Firefighterchen
OC for Tactical Advantage
That's fine with me. I don't deserve drunks or potheads on the range, or on the road.
You, like Jim, are the reason why this countries freedom failed.
Sent from my D6616 using USA Carry mobile app
That's fine with me. I don't deserve drunks or potheads on the range, or on the road.
You, like Jim, are the reason why this countries freedom failed.
I don't associate intoxicants with "freedom". It's actually enslavement.
all of you have utterly failed to show any evidence of your position of "marijuana makes people shoot innocents" ..... Or that it actually is a problem other than in your very bigoted minds....... But,,, you have shown everyone on here that you dont give a rats azz about other peoples rights......
Until your rights are or have actually been infringed upon by someone smoking pot, nothing you say is valid, period.....
I don't associate intoxicants with "freedom". It's actually enslavement.
Spoken like someone who STILL has no effing clue....... an UnConstitutional "law" is NOT A LAW AT ALL........ Get your head out of your backside and wake up.... Until you do that, YOU ARE PART OF THE FRIGGING PROBLEM that gives legitimacy to those UNLAWFUL "laws".....
Let's try a little experiment... Take the constitution in one hand, and some marijuana in the other and stop by your local police station. Explain to them that the law is unconstitutional and that you have every right to smoke your marijuana in their lobby.
Actually it was just me. That's what I think of people like you, you are not an ally to freedom or liberty...or maybe you just want to restrict the 1st amendment too. Not surprising, with the username N R A, it make sense.
You should keep telling everyone why marijuana is a schedule 1 drug, its a good laugh with how uneducated you are on drug schedules.
Sent from my D6616 using USA Carry mobile app
All of you have utterly FAILED to show ANY EVIDENCE of your position of "marijuana makes people shoot innocents" ..... or that it ACTUALLY is a problem other than in your very bigoted minds....... BUT,,, You HAVE shown everyone on here that you dont give a rats azz about other peoples RIGHTS......
UNTIL your RIGHTS are or have ACTUALLY BEEN infringed upon by someone smoking pot, NOTHING YOU SAY is valid, period.....
Let's try a little experiment... Take the constitution in one hand, and some marijuana in the other and stop by your local police station. Explain to them that the law is unconstitutional and that you have every right to smoke your marijuana in their lobby.
Definition of Controlled Substance Schedules
Drugs and other substances that are considered controlled substances under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) are divided into five schedules.* An updated and complete list of the schedules is published annually in*Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) §§ 1308.11 through 1308.15.* Substances are placed in their respective schedules based on whether they have a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, their relative abuse potential, and likelihood of causing dependence when abused.* Some examples of the drugs in each schedule are listed below.
Schedule I Controlled Substances
Substances in this schedule have no currently accepted medical use in the United States, a lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision, and a high potential for abuse.
Some examples of substances listed in Schedule I are: heroin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), marijuana (cannabis), peyote, methaqualone, and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine ("Ecstasy").
Schedule II/IIN Controlled Substances (2/2N)
Substances in this schedule have a high potential for abuse which may lead to severe psychological or physical dependence.
Examples of Schedule II narcotics include: hydromorphone (Dilaudid®), methadone (Dolophine®), meperidine (Demerol®), oxycodone (OxyContin®, Percocet®), and fentanyl (Sublimaze®, Duragesic®).* Other Schedule II narcotics include: morphine, opium, codeine, and hydrocodone.
Examples of Schedule IIN stimulants include: amphetamine (Dexedrine®, Adderall®), methamphetamine (Desoxyn®), and methylphenidate (Ritalin®).
Other Schedule II substances include: amobarbital, glutethimide, and pentobarbital.
Schedule III/IIIN Controlled Substances (3/3N)
Substances in this schedule have a potential for abuse less than substances in Schedules I or II and abuse may lead to moderate or low physical dependence or high psychological dependence.
Examples of Schedule III narcotics include: products containing not more than 90 milligrams of codeine per dosage unit (Tylenol with Codeine®), and buprenorphine (Suboxone®).
Examples of Schedule IIIN non-narcotics include: benzphetamine (Didrex®), phendimetrazine, ketamine, and anabolic steroids such as Depo®-Testosterone.
Schedule IV Controlled Substances
Substances in this schedule have a low potential for abuse relative to substances in Schedule III.
Examples of Schedule IV substances include: alprazolam (Xanax®), carisoprodol (Soma®), clonazepam (Klonopin®), clorazepate (Tranxene®), diazepam (Valium®), lorazepam (Ativan®), midazolam (Versed®), temazepam (Restoril®), and triazolam (Halcion®).
Schedule V Controlled Substances
Substances in this schedule have a low potential for abuse relative to substances listed in Schedule IV and consist primarily of preparations containing limited quantities of certain narcotics.
Examples of Schedule V substances include: cough preparations containing not more than 200 milligrams of codeine per 100 milliliters or per 100 grams (Robitussin AC®, Phenergan with Codeine®), and ezogabine.
Secondly, pot is a schedule one drug for only one reason, THC cures cancer.
Smoking an hallucinogenic drug and then doing anything with guns is just plain ignorant and blocking people from mixing the two is not a violation of rights. It would be a violation of everyone else's rights to safety letting a drug charged pot smoker do anything with guns. Falure to reconize that, shows bad judgment.
Perhaps you would be ok with your right to free speech to be taken away? Didnt think so..... Those of us arguing with you arent trying to take it away, we are DEFENDING it.... Yet you think that ANYTHING you dont like or agree with is "fair game" to be infringed upon, and you think it is WE who dont understand "RIGHTS"? oh my....
Smoking an hallucinogenic drug and then doing anything with guns is just plain ignorant and blocking people from mixing the two is not a violation of rights. It would be a violation of everyone else's rights to safety letting a drug charged pot smoker do anything with guns. Falure to reconize that, shows bad judgment.
What would that be? the part where I call you out on wanting to infringe on everyones RIGHTS for doing something you dont like?Oh stop with the bull$h!t. People getting dumber than they already are by smoking dope isn't going to improve society. We've got enough idiots. Look at Denver if you need proof.
And HER DRINKING herself to DEATH is OUR FAULT???? WTF?
I would say that the odds are 100% in favor of it being more YOUR fault than ours... her being YOUR SISTER and all....
Kinda harsh, I know, but hey, YOU ARE SAYING IT IS OK WITH YOU (and those like you) THAT WHATEVER YOU PERSONALLY DONT LIKE CAN AND SHOULD BE AN UNLAWFUL ACT.....(in YOUR WORDS, a MAJOR FELONY) and I dont take those kinds of THREATS to my liberty very well.....
There you go again spouting off 100% bullcrap and knowing nothing of what you speak of... Are you a politician by chance?
What would that be? the part where I call you out on wanting to infringe on everyones RIGHTS for doing something you dont like?
Why can't it be enough for it to be illegal to actually commit a criminal act with a gun? Why does it have to be illegal to simply carry it? That's like saying let's fix the drunk driving problem by making it illegal to carry car keys under the influence.