thread starter Courtney.cj.chen
- Start date
BluesStringer
Les Brers
Assuming I could identify that they have the obvious and unambiguous intent, means, proximity and opportunity to accomplish the task, I'd shoot 'em.
Here in Alabama the law would support me in that decision, but whether the law supported that decision or not, I'd still shoot 'em.
What would you do?
BC1
,
Absolutely. They're going. And it would be legal.
.
NYS Penal Law S35.20 Justification; use of physical force in defense of premises and in defense of a person in the course of burglary.
.
1. Any person may use physical force upon another person when he or she reasonably believes such to be necessary to prevent or terminate what he or she reasonably believes to be the commission or attempted commission by such other person of a crime involving damage to premises. Such person may use any degree of physical force, other than deadly physical force, which he or she reasonably believes to be necessary for such purpose, and may use deadly physical force if he or she reasonably believes such to be necessary to prevent or terminate the commission or attempted commission of arson.
AndeyHall
Active member
Uh oh Blues, another cop shoots an innocent man in Florida. Although the man had just ambushed, shot and killed one deputy and shot and wounded another, that has no relevance to the third officer shooting and killing the man. Just a cold blooded and senseless killing, further displaying the tyrannical behavior of today's law enforcement.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...eputy-ambushed-killed-officials-say/19409763/
(I'm wanting to try out this thug-fluffer stance of yours and see how it feels. So far I have to say it just feels like everything that's wrong with society today)
Firefighterchen
OC for Tactical Advantage
Badge fluffing...this post just oozes with desperation...
Sent from my D6616 using USA Carry mobile app
AndeyHall
Active member
Actually quite the opposite. You keep accusing me and others of that, so I wanted to try out the thug fluffing side of things.
AndeyHall
Active member
This is my view about all the riots. If they're just protesting, that's one thing. As soon as actual riots start...mow them all down.
S&W645
NRA Life Member
And BC1, a better question would be: 9mm, .40S&W, .45ACP, 5.56mm, .30 Carbine, .30-06, 7.62X54R, 12ga? Do you feel lucky punk, well do ya?
If rioters are going to attack your place with fire bombs, is it fair to shoot them with tracer rounds or API? Fight fire with fire. :biggrin:
If rioters are going to attack your place with fire bombs, is it fair to shoot them with tracer rounds or API? Fight fire with fire. :biggrin:
Firefighterchen
OC for Tactical Advantage
All of them? The very small percentage of protesters that became violent so far is all you need to justify killing all the other protesters and news crews out here?
Heil the police state!
Sent from my D6616 using USA Carry mobile app
BluesStringer
Les Brers
Considering the context of the post you replied to, perhaps you can enlighten us as to whom you imagine the "thugs" that I'm "fluffing" are? Would it be the two white workers reacting spontaneously to what they saw just seconds before? Would it be the media "thugs" because that report came from CNN? In the video I was highlighting, clearly the freaking thug that the people in it were referring to was Darren Wilson for shooting a man twice in the head who had his hands up.
Do you never tire of being a badgefluffing putz? Guess not. You've decided to make a career out of it. Go fluff yourself, putz.
Blues
BluesStringer
Les Brers
I haven't heard that, but it wouldn't surprise me if it was true. Brown's friend/robbery accomplice/formerly accused of lying to cops (but never charged, prosecuted or convicted of)/whatever, Dorian Johnson said the same day that "a" shot went off in the vehicle, and the leaked evidence ostensibly presented in the grand jury says that he was shot once (in the hand) from inside the vehicle.
It is that leaked evidence that many people hang their hats on to infer that Brown was going for Wilson's gun, and therefore, Wilson was justified in firing at least nine more rounds, the last volley of which put two rounds to his head as many as 90 seconds later at the same time that at least five witnesses say his hands were up while trying to surrender.
Brown's DNA being in, on or near the cop's SUV (or the cop himself) is a fairly insignificant factoid as to whether or not the kill shots were justifiable. I'm having a hard time understanding why people making a big deal about that possibility are doing so. Many have said that it proves that Johnson is a liar, while the fact is, it confirms at least part of his story.
