I have to wonder ..if Martin was 21 instead of 17 and had a permit to carry, would he have had the right to “Stand His Ground?”
When Zimmerman got out of his car after being told by the police not to approach the “suspect walker” and approached and confronted the kid anyway, would the kid then have had a right to tell him he was carrying concealed and demand that Zimmerman ‘BACK OFF.’
Did the kid, since he was doing nothing wrong, have the right to stand his ground and protect himself with his fists when confronted by Zimmerman? ….Zimmerman who had no legal right to demand why the kid was walking on the sidewalks in Zimmerman’s “territory?”
If Zimmerman had stayed in his vehicle and had just followed the kid while waiting for the LEO, and not gotten into the kid’s face, there would be no discussion here. Zimmerman was not a trained “Community Watch” person, nor a LEO, and had no right to place himself in a self-defense situation and would have avoided problems by simply staying in his car.
My read is Martin had the right to “stand his ground!” And not to be shot by a stranger using deadly force in a confrontational fist-fight he started! I know if I was Martin and had Zimmerman confronted me in this situation, I would have ask him to back-off …of course, I am an armed citizen and I am satisfied he would have, once I informed him of his peril if he persisted, left me alone immediately.
I have to deduct Zimmerman was not stupid. He was ready, willing and desiring to shoot himself a ‘bad-guy.’
Neither Zimmermann nor Treyvon did anything illegal - the question is who and what started the fight.