Signs of the End of the Age & The Last Generation
- Thread starter Ringo
- Start date
- Status
Ringo
A WATCHMAN
XD40scinNC..."You can say you're about loving your neighbor but unless your actions start matching your words, it's pure hypocrisy".
If a parent loves their children then that parent will responsibly warn their children of danger and instructs their children in how to avoid the adverse consequences of such dangers. As Christians we are commanded by our God to love our neighbor as ourselves, therefor, in obedience and because we love our neighbor we do our utmost to warn them of the dangers of their ignorance of God's word and in "love" instruct them in how to avoid the adverse eternal consequences of their sinful,rebellious actions & behavior. Just like the rebellious youth shaking their defiant fist in the face of their loving parents in response to the warnings expressed through their "love", you as a neighbor follow suit and misinterpret an act of "love" as HATE, shake your fist in the face of your Christian neighbors and retaliate with insults and blasphemy.
If a parent loves their children then that parent will responsibly warn their children of danger and instructs their children in how to avoid the adverse consequences of such dangers. As Christians we are commanded by our God to love our neighbor as ourselves, therefor, in obedience and because we love our neighbor we do our utmost to warn them of the dangers of their ignorance of God's word and in "love" instruct them in how to avoid the adverse eternal consequences of their sinful,rebellious actions & behavior. Just like the rebellious youth shaking their defiant fist in the face of their loving parents in response to the warnings expressed through their "love", you as a neighbor follow suit and misinterpret an act of "love" as HATE, shake your fist in the face of your Christian neighbors and retaliate with insults and blasphemy.
XD40scinNC
New member
Where the hell did that come from? You might need to call EMS and tell them you think you are having mini-strokes (TIA's).
I spend over 30 years as a first-responder/volunteer firefighter putting my butt on the line to help neighbors, but I don't 'love' them. Today I am friends with many, barely know others, and a one or two I don't trust at all.
You christians are they hypocrites preaching your love then spewing hate toward those that are different the next minute.
Ringo
A WATCHMAN
You don't know your own signature?
XD40scinNC
New member
"The fundamental ethos of Christianity is tolerance, caring for those in need, etc., but that is not what today's Christianity is about. You can say you're about loving your neighbor but unless your actions start matching your words, it's pure hypocrisy."
Hey numb nuts, that is directed AT christians, such as yourself, specifically those that claim to be tolerant christians while spewing their hate towards those that are different, or have different views. You are the poster child for my signature line, hypocrite.
In another thread you just attacked someone that clearly believes in god, but in your opinion belongs to the wrong church, hypocrite!
Do you even know the meaning of word tolerance?
Farmhood
New member
Work your magic get another thread closed...be careful you don't get banned.
sinful nature is always hostile to God....
NotTwoShure
Well-known member
XD40scinNC
New member
Well clearly he doesn't recognize that my signature is directed AT christians. Bigoted blindness, or simply a reading comprehension problem. Do you suffer from the same malady?
As for the message in my signature line, what part of that truth do you think is a ban able offense?
If you went to church today and found that the church was not full of hypocrites, that only means that there were empty seats.
Link Removed
Firefighterchen
OC for Tactical Advantage
...not to burst the atheist bashing...but I think the last two people to get banned and have threads get closed were christians...
XD40scinNC
New member
| What Christians Say | How Christians Live |
|---|---|
| God loves unconditionally | Offer His love with a set of conditions |
| Jesus came not to judge but to save the world | Tell everyone bad things are God’s judgement for them sinning |
| God is the creator of the world and loved the world He created | We couldn’t care less what happens to the planet – “it’s just going to burn up anyway” |
| Love the sinner, hate the sin | Love to tell the sinner God hates their sin |
| God so loved the world that He sent His only Son | We so hate the world that we judge and protest their actions |
| We will be known for our love | We are mostly known for our unloving behavior towards people we don’t agree with |
| Love your neighbour as you love yourself | We love our neighbours to the degree they believe like ourselves |
| God chooses to not remember your sins | Spend our whole time pointing out sins |
| All sin is equal we all need grace | We run around condemning people for certain sins (usually the ones we don’t struggle with), all the while allowing countless sins in our lives to go unchecked |
| We are a priesthood of believers, temples of the holy God | We need a temple and a priest to hear from God |
<tbody>
</tbody>
Farmhood
New member
That's like saying the last car recall was a ford
sinful nature is always hostile to God....