Not saying you're making a big deal about it BC, just a general kind of query.
Blues
whodat2710
New member
Black Caucus Leader Gives A Warning to Ferguson Grand Jury | The Federalist Papers
This is going to be a repeat of the aftermath of the Rodney King verdict, with one exception - the National Guard is there to implement Martial Law, just like Obama wants.
-
Valerie Jarrett's plan is starting to come to fruition. Jobs and the economy are circling the bowl, so gubment assistance is at an all-time high; The borders are still porous, but amnesty has been granted; the military is being decimated and further deployed (upping the ante in Afghanistan); veterans will be losing benefits if the SecDef and Joint Chiefs have their way, probably hoping to force us into obamacare; we are at "war" with ISIS, which conveniently makes us allies with everyone in the Middle East (except Israel); Christianity is threatened, while we allow islam to be taught in schools; the American flag is now a symbol of radical right wing "terrorists", we donate billions in taxpayer money to countries that hate us (all borrowed from China); all that is left is to declare Martial Law and start the weapons confiscation (i.e. civil war) and their agenda will be near completion. That is the only reason that there is national attention on this case, so that if they can create some rioting, they might then get it to spread nationwide via race-baiting hatred spewing filth like Sharpton, Jackson, and the CBC.
This is closely akin to that "protester" who started "justice for MB" or whatever that told Sean Hannity he didn't want justice for the cop, just for MB.
-
Valerie Jarrett's plan is starting to come to fruition. Jobs and the economy are circling the bowl, so gubment assistance is at an all-time high; The borders are still porous, but amnesty has been granted; the military is being decimated and further deployed (upping the ante in Afghanistan); veterans will be losing benefits if the SecDef and Joint Chiefs have their way, probably hoping to force us into obamacare; we are at "war" with ISIS, which conveniently makes us allies with everyone in the Middle East (except Israel); Christianity is threatened, while we allow islam to be taught in schools; the American flag is now a symbol of radical right wing "terrorists", we donate billions in taxpayer money to countries that hate us (all borrowed from China); all that is left is to declare Martial Law and start the weapons confiscation (i.e. civil war) and their agenda will be near completion. That is the only reason that there is national attention on this case, so that if they can create some rioting, they might then get it to spread nationwide via race-baiting hatred spewing filth like Sharpton, Jackson, and the CBC.
AndeyHall
Active member
Wasn't replying to that post, just you.
BluesStringer
Les Brers
And the part in bold is utterly ridiculous. Analyzing what Butterfield knows of the available evidence and concluding that there's ample probable cause to bring a charge is nothing like saying he only wants justice for Brown. Further, using the word "pushback" and going on to describe it as meaning 1st-Amendment-compliant protests that he hopes will remain peaceful and non-violent is nothing like issuing a "warning" to the GJ whose identities are all literally a state secret.
Only this kind of hysterical nonsense could lead this conservative, who's probably further right-wing than Genghis freakin' Khan, to stick up for the leader of the Congressional Black Caucus.
With the exception of the statement that, "This is going to be a repeat of the aftermath of the Rodney King verdict, with one exception..." I think you've finally stumbled onto some rational and plausible conjecture about what may be behind the federal response to all this. Otherwise, this hasn't been, nor will it be, anything like how or why the LA riots started after the cops were acquitted in a trial in LA, 1992. The only thing in common that the two events have is that there were riots. That's it.
AndeyHall
Active member
Again, it just baffles me that anyone is willing to believe that a devoted officer with a reputation such as Darren Wilson would commit a cold blooded execution in the middle of the street on an "innocent young boy". I live amongst some mighty racist people and I just can't even see that driving someone to murder someone like that. Not someone with as much to lose as Wilson had...
BluesStringer
Les Brers
So when you hit the link that says, "Reply With Quote," you weren't replying to that post? You're not only a badgefluffer, you're a freakin' idiot, and now you've admitted that your only reason for posting was to troll me. You have the right to remain silent, pork-breath, I suggest you take advantage of it.
