Now wait just a minute. Shouldn't you as a matter of principle shake the dust off your boots and go find a church that allows open carry ?
You funny guy, you! No, I would rather worship with the Christians who are under the same government imposed regulations that I am who are equally as disappointed with their lack of ability to carry firearms where they worship as I am. It's called worshipping with people of like minds.
He made it quite clear this is on a military installation where our personnel are denied their rights since it is Federal property.
What does that mean in relation to what wolf_fire said? (I don't know what it means at all, so I guess just start there and I'll see if I can suss out for myself how it relates to what you were replying to.)
Blues
mox nix..originated with American soldiers stationed in Germany after World War II. An American spelling of the German expression "macht nichts" which means roughly, "it makes no difference."
Cypher said.."Shouldn't you as a matter of principle shake the dust off your boots and go find a church that allows open carry"?
wolf_fire said.."He made it quite clear this is on a military installation where our personnel are denied their rights since it is Federal property"
I said..."mox nix"
Last I heard, NavyLCDR was deployed on a ship, aircraft carrier if I recall correctly. Not sure if he's back on land now, but if he isn't, it would umm....mox a diff.
That would make it very difficult to find an alternative place of worship, would it not?
I am currently stationed on board USS Nimitz. I can neither confirm nor deny if and/or where we are currently deployed
Anyone so "fanatically opposed" to a church that does not allow open carry should shake the dust off his boots and go find a church that does allow open carry. Military installation or not, IMO it's
mox nix. 
leasantry:
The chapel does not oppose open carry. The chapel does oppose violating Federal regulations.
For some unfathomable reason, you're being as ridiculous as Treo. "

leasantry:" back atcha, Brother.
Blues
Apparently you should swim ashore and shake the seaweed off your boots before finding an acceptable church to attend. Link Removed
So your suggestion for anyone deployed on a naval ship is to then jump off that ship and swim through shark infested waters to the nearest land that has a church that does allow someone to carry openly rather than worship with his shipmates?
Stupid response to someone deployed on a naval ship to brush the dust off their boots and worship elsewhere since they don't allow carrying. So I ask again, is he supposed to jump off that ship and swim to the nearest land where he can open carry? You can ignore it or call it stupid all you want, but you put yourself in this particular corner.
How stupid that you can't figure it out for yourself. You've gone so far with this discussion that you've lost all common sense. Answer to your stupid question...Don't attend service aboard ship. Find a suitable church after debarking ship in port.
Unless I accidentally missed one or two references, the above is the entire thread of the "shake the dust off your boots" meme. The dishonest "Cypher" started it, and Navy went beyond any obligation he had by actually answering his smart-a$$ remark, which was based solely on a dishonest meme that "Cypher" (and maybe others)
made up concerning what's been said by OC'ers and OC supporters about OC'ing in church.
In case you're unaware, an American aircraft carrier is a "military installation." Navy confirmed that he is stationed on the Nimitz. Wolf responded to your "mox nix" thing because, like I also responded, being on an aircraft carrier might well "mox a diff" for Navy being able to "shake the dust" blah blah blah.
And I say again, for some inexplicable reason, you're being as ridiculous as "Cypher" is by calling wolf's replies to your obvious misreading of the thread "stupid." Now you're saying that Navy should not worship
at all in a Ship's Chapel, or that
he shouldn't choose whichever church he wishes to visit for
whatever reasons he wishes to visit it, all because of something that neither he or anyone else but the dishonest "Cypher"
made up that they said.
No one in any of these threads EVER said that OC was "THE MOST IMPORTANT THING, period. All anyone has done is question the
security aspect that "Cypher" claims is the basis for his church's no-OC policy. No one has said that his church doesn't have every right in the world to institute such a policy, they/we have simply pointed out the blatant
fallacy that it provides one iota of "security" at all if hundreds of people per service, some of whom will be newcomers at
every such service, are carrying concealed.
That is the only "stupidity" in these threads, to think that such a ridiculous "security" policy has any validity to it when it creates so many blatant and obvious security
breaches.
I'll admit I don't know my Bible well enough to argue with either you or Treo about it, Ringo, but I know a damned lot about security, tactics, disaster plans, triage and escape and evacuation, and I'm telling you unequivocally that the only "security" that "Cypher's" church's policy provides is for the
shooter(s) when some whack-job(s) on a suicide mission that his church invites in and welcomes as one of their own show up with no scrutiny whatsoever.
Good grief, this has gotten ridiculous. The only people who have been honest throughout these three threads are the ones who have accurately and honestly evaluated the policy I just commented on. Otherwise, the dishonest people who make up arguments of others out of whole clothe are supported by comments and "likes" from people I never would have predicted couldn't recognize dishonesty when it was right in front of them. Strange days people, strange days indeed.
Blues