Treo
Bullet Proof
I heart NavyLT. Smart guy. Good common sense.
If he had any common sense he'd be ARMYCPT. instead of NavyLT (WTF y'all deleted my favorite smiley?)
I heart NavyLT. Smart guy. Good common sense.
At the risk of opening a huge bag of worms, I'd like opinions on how to carry.
I got slapped a little for posting the way I concealed carry, so I'm respectfully requesting informed opinions.
I carry a Walther PK.380 in a small shoulder bag, worn diagonal. (Though right now I'm not carrying, because the gun wore an outline into the bag and I need to find a replacement).
Shoulder or hip carry is not really an option. Plus, if I have to think about carrying every morning, I probably won't do it. That's just how it is, so don't get stuck berating me on the deeper psychological implications of choice.
OK, so the real issue is this: I carry my gun hammer down, empty chamber.
My hands are pretty small, and I can't reach the safety with my thumb when I'm gripping my pistol. Plus the safety is a little stiff.
Using logic, I figured I would carry safety off, hammer down, empty chamber.
If I rack a round into the pistol, it's automatically cocked and ready to fire. In my mind, this is quicker than fumbling with the safety.
However, I'm open to ideas.
Obviously I carry because I want to be able to protect myself or others in dangerous situations, and obviously I'm weighing the risks of carrying in a bag, no chambered round, against the benefits of having a firearm in a bad situation.
I really don't like the idea of carrying a pistol with the hammer pulled back--safety or no. There's just something about it that doesn't sit right with me.
So, barring getting another firearm, which isn't practical for money reasons as well as fit, is there a best way to carry this gun to both protect me and guard against accidental discharge?
Try to be civil, boys....
Doc Mustang already pointed out that what you originally thought was a weird discovery was actually a design feature of the PK380. Several people were giving you well intentioned advice without realizing that this gun has some rather unique features. Using those features, it is just as safe to carry as any other double action semiauto pistol, with or without a round chambered, and with or without the safety on. I carry all of my double actions chambered, with the safety off. The PK380 would be no different, at least not by virtue of its' design. The gun is desgned to be decocked with the safety on, just as you discovered. The safety is a hammer block, so the gun cannot fire when the safety is engaged, even when you pull the trigger to drop the hammer.
Several comments were made about the inherent unsafe nature of carrying a firearm loosely inside a purse, which I would generally be inclined to agree with, but your original post somewhat gave me the impression that the gun wasn't simply tossed in with the other purse contents. The possibility of other contents of the purse getting into the trigger guard would be the determining factor for me on whether the safety should be on or off. There could also be an issue with purse contents catching a hammer that is drawn back, if you carry that way. Even with the safety on, carrying a firearm in a purse mingled in with other contents invites all manner of possible failure scenarios that are best to avoid. The firearm should be in a compartment by itself, and should be held securely in a consistent draw position.
You said that you aren't interested in a different gun, though several people seemed to have ignored that comment. I assume your reluctance is due either to a lack of money or to having expended a lot of effort to locate this gun in the first place, and not wanting to go through that again. If that position should change and you decide you may want to buy a new gun or trade for a different one, I would like to offer a word of caution. I have seen recommendations for Glocks here. You should never, ever, ever carry a Glock loosely in a purse, pocket or anywhere else. The triggers on Glocks are very light compared to other guns and they are well known for their high rate of accidental/negligent discharges. Don't get me wrong. I love Glocks. I have two and my wife has one. You just have to exercise a high degree of diligence when handling and carrying them, and it seems that quite a few people don't do that, or at least don't do it very well.
I won't add to the on body vs. off body debate. I think all the relevant points have already been made there, and you seem to be contemplating them just as you should be at this point. My wife is going through the same debate.
I cannot stress enough the comments made by Doc Mustang, RJT CCW and others that practice is of paramount importance no matter what carry method you decide to use. And your practice doesn't have to be fancy either. Not all practice requires trips to the range. Most of the drills you need for concealed carry can be done without ever firing the weapon, yet far too many people never practice them. Don't be one of those people.
Yeah, and too bad for you he's married. After two broken engagements, I'm retired. And Kelcarry is probably too sour for your tastes. That leaves either Treo or BigGayAl.
If he had any common sense he'd be ARMYCPT. instead of NavyLT (WTF y'all deleted my favorite smiley?)
Ummm.... no. I was in the Army National Guard for 4 1/2 years before enlisting in the Navy.
It's that common sense thing localgirl talks about.
OK I'm just going to end this here and now
Navy loses Army wins
This is all proof that the Army has nothing to worry about with the repeal of DADT. And maybe the Navy can meet their recruiting goals now. :sarcastic: