Chen: You seem to want to be adversarial to most anything posted other than your opinions. And to say Americans are judgemental of others?
Is being adversarial bad? How can ones expression of opinion be adversarial, and anothers not?
Being adversarial is not the same as judgmental.
First, let me ask, are you an American? Chen would seem to be an Asian name so are you of Asian descent? If so, it would seem your ancestors came here to be Americans and make their mark. Why? Things are better in America than most places in the world? Most of us think so but we are not judgemental for that reason.
I'm an American. My grandparents came here to expand their wealth, as my family in Taiwan are already doing fine. Your why is invalid when talking about my family.
Personally, I think Americans are judgemental of those who do not pull their weight in our society and try to participate in making the American dream for everyone.
Which is fine, but it seems some here have decided to judge others not by the weight they pull, but by their willingness to serve this government or not.
Now, if you want to argue about something, grab a handful of that theory and run with it. If you are talking about disagreement with someone, we, including you, are all guilty of that. We all have opinions and are not hesitant to express them and, regardless of the subject, there will be some who will take exception to another's opinion and have a "hissy fit." That is southern for a tantrum, if you didn't know.
Is this an accusation towards me or just an observation in general towards everyone?
Your remark about civilians outnumbering the military 20:1 indicates you look at the military/veterans as adversaries. Why? What harm have we done to you or do you expect from us?
Human history, governments have killed more civilians in human history than any other group, and guess who they used? They're own militaries. Do I need to wait till I'm harmed to prepare?
As for future rolls for the military, particularly against the civilian populace, we can only speculate what they may be required to do but I don't expect it to be as bad as some are trying to say. Remember the stand-off at Clive Bundy's ranch? I think the government found out there that we, as a nation, are tired of heavy-handed rule and subjugation of all civilians will be an undertaking they may not wish to try.
I remember, I also remember Katrina and Boston. Who will I side with? The People, not the government...and the military takes orders from who?
Your remark about the military separating themselves from the rest of the populace indicates to me just how little you know about the military. WE are YOU! We are citizens as well as you and have as much regard for the country as you. We are not separate....we are all melded together for a common goal. We do not question your patriotism because you are in a different career field. You do your thing and we do/did ours and the world continues to go round and round. Doesn't get much better than that!Link Removed
Why is it that so many people are "too good" to serve and defend "their" country? "Let the other guy do it." "Only idiots join the military." I heard it all for many years, especially as an Army recruiter. The same people are the ones that put flags on their cars for a week or so after 9/11. Part time patriots, I guess you could say. When I was growing up in the fifties I was taught that serving our country was a duty. Part of being an American.
Sure sounds like there is judgment of patriotism and even being an American based on career fields in the above post.
I'm not the one acting as if military experience should dictate a separate class of people worthy of public office, nor would it surprise me if that same group would require it for our other natural rights. That's you guys. I merely recognized it.
Sent from my HTCONE using USA Carry mobile app