Recognizing THREATS

mmckee1952

New member
Some people believe they can avoid criminal activity by simply avoiding ‘bad’ areas. True, a person may be more likely to be attacked in certain locales, but people can be victimized virtually anywhere. The best way to avoid attacks when you are out and about is to recognize and address threats before they lead to dangerous conflict.


On the street, how does a criminal decide who to attack?

After a bad guy decides to commit a crime, he needs a victim—preferably someone oblivious to danger and who is likely to be afraid to fight back when attacked. Bad guys often ‘test’ their potential victim by asking for a match, the time or something similar, an action that reveals whether the individual will allow his or her personal space to be violated.

How can a gun owner avoid looking like a good target?

Guns do not magically keep criminals away. Awareness is the best deterrent. The vast majority of criminals are opportunists who only strike when presented with a good opportunity. Remove the opportunity and you dramatically reduce the risk you face.

How does one learn how to effectively observe and detect risk?

On the street, we must mentally ‘shift gears’ to match the threat level we encounter. There is a sliding scale of readiness, starting with an oblivious, unprepared state and moving all the way to a condition of being ready to fight instantly and with lethal violence if forced.

Shouldn’t we simply live prepared to instantly fight back when required?

We can’t observe effectively if we are stuck at either end of this spectrum. At the bottom of the scale, we will fall victim to an accident or to a criminal, eventually. On the other hand, we can’t go through the day with our hand on our holstered pistol. Our threat response needs to move up and down the scale as both observation and circumstances change.

What are the psychological problems the average person must overcome when attacked?

Most of us face three psychological difficulties: recognizing the threat in time to react; understanding and accepting that severe harm or death is likely; and overcoming reluctance to respond to that threat by responding violently against another human being.

How can we overcome these three problems?

We overcome these problems by moving along the sliding threat scale. The lowest level on the scale allows us to be in an oblivious, daydreaming, preoccupied state. The next level is that of general alertness—heads up and eyes searching. Still higher is identification of a specific threat. The final level is being psychologically prepared to fight.

What happens when we reach that final level—when we are prepared to fight?

When we believe a threat is real, we are waiting on a ‘mental trigger’ - a specific, predetermined action on a bad guy’s part that will result in our immediate, aggressive, defensive reaction. By having a ‘pre-made decision’ set up in our mind, we can move fast enough to deal with the problem and not waste time deciding what to do.

What is that trigger?

The mental trigger will differ depending on the circumstances. It could be, “I’ve told him to stop; if he moves one more step toward me with that tire iron, I’ll shoot.” Whatever the trigger is, once it is pulled, we must take immediate action against the bad guy.

Do criminals really fear gun-carrying citizens?

Yes. In fact, criminals fear the armed citizen more than the police—armed citizens are unpredictable. They resist attacks, and they shoot back. Most bad guys will avoid an attack on a random person they believe might be armed. The most common behavioral difference between the armed and unarmed citizen often is awareness.
 
mmckee1952,
Regardless of the value of the content in these posts you make, the fact that you do not credit the people who actually performed the work proves you have no integrity and you are a thief.
 
mmckee1952,
Regardless of the value of the content in these posts you make, the fact that you do not credit the people who actually performed the work proves you have no integrity and you are a thief.

Someone is grumpy LOL

McKee,

I find your posts very educational, please continue...

^ Source = Me :p
 
mmckee1952,
Regardless of the value of the content in these posts you make, the fact that you do not credit the people who actually performed the work proves you have no integrity and you are a thief.

These are sent to me from various E-mails and they don't arttach where they got the and if I feel they are informative and could be used to assist other people who might find them useful I put then out there, BUT if you find that offensive DON'T read them.
 
These are sent to me from various E-mails and they don't arttach where they got the and if I feel they are informative and could be used to assist other people who might find them useful I put then out there, BUT if you find that offensive DON'T read them.
I don't read any of your threads. Virtually all of them since you started here are uncredited. I only scan them to see if you have changed your spots. The fact that you are a part of and an enabler of thieves with no integrity doesn't justify what you do either. When praise of the post comes in you don't deny credit, you bask in it.
 
These are sent to me from various E-mails and they don't arttach where they got the and if I feel they are informative and could be used to assist other people who might find them useful I put then out there, BUT if you find that offensive DON'T read them.
Dude.. if you didn't write it then before you post it YOU need to search for the author/publisher YOURSELF and give credit where credit is due. You know.. that "personal integrity" thing.

And I say this not because I'm being grumpy... but because if you don't you just might find yourself in court. Disregard that if you want.

What is really sad is you have already posted many articles without even mentioning that you didn't write them.
 
mmckee1952,
Regardless of the value of the content in these posts you make, the fact that you do not credit the people who actually performed the work proves you have no integrity and you are a thief.

These are sent to me from various E-mails and they don't arttach where they got the and if I feel they are informative and could be used to assist other people who might find them useful I put then out there, BUT if you find that offensive DON'T read them.

