Brandishing? or just target practice?

Forgetting one thing. In America he is innocent until proven guilty. He doesn't have to prove his innocence with things like a spent round. The complainant has the burden of proof.

Ok assuming he got away with it would it be worth the hassle? I guess that's a question only the OP can answer.

That said ,I have to agree with Kwimby. I am convinced the OP saw a chance to use his gun to intimidate those folks and he was an absolute Richard about doing it then came here to brag about doing it
 
That said ,I have to agree with Kwimby. I am convinced the OP saw a chance to use his gun to intimidate those folks and he was an absolute Richard about doing it then came here to brag about doing it

That I agree with. He used poor judgment and thought he was Billy Badass, and his OP definitely comes off as bragging about it. However, just because he's under the impression owning a gun increases his pen1s size, doesn't make it illegal.
 
Ok assuming he got away with it would it be worth the hassle? I guess that's a question only the OP can answer.
I don't believe we can say he intimidated anyone. Hearing a shot down the road won't stop two wankers from beating each other. Probably only coincidental that the fighting stopped. I just can't find where any LEO even has cause to enter the property without some direct threat. There was none in the description of the event.
.
Officer are you here to effect an arrest? No? Then please get off my property. I don't answer questions.
.
As a side thought... my wife burned something on the stove last week and the alarm system triggered the FD ad PD. The alarm company called, found out it was smoke from cooking and cancelled the call but the FD and PD came anyway. I asked them why and they said our policy is to check the house anyway, not to rely on the homeowner to decide if there's sill a threat. Then the LEO wanted to go inside and check everything. I said "no." He continued "we have to, it's required." Once again, "sorry, no. Thanks for being prompt and I'll send a donation to the FD."
 
That I agree with. He used poor judgment and thought he was Billy Badass, and his OP definitely comes off as bragging about it. However, just because he's under the impression owning a gun increases his pen1s size, doesn't make it illegal.

You are quite mistaken in what you "think" I was thinking... It also was/is not my intention to brag... even if you and others think I am... and If I was going to carry a firearm to make up for a small weewee, I would be carrying one with a much longer barrel.... well, maybe I just dont want to carry one with a barrel longer than mr happy.... hmmmmm, Mr Freud?
 
You are quite mistaken in what you "think" I was thinking... It also was/is not my intention to brag... even if you and others think I am... and If I was going to carry a firearm to make up for a small weewee, I would be carrying one with a much longer barrel.... well, maybe I just dont want to carry one with a barrel longer than mr happy.... hmmmmm, Mr Freud?
People always think they understand others' thinking. They base it on how they might themselves think or react. I believe it's a reflection of themselves. And the whole pecker size thing detracts from any valid argument the other guy has. As soon as he makes the pecker-size comment he loses me. I personally like a short-barreled pocket rocket. What would Sigmund Fraud think?
 
I am 100% legal to fire off any firearm I wish at any time on my own property.... so your pulling sheet out of yer azz is only making your statements smellier....

LMAO.... OK now I wish I hadn't had Eidolon on ignore, but glad you quoted him.

Did he just say you committed felonious assault on your backyard target???

I'm dying over here with laughter. My belly hurts I'm laughing so hard. That's wonderful.

Sir, I'm arresting you for assaulting that target you just shot. Bwaaaaaa haaaa haaaaa.
 
Whether you agree or disagree, there is no need to be calling people names or having the discussion getting out of hand. If it continues I will lock the thread and ban anyone that is violating the site rules (namecalling, etc).
 
Whether you agree or disagree, there is no need to be calling people names or having the discussion getting out of hand. If it continues I will lock the thread and ban anyone that is violating the site rules (namecalling, etc).

You'd have to ban half the memebrs of this forum. I don't know if you've noticed but the name calling is normal business here
 
I cannot read every post on the forums. I respond to ones that get reported to me.
 
So not only has Axeanda45 behaved very dickishly towards his neighbors and bragged about it here, but apparently also reacted by crying to Luke because he didn't like that being pointed out and got his widdle feewings hurt. Poor baby.
 
Reading past replies, some good, some a waste of time and space. What Axeanda did appears legal in his state, and I don't care about the motives of his post. Some replies say you have a right to behave a certain way, so who cares what others think.
This is a general concern and not directed necessarily to this thread- One thing that concerns me is how others perceive our actions! We are at war with the antigunners. And in this case, if Axeanda's neighbor's did call Johnny Law and exaggerated the circumstances, even though he was within his right- if Johnny Law was against the 2nd ammendment this incident could have received a whole lot of negative press- and here we are, a bunch of gun toating rednecks! We dont need to be be giving the media or any of the antigunners the amunition they need to make their case.
BS I know, but WE do not need to be kicking the junkyard dog!! We shouldnt have to tip toe around him, but we dont need to kick him!
 
It is 100% BS that what someone ELSE does or thinks has anything to do with your rights.... Our RIGHTS exist because we do..... they can make it illegal to have or carry firearms or what have you tomorrow, and I will STILL have and carry one (or more).... You want them? come take them (and you better surprise me and bring lots of friends if you want to be successful....

EVERYONE who "supports" our "Rights" should have the same attitude.... we wouldnt have anything close to the troubles we do now if people didnt start giving in/allow infringements starting years ago.. (and had the attitude described above all along)
 
It is 100% BS that what someone ELSE does or thinks has anything to do with your rights.... Our RIGHTS exist because we do..... they can make it illegal to have or carry firearms or what have you tomorrow, and I will STILL have and carry one (or more).... You want them? come take them (and you better surprise me and bring lots of friends if you want to be successful....

EVERYONE who "supports" our "Rights" should have the same attitude.... we wouldnt have anything close to the troubles we do now if people didnt start giving in/allow infringements starting years ago.. (and had the attitude described above all along)

If you don't want (or can't handle having) your ass spanked for doing something stupid then coming here to brag about it then DON'T DO IT!!!!!
 
If you don't want (or can't handle having) your ass spanked for doing something stupid then coming here to brag about it then DON'T DO IT!!!!!
I don't see anything stupid about what he did. He threatened no one. His behavior was perfectly legal. Officer, please get off my lawn.
 
eidolon seems to be reading posts that no-one else can see, and then commenting on them.... What he quoted from me is 100% unrelated to what he seems to be going off about...... Maybe he is from some other dimension and he is cross-posting here?
 

New Threads

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
49,531
Messages
610,694
Members
75,032
Latest member
BLACKROCK6
Back
Top