I wouldn't live in any state that required me to register firearms OR get a license to merely own them.
Great? You mean having to register my firearms and have them listed on my license? I have three words for you: NO, I REFUSE. Nobody's imposing that New York garbage on Ohio.
An "assault rifle" is exactly what the National Firearms Act of 1934 says it is. In Ohio, there's no such thing as an "assault weapon", which has no fixed meaning in any case.
Without REGISTRATION, it's UTTERLY worthless.
HOW did Chicago implement it's handgun BAN???
I don't believe those words mean what you think they do.
Yeah Chicago is a great example of how adults should behavior with firearms. More like ******* animals. Chicago is a great example why you need FFL'S to evaluate everyone and rejected most of you
Those words do not mean we should go back to behaving like animals or like the wild west before we had Law in the country.
You remind me of the "roving ambassador" for the Taliban who was on NPR shortly before 9/11.
You're starting to sound like a typical AHSA troll, futilely attempting to bamboozle those "dumb gun nuts".
But only in the most shallow and superficial way. I've never seen any evidence that he has either the intelligence or the powers of concentration to master the doctrine.
You're incapable of judging.
What's the matter? Can't answer the question? Or are you just another AHSA troll, too DISHONEST to answer?
Thing is... even when we have law in the country the criminals STILL act like animals because they don't give two farts in a windstorm about the law. But then, you are blaming the law abiding for the actions of the lawless thinking that restricting the law abiding will somehow restrain the lawless.... and that is a form of self delusion that anti gun folks use to mask their desperate desire to be in control of other people's rights.
Chicago is a perfect example of how the delusion that restricting the law abiding will restrain the lawless............ doesn't work in the real world.
