Situation #2 is a little different ..."the suspect charged the cruiser and pointed a gun at the officer, who was still behind the wheel". In this case, the officers life was in imminent danger. In the first example, the officer is going about regular business. Your scenario in the first incident did not indicate that the officer was in any imminent danger, simply that he had the suspects at gunpoint. In the second scenario the officer is being "charged" (attacked) and the suspect is pointing a gun at the officer. who is in a position of vulnerability (still seated).
If you can't see the difference between a BG sitting in a vehicle with a gun in the rear Vs. a badguy charging you with a gun pointed at you then I recommend a refresher course.
.
I think he's pointing out the a non-LEO joined a pursuit, not the actions following...
exactly...hence the bolded portion... :yes4:
He pulled his gun and returned fire and his Glock jammed on him.
I call B.S!
lol jk
... his Glock jammed on him.
I'm sure the glook fans will claim this is the first time in recorded history this has happened.
Should bought a sig. :biggrin:
Link Removed
I was referring to the "live fire training exercise." It wasn't in bold letters, I don't understand where the "hence the bold" comment comes from, no need to snip. .
No...no snipping..."hence the bold" was a reply to Post #21 which was a reply to Post #18...nothing about your question/comments at all. :redface:
I'm sure he / she wouldn't mind...
Police show badges, but we have nothing that will readily identify us positively as an honest citizen.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?