Firefighterchen
OC for Tactical Advantage
if you don't like broad brushes...id suggest you get a better paint set to share.
Ringo
A WATCHMAN
Ringo
A WATCHMAN
A September to Remember
Ringo
A WATCHMAN
Pope Francis Calls For A New Global Political Authority To Save Humanity
By Michael Snyder
Pope Francis says that global warming is a fact and that a new global political authority is necessary in order to save humanity from utter disaster. The new encyclical that was scheduled to be released on Thursday has been leaked, and it is being reported that this new global political authority that Pope Francis envisions would be in charge of “the reduction of pollution and the development of poor countries and regions”. The funny thing is that this sounds very much in line with the new sustainable development agenda that is going to be launched at the United Nations in September. This radical new agenda is already being called “Agenda 21 on steroids” because it goes so much farther than Agenda 21 ever did. The new UN agenda does not just address the environment – it also addresses issues such as poverty, agriculture, education and gender equality. It is essentially a blueprint for governing the entire planet, and that sounds very much like what Pope Francis also wants. In fact, Pope Francis is going to give the speech that kicks off the UN conference in September where this new sustainable agenda will be launched. For some reason, this Pope has decided to make the fight against climate change the central pillar of his papacy, and he is working very hard to unite as much of humanity as possible to get behind that effort.
It is not an accident that this new encyclical is coming out now. An article from the Guardian even states that the release was intended “to have maximum public impact” prior to the Pope’s major speech at the UN in September…
The rare encyclical, called “Laudato Sii”, or “Praised Be”, has been timed to have maximum public impact ahead of the pope’s meeting with Barack Obama and his address to the US Congress and the UN general assembly in September.
It is also intended to improve the prospect of a strong new UN global agreement to cut climate emissions. By adding a moral dimension to the well-rehearsed scientific arguments, Francis hopes to raise the ambition of countries above their own self-interest to secure a strong deal in a crucial climate summit in Paris in November.
Much of the encyclical is not that surprising. But what is raising eyebrows is the Pope’s call for a new global political authority. Here is more from the Guardian…
Pope Francis will this week call for changes in lifestyles and energy consumption to avert the “unprecedented destruction of the ecosystem” before the end of this century, according to a leaked draft of a papal encyclical. In a document released by an Italian magazine on Monday, the pontiff will warn that failure to act would have “grave consequences for all of us”.
Francis also called for a new global political authority tasked with “tackling … the reduction of pollution and the development of poor countries and regions”. His appeal echoed that of his predecessor, pope Benedict XVI, who in a 2009 encyclical proposed a kind of super-UN to deal with the world’s economic problems and injustices.
What is even more alarming is who will be on the stage with the Pope when this encyclical is formally released. John Schellnhuber is a German professor that has some very radical views on climate change. For instance, he believes that our planet is overpopulated by at least six billion people…
Professor John Schellnhuber has been chosen as a speaker for the Vatican’s rolling out of a Papal document on climate change. He’s the professor who previously said the planet is overpopulated by at least six billion people. Now, the Vatican is giving him a platform which many expect will result in an official Church declaration in support of radical depopulation in the name of “climate science.”
And Schellnhuber also happens to believe that we need a new global political authority. If he had his way, there would be an “Earth Constitution”, a “Global Council” directly elected by the people of the planet, and a “Planetary Court” that would be above all other courts on the globe. The following is an excerpt from a very disturbing piece that he authored…
Let me conclude this short contribution with a daydream about those key institutions that could bring about a sophisticated — and therefore more appropriate — version of the conventional “world government” notion. Global democracy might be organized around three core activities, namely (i) an Earth Constitution; (ii) a Global Council; and (iii) a Planetary Court. I cannot discuss these institutions in any detail here, but I would like to indicate at least that:
– the Earth Constitution would transcend the UN Charter and identify those first principles guiding humanity in its quest for freedom, dignity, security and sustainability;
– the Global Council would be an assembly of individuals elected directly by all people on Earth, where eligibility should be not constrained by geographical, religious, or cultural quotas; and
– the Planetary Court would be a transnational legal body open to appeals from everybody, especially with respect to violations of the Earth Constitution.
