B
Bikenut
Guest
.
Thank you for providing a very good reason to OC since with OC the gun in plain sight leaves absolutely no doubt in the bad guys' mind who would be a poor choice to rob.
Now... to continue so as not to derail the discussion...
What is ironic is that presently those who already have a CPL currently can legally open carry in the PFZs that SB 59 addresses for concealed carry.
You are right. Does anyone think because a BG don't have a license that he won't carry a gun into a casino,bank,bar etc.etc. to commit a crime? I don't realy think he is gonna follow the law lol. If anything a BG would be less likely to try and rob someone coming out of a casino or bank if he's not sure who has guns and who don't.
Thank you for providing a very good reason to OC since with OC the gun in plain sight leaves absolutely no doubt in the bad guys' mind who would be a poor choice to rob.
Now... to continue so as not to derail the discussion...
The Michigan legislators who support the bill wanted the extra training in order to make the bill more acceptable to those who would oppose it. They could point to the extra training requirement and say those who pass the training are more "qualified" and therefore more "acceptable" to carry a concealed gun in the PFZs. Think of it as a spoonful of sugar to make the bill pass.Originally posted by Jason1221
Funny that's 1 thing I've always said. If they know u have it-it's only because u needed it. And then your alive to deal with any consequences. I like the idea of sb-59. But can't figure out why another 9hr class is required. I think it's just a $$$ thing so they can charge us all for another license.
What is ironic is that presently those who already have a CPL currently can legally open carry in the PFZs that SB 59 addresses for concealed carry.