Originally Posted by Bikenut View Post
One other positive is that it pisses off the anti gunners by showing them right there "in their faces" that they are not important enough to be in control of how the right to bear arms is exercised.
That's the problem right there if you're walking around like that looking to piss people off (which is exactly what the antis say you guys are doing) then you will get a reaction and it just might be the reaction they got in California or the reaction they Got in Colorado when some Yo Yo started showing up at city council meeting with a shotgun, third time he did it the city banned open carry in city owned buildings.
Interesting how you managed to assume the folks walking around with long guns were doing it just to piss people off. I said I liked it because it pisses of anti gunners... and it would piss off anti gunners regardless of the reason it was done. But because it pisses you off you also assume anyone actually gives a crap if anti gunners get pissed off. Actually if the anti gunners are getting pissed off then the pro gunners are doing something right.
I don't necessarily agree with your other points but this one is going to cause some trouble sooner or later
Originally Posted by Bikenut View Post
One other positive is that it pisses off the anti gunners by showing them right there "in their faces" that they are not important enough to be in control of how the right to bear arms is exercised. Actually I kinda like this one since I find it humorous to watch an anti gunner get all red in the face and self importantly puff all up (or try to ridicule/insult on the internet) when faced with the undeniable proof... right there "in their faces".... they just are not as important as they think they are... and there are people who know just how unimportant that anti gunner really is. Kinda hurts their ego.