Do you still conceal carry into posted "No Carry" businesses?

[corneileous]

Do you still conceal carry into posted "No Carry" businesses?

Incorrect. That is what you see. I am talking about the property owner's right to deny entry to those who carry guns. You are talking about excuses to justify disrespecting the property owner's right to deny entry to those who carry guns.

And see, that's just it. You ONLY care about a right that store owners have that gets people killed.

You only care about the "right" part yet, you're continually spouting off crap defending that "right" saying that it gets disrespected by calling it excuses that saves people's lives.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Bikenut]

Originally Posted by Bikenut View Post
It isn't me who says so... it is your own postings that say you consider private property rights so unimportant they deserve to be disrespected.

No, it's ONE. Specific. Right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, and the anti gunners have the same attitude about the right to keep and bear arms.

 

[Bikenut]

Originally Posted by Bikenut View Post
Incorrect. That is what you see. I am talking about the property owner's right to deny entry to those who carry guns. You are talking about excuses to justify disrespecting the property owner's right to deny entry to those who carry guns.

And see, that's just it. You ONLY care about a right that store owners have that gets people killed.

You only care about the "right" part yet, you're continually spouting off crap defending that "right" saying that it gets disrespected by calling excuses that save someone's lives.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Incorrect again. I care about ALL rights.

And simply staying out of a business with a no guns rule/policy is an effective way to save lives too so just not going into that business is a very good way to insure not being killed in that business.

 

[corneileous]

I stand corrected. You only don't agree with the property owner's private property right to deny entry to those who carry guns.

Ya had it right, here. What happened below??

As if the property owner's rights are unimportant. Oh wait. You have made that quite clear over and over and over ... and are still doing so.

Property owners SPECIFIC right to keep out the defensive carrier.

Again, not ALL rights.

Running out of cogent arguments?

That was a poor attempt at sarcasm because you keep on and on....

That was in no way, shape or form a compliment.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[corneileous]

Yes, and the anti gunners have the same attitude about the right to keep and bear arms.

Whatever you say, man.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Bikenut]

Originally Posted by Bikenut View Post
Of course you won't go there again.

I bet you're great at parties, aren't ya..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You don't have to be a smartarse about it. It's not like you committed a mortal sin or anything by quoting a portion of my post that really wasn't meant to be quoted by itself.

I simply said, that, and you replied in a sarcastic way asking really. So then I explained. But you're right, it doesn't matter!!...lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Indeed.

 

[corneileous]

Incorrect again. I care about ALL rights.

NO, we're not talking about ALL RIGHTS! Just this specific one!!

And simply staying out of a business with a no guns rule/policy is an effective way to save lives too so just not going into that business is a very good way to insure not being killed in that business.

I'm not just talking about me! I'm talking about everybody! Even the anti-gun people who die in these places! Everytime you spout off about the store owners rights to ban guns from his establishment, you are supporting a right that gets people killed!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[corneileous]

Indeed.

Nice, twist things around..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Bikenut]

Originally Posted by Bikenut View Post
I stand corrected. You only don't agree with the property owner's private property right to deny entry to those who carry guns.

Ya had it right, here. What happened below??

Originally posted by Bikenut:
As if the property owner's rights are unimportant. Oh wait. You have made that quite clear over and over and over ... and are still doing so.

Property owners SPECIFIC right to keep out the defensive carrier.

Again, not ALL rights.

What private property rights do you agree with?

Originally Posted by Bikenut View Post
Running out of cogent arguments?

That was a poor attempt at sarcasm because you keep on and on....

That was in no way, shape or form a compliment.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I am well aware of the tactic to attempt to denigrate, diminish, and demean the other when a person doesn't have anything cogent to support their argument.

 

[Bikenut]

NO, we're not talking about ALL RIGHTS! Just this specific one!!

I'm not just talking about me! I'm talking about everybody! Even the anti-gun people who die in these places! Everytime you spout off about the store owners rights to ban guns from his establishment, you are supporting a right that gets people killed!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Odd. Throughout this discussion you have offered your excuses to justify your... sneaking... a gun into/onto private property with a no guns rule/policy. Do you speak for everybody?

And it isn't the no guns rule/policy that gets people killed. It is people going into a business with a no guns rule/policy that puts them in danger of being killed.

And anti gunners are only talking about just one specific right too.

 

[corneileous]

What private property rights do you agree with?

Seriously?

I think I've already dropped quite a few hints stating that the right for a store owner to ban defensive carry is the only one I said I have a problem with.

am well aware of the tactic to attempt to denigrate, diminish, and demean the other when a person doesn't have anything cogent to support their argument.

Yet you keep dragging this out...

How many times we gonna beat this dead horse?