Does the Pope want something similar?
It is quite telling that Schellnhuber was invited to stand with the Pope as this major encyclical is released to the world. Did Schellnhuber play a role in drafting it? Has he been advising the Pope on these matters? Does the Pope share his vision of the future?
And does the Pope share Schellnhuber’s belief that our planet is currently overpopulated by six billion people? If so, how would the Pope solve that “problem”?
Without a doubt, most of those that make up the “global elite” would love to see the number of people on earth decline precipitously. This is something that I covered in my previous article entitled “46 Population Control Quotes That Show How Badly The Elite Want To Wipe Us All Out“. Of course the Pope is not going to publicly advocate for getting rid of six billion people, but clearly he is extremely concerned about the impact that all of us are having on this planet.
The funny thing is that the earth is not even warming. In fact, there has been no sign of global warming at all for the past ten years…
Over the years the government and the scientific community have largely stood their ground when it comes to climate change. They’ve been adamant in their assertion that the planet is gradually warming due to human activity, and that we all need to do our part to stop climate change. However, the data provided by the scientific community doesn’t always jibe with their claims.
At least, that seems to be the case with the data coming out of NOAA’s climate monitoring stations. They have a series of 114 stations across all 50 states, which is known as the US Climate Reference Network. For the past 10 years they’ve shown no sign of global warming. In fact, there’s been a very slight cooling in temperatures across the US.
But at this point, most of the world has bought into the propaganda. In most industrialized nations, a solid majority of the population actually believes that climate change is the greatest threat that humanity currently faces.
And since just about all forms of human activity produce “carbon emissions” or affect the environment in some way, it gives control freaks that dream of global government a good excuse to grab more power. They will always say that it is about “saving humanity” or “saving the planet”, but ultimately everything that they are trying to accomplish would mean more power in their hands.
NotTwoShure
Well-known member
SR9
New member
Atheist,
I would be interested in knowing, what was the point or thing in your life that convinced you that there is no God. A point that you knew for a fact that God could not exist, and you were not going to believe, no matter what? Was it your parents teaching, a college professor, the loss of someone close to you? Be specific please.
I would be interested in knowing, what was the point or thing in your life that convinced you that there is no God. A point that you knew for a fact that God could not exist, and you were not going to believe, no matter what? Was it your parents teaching, a college professor, the loss of someone close to you? Be specific please.
I was raised a catholic and switch to Lutheran in my earlier 20's. In my 40's I was on my church council and taught Sunday school. Then I started reading the bible from cover to cover and noticing how outrageous the stories were. Then I started looking for any evidence of the existence of any supernatural beings. It wasn't long before I realized that there is no evidence of the existence of supernatural beings other than the regurgitation of their existence by people who think supernatural beings exists.
Moreover, it became apparent that most of the believers are hypocrites - the first thing they do when faced with an event that might take them to be in everlasting happiness with their imaginary sky daddy is pray not to go. and if they are saved from death they "thank God" - for what - for giving them the opportunity to stay here and suffer?
A similar problem arises with those who own firearms for self-defense. Why is it they don't want to let someone else send them to be in everlasting happiness with their supernatural buddy?
The lack of evidence for supernatural beings leads to 2 possibilities:
1. there are no supernatural beings.
2. there are supernatural beings who purposefully left no evidence of thie existence and all those people making up BS about them are going to be sentenced to eternal damnation for doing so when they die.
Given those 2 possibilities, not believing in things for which there is no evidence makes the most sense. Making up BS about supernatural beings is a sure loser.
- Status
