There is not a single thing in the proposed treaty that calls for disarming any individual based on age. The article linked from the Sheeple website in the OP is an absolute lie and nothing but propaganda. It's a bit ironic that it somes from a source called "sheeple" since those are the only type of people who'd swallow such a lie hook, line, and sinker......sheep who don't think for themselves. Don't be a sheeple and don't believe everything you hear/read no matter how much you want to.
I can't stand propaganda (read: outright lies and calculated misinformation) even if it's created to further something I believe in. It makes its creators look desperate as well as those who push it along (not to mention making the "believers" look like ignorant suckers). I'm against the treaty for a variety of reasons. There's plenty of genuine things not to like about it. No need to lie about it and make "our side" look bad. Below is a link to a copy of the treaty from the UN's website published just a few days ago.
http://www.un.org/disarmament/ATT/docs/Draft_ATT_text_27_Mar_2013-E.pdf
What are your thoughts? Should we hang em up after a certain age?
I'm ove Grandmother opinion!
Source: Guns
Link Removed
The source was guns.com. The Daily Sheeple rightly attributed their reprinting of it to the correct copyright-holder. What they didn't do is quote the whole bottom of the article, which looks like this on guns.com:
What are your thoughts? Should we hang em up after a certain age?
Link Removed
I guess it worked, huh?
Outstanding rant though B2Tall. Utterly spectacular! Just too bad you got all that spittle all over your 'puter screen because of a rather obvious April Fool's joke. Now I'm kind of confused though. Would you consider yourself a fool (for getting caught in an April "Fool's" joke), a propagandist (for spreading untrue accusations about the article in the OP), or a sheeple (for following the crowd that couldn't follow the right link to the real source)? Maybe it's all of the above?
![]()
Blues
I am really hoping this is an April 1 joke.
Both the OP and the article on Sheeple were dated April 2nd.
S&W645;424930 said:Age has no bearing on who should be allowed to have guns as it is an arbitrary setting. They say 67 is the average death age but that includes countries where people don't live past 40. Dad is going to be 85 in June. Still can handle a 1911 well. But then his side of the family have been known to live to near and past the century mark.That's ridiculous. My grandfathe- in-law is 83 and we just recently had to take his rifles away because his dementia has set in so badly. I agree that people who are not conscious of what they are doing anymore shouldn't have access to firearms but that decision should be made on a case by case basis and by the family member or caretaker of that person, NOT the government. Disarming everybody 55 and older? GTFO
I'm 57 years old and in good health and great physical condition for any age, jogging, lifting weights, and working out on the heavy bag 5 days a week. If anyone thinks that they are going to take my guns due to age or any other reason.....COME AND TAKE THEM!!!!!
I thought it was funny! You don't? :haha:
Now there is a bumper sticker!!!Molon labe!!! You sons-a-b!tches!!!
The real joke is that in the year 2012 there are people that think this is a good idea. Or perhaps i should say there are US Senators that dont think ths is a bad idea. This is progressiveism at its worst. Remember this warning. Not all Democrats are anti gunners. BUT ALMOST ALL ANTI GUNNERS ARE DEMOCRATS. SO stay home on election stay home on election day and watch what happens next. Then scratch your ass and wonder what happened.I don't think it's funny to leave out the proof that it was indeed a joke, no I don't. I don't think it was funny, smart or right for the Daily Sheeple to leave out that proof in their reprinting the piece either. The further buried the proof gets in any thread about any subject, the more posts will come treating a joke as legitimate commentary on a serious subject. The justification for treating the UN gun treaty as a joke, if there really was ever such a thing, passed at 0001 hours on April 2nd. I hope Mr. Hanson has been seet straight that it was a joke, but I don't visit that side of the site, so I don't know. Did you set him or his readers straight? Or do you think the UN treaty is joke-worthy?![]()
Blues
The real joke is that in the year 2012 there are people that think this is a good idea. Or perhaps i should say there are US Senators that dont think ths is a bad idea. This is progressiveism at its worst. Remember this warning. Not all Democrats are anti gunners. BUT ALMOST ALL ANTI GUNNERS ARE DEMOCRATS. SO stay home on election stay home on election day and watch what happens next. Then scratch your ass and wonder what happened.