Please show me a post where I said that. The number of case in which the robber just starts shooting people is vanishing small. From what I’ve read it appears to me that in the instances where the robber does start shooting it’s a planned event and there are definite precursors that I believe you have noted yourself.
Gladly:
Got to go with Rich S on this one, I don’t carry a gun to defend Waffle House’s insured cash register. If I am not directly involved and it looks like the robber is going to take the money and run I’m going to let him.
If I had to get involved I most certainly am not going to attempt to apprehend anyone I am going to open fire and continue to fire until one of us is on the ground
And, I must ask, exactly what are these precursors that you talk about that will inform you if a robber's intention is to shoot or not? It's obviously not the fact that he has a knife or a gun in his hand with his finger on the trigger.
As I have stated numerous times I am absolutely convinced that in 998 out of 1000 (not the same as 98 out of 100) I would put your wife and kids at more risk of harm by starting a gun fight than by doing nothing. Why would you want me to do something that I think is going to endanger your family?
And what we are saying is a guy comes in with a knife and stabs a couple people; exactly how are you endangering my family any less by deciding to shoot him then after the attack, rather than shooting him when he was making the threat to stab people with the knife in his hand before he had the chance to follow through on his threat.
Treo, Rich_S.....you guys like to play the odds and put your trust in the criminal. I won't put my trust in the criminal that he won't hurt me, my family, and even innocent strangers. Criminals are not trustworthy. If they were trustworthy, they wouldn't be criminals, they would be law abiding citizens. I would rather trust my life and my family's with Smith and Wesson and Hornady.