Yuck, nothing worse than email spam. Aol accounts should be closed.
 
Are these posts really news to people here? If so, I am surprised that folks don't seem to take their security very seriously.

And absolutely, taking others' stuff and sending it under one's name as if the author is plagiarism...even if you paraphrase their work.
 
Some forums have rules when it comes to copyrighted materials and they strictly enforce it. I don't know if it means if you credit the source where it's due you may post it. I have a feeling you don't get to post it, period. I'll have to go back and read the rules to see if I understood it.
 
personally i could care less who originally wrote it ..the information is good and should be passed along regardless of who wrote it as there is nothing new under the sun just told in different ways
education and information should be given freely without all this patent and copyright crap in my opinion
but that's just me
 
Is this English Composition II? lol Alas, yes if you publicly use someone's writings you are supposed to quote the source, especially if the writings are published. See, I do remember something from college!!
 
I was reading the original post and I am thinking to myself that everything in the thread content is something that anyone with half a brain should know and, if he or she does not, they will get what they will get in the way of a "scenario". As far as quickly dismissing the "avoiding bad areas", it is a centerpiece of staying safe, bar none. IF YOU ARE NOT THERE, YOU WILL NOT BE VICTIMIZED. It is the old Plaxico Burris (the wide receiver for the NY Giants when he shot himself in leg with unlicensed firearm)----he was told, "if you need a firearm to go somewhere, does it not make sense NOT to go there in the first place?" As a final comment, it was interesting to see that most repliers have questionable opinions about this thread--count me in---the words are interesting and correct but so what---if you do not use your own head to figure out these things, someone putting them down in a bunch of paragraphs will not make any difference.
 
personally i could care less who originally wrote it ..the information is good and should be passed along regardless of who wrote it as there is nothing new under the sun just told in different ways
education and information should be given freely without all this patent and copyright crap in my opinion
but that's just me
From (and the entire definition can be read at that link)

Link Removed

-snip-
A copyright is a legal device that gives the creator of a literary, artistic, musical, or other creative work the sole right to publish and sell that work. Copyright owners have the right to control the reproduction of their work, including the right to receive payment for that reproduction. An author may grant or sell those rights to others, including publishers or recording companies. Violation of a copyright is called infringement.
-snip-
bold added by me for emphasis

Ahhh... there are those pesky words copyright and "infringement"............
 
true that bikenut but i also get emails at times unknown author i post and share just because the information i feel is worth sharing........but if i cp something that has the author and all i include that part in my cp.........but still all this copyright stuff is just out of greed and silly imo even still
 
true that bikenut but i also get emails at times unknown author i post and share just because the information i feel is worth sharing........but if i cp something that has the author and all i include that part in my cp.........but still all this copyright stuff is just out of greed and silly imo even still
Allow me to give an example....

Suppose I build a house.. I "create" a house... I "own" that house. But what if I build it, I own it, and you decide to use it by living in it? Should you be able to take my property and use it as your own?

Suppose I write an article (been there done that)... I "create" a literary work.. I "own" that article just as much as I own the house I built (created) that I wrote (created) the article in.

Things that are literary, musical, or artistic works are just as much "private property" as is your home or business or any other "property" that you own.
 
societal rules of course but still bad analogy imo ......once something is published and out it shouldn't matter as far as i'm concerned now if i built a house and someone liked it so much they copied the design brick by brick to have one of their own it wouldn't bother me in the least ........in fact i would feel honored someone liked it well enought to make a copy of it for themselves
 
societal rules of course but still bad analogy imo ......once something is published and out it shouldn't matter as far as i'm concerned now if i built a house and someone liked it so much they copied the design brick by brick to have one of their own it wouldn't bother me in the least ........in fact i would feel honored someone liked it well enought to make a copy of it for themselves
If someone builds another house brick by brick they created another house... but if someone takes the bricks from my house to build one of their own they "stole" my house.

Copying a literary work is similar to stealing the bricks from my house since you didn't go get your own words (bricks)... you took mine.

And it isn't "societal rules" but creative works are legally considered "private property"....

Edited to fix my fumble fingered spmelding mistakes...
 
I agree the Op needs to cite the source; even if it's only an email address. But, it may not be altogether illegal.

Unless the original author states that they hold all the rights to their writings and protects his material with something like this-
Copyright © 2012. All Rights Reserved.
, the originator may not have much of a legal claim to the material.

I have authored several items and I've had my stuff stolen before; even though I use a "Copyright" notice in some of my online articles. It bugs me to see people take it & make money with it. But, it can be very difficult & costly to bring a lawsuit so, I just have to live with it.

What concerns me about people that post "Copyrighted" material is that I have seen TWO firearm forum owners sued and loose their forums. I have also seen two more forums get sued and almost go under. So, we really do need to be careful about posting material without citing the source.

Please take that into consideration OP!

-
 

New Threads

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
49,531
Messages
610,692
Members
75,032
Latest member
BLACKROCK6
Back
Top