NDS
New member
...In the end, the incident was one of the criminal's making, not the self-defense shooter. If he didn't want to get shot in the back, there was an easy way for him to accomplish that... don't be a criminal that day.
Exactly the point of this exercise. If criminals don't want to be harmed they should find other work. When people are damaged, by personal attack or some form of theft, they become upset. When you upset people they may strike back. Had this woman been a cop, any accomplices would have been charged in this criminals death. That's not something I agree with, but it shows the multi-layer of standards we have built in this nation. This woman is blameless in protecting her property (TEXAS people, she is within the law of her state-- CA and CT please note that some people are more free than others) and any injury / damage the criminal suffers is his fault for initiating the confrontation.