dad45acp
New member
Yes East Coast, very large city SO PLEASE give it a rest.
And I'm Kermit the Frog.
Sent from my hand-held mind distractor
Yes East Coast, very large city SO PLEASE give it a rest.
How is that even remotely the same thing? They shot an unarmed man, and struck two innocent people. The cops in the OP shot a man who was actively shooting back, and only hit their intended target? Nobody here once said that police are right all the time. We were defending the cops in the OPs specific incident.
I will tell you why because police shooting at their target and hitting or missing it the bullets still travel meaning bystanders can be hit by them. You all were in a tizzy about the 107 year old mans bullets hitting bystanders but don't give a damn about the police and swat team bullets hitting a bystander. I will say if I had to get hit by a bullet I would want it to be the 107 year old man so that I could sue cause we all know the police and swat can shoot and kill people with immunity.
The government, it's alphabet agencies, and law enforcement are all out of control. Big picture my friends, look at the big picture.
And I'm Kermit the Frog.
Sent from my hand-held mind distractor
So with this said can we now give it a rest and thank God the good guys were not harmed and let the "DEAD" rest .
I will tell you why because police shooting at their target and hitting or missing it the bullets still travel meaning bystanders can be hit by them. You all were in a tizzy about the 107 year old mans bullets hitting bystanders but don't give a damn about the police and swat team bullets hitting a bystander. I will say if I had to get hit by a bullet I would want it to be the 107 year old man so that I could sue cause we all know the police and swat can shoot and kill people with immunity.
Yup until he started shooting THROUGH the front door...which undoubtedly concluded negotiations. Age becomes irrelevant at that point.
Sent from my hand-held mind distractor