You support a right that gets people killed and I don't. What more is there to discuss rather than useless, back and forth bantering?



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Bikenut]

Seriously?

I think I've already dropped quite a few hints stating that the right for a store owner to ban defensive carry is the only one I said I have a problem with.

Please be specific as to what private property rights you agree with.

Originally posted by Bikenut:
I am well aware the tactic is to attempt to denigrate, diminish, and demean the other when a person doesn't have anything cogent to support their argument.

Yet you keep dragging this out...

How many times we gonna beat this dead horse?

You support a right that gets people killed and I don't. What more is there to discuss rather than useless, back and forth bantering?



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I do not support a right that gets people killed. I support the property owner's right to make any rules/policies he sees fit. It is up to individuals to decide if they will put themselves in danger of being killed by entering dangerous property.

You are aware that I am only half of this conversation and your questions apply equally to you?

 

[corneileous]

Odd. Throughout this discussion you have offered your excuses to justify your... sneaking... a gun into/onto private property with a no guns rule/policy. Do you speak for everybody?

Oh my god, are you for real??

Of course I've offered my "excuses" to justify ...................sneaking................
my gun in. But I am not speaking for everyone. I'm just stating a fact that people get killed in SUPPOSED to be GUN FREE STORES.

And it isn't the no guns rule/policy that gets people killed. It is people going into a business with a no guns rule/policy that puts them in danger of being killed.

It's not?? So now you're expecting a BAD GUY to follow a sign? That's hilarious.

And anti gunners are only talking about just one specific right too.

This discussion is not about the liberals and their anti-gun agenda,no matter how much you keep making it sound to be.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[corneileous]

Please be specific as to what private property rights you agree with.

Why do you want to know this information so bad?

And again, how much more proof do you need when I say that one specific one is the only one I don't agree with? Do I need to break out the overhead projector and the slide rule to explain it?

I do not support a right that gets people killed. I support the property owner's right to make any rules/policies he sees fit. It is up to individuals to decide if they will put themselves in danger of being killed by entering dangerous property.

That's not what I see but, whatever. You're going to continue to argue so what's the point?

You are aware that I am only half of this conversation and your questions apply equally to you?

Hey, I tried to end this discussion earlier but you prevented that. You just keep rambling on. Maybe the mods will put this topic out of its misery.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Bikenut]

Originally Posted by Bikenut View Post
Odd. Throughout this discussion you have offered your excuses to justify your... sneaking... a gun into/onto private property with a no guns rule/policy. Do you speak for everybody?

Oh my god, are you for real??

Of course I've offered my "excuses" to justify ...................sneaking................
my gun in. But I am not speaking for everyone. I'm just stating a fact that people get killed in SUPPOSED to be GUN FREE STORES.

I'm not just talking about me! I'm talking about everybody! Even the anti-gun people who die in these places! Everytime you spout off about the store owners rights to ban guns from his establishment, you are supporting a right that gets people killed!

Interesting.

 

[corneileous]

I'm not just talking about me! I'm talking about everybody! Even the anti-gun people who die in these places! Everytime you spout off about the store owners rights to ban guns from his establishment, you are supporting a right that gets people killed!

[/QUOTE]

I think you missed something.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[corneileous]

Why don't you just give it a rest?



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[corneileous]

Interesting.

Missed the point entirely.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Bikenut]

Originally posted by Bikenut:
And it isn't the no guns rule/policy that gets people killed. It is people going into a business with a no guns rule/policy that puts them in danger of being killed.

It's not?? So now you're expecting a BAD GUY to follow a sign? That's hilarious.

No. I am explaining that it is up to the individual to decide if going into a business with a no guns rule/policy is worth the risk of getting killed by a bad guy. And I am pointing out that if the individual's real concern is to protect themselves not going in at all would be the most effective way of protecting themselves.

Originally posted by Bikenut:
And anti gunners are only talking about just one specific right too.

This discussion is not about the liberals and their anti-gun agenda,no matter how much you keep making it sound to be.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This discussion is about disrespecting the property owner's private property rights when folks... sneak... their gun into/onto property where there is a no guns rule/policy. This discussion is about property rights. All the talk about people getting killed is an excuse to justify disrespecting the property owner's right to deny entry to those who carry guns by .. sneaking... the gun in anyway.

And I am pointing out the commonality of attitude between those who disrespect property rights and those who disrespect the right to keep and bear arms.

 

[Bikenut]

Originally Posted by Bikenut View Post
I'm not just talking about me! I'm talking about everybody! Even the anti-gun people who die in these places! Everytime you spout off about the store owners rights to ban guns from his establishment, you are supporting a right that gets people killed!

I think you missed something.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Then kindly explain.