So, were you to blame? Did you turn your back when your family needed help? How did you feel after? Did you do all you could do? I don't think you did isn't that right Mr. Bluestringer.Proof positive of your small-mindedness, turning to a family tragedy that I've spoken freely about so you can get a dig in on an internet stranger.
So, were you to blame? Did you turn your back when your family needed help? How did you feel after? Did you do all you could do? I don't think you did isn't that right Mr. Bluestringer.
I've cross-examined thousands of people. I argued for a living and I'm good at it. I have hundreds of questions for you. You can stop this anytime by leaving me alone. And because you started this you may not have the last word. You wanted my attention? Now you have it undivided. It continues until you stop insulting.
Leave me alone.
You brought it on. Actions have consequences. Even dogs learn this. Don't try to explain it away. I printed all the posts in chrono order. You absolutely drew first blood. And more uneducated, anal retentive, long-winded posts? I have no time to read them. But my son does. He's not happy. He'd love to help his dad.Proof positive of your small-mindedness, turning to a family tragedy that I've spoken freely about so you can get a dig in on an internet stranger.
Does it seem as though you're getting whatever outcome you fantasize you can troll me into with this line of invective?
I didn't "start" anything. I called it a ridiculous assertion that you are qualified to diagnose as mentally ill anyone posting on this board, and likewise characterized your assertion that people expressing themselves on a gun forum has anything in the world to do with anyone, left or so-called "right," screaming for gun control, and that's exactly what those assertions are, ridiculous. Gun-grabbers will be "SCREAMING" for gun control no matter what any gun owners do or say, or whether what they say seems bizarre or "crazy as a junkyard dog" to you.
After that I tried to make a joke out of our differences of opinion, but that wasn't enough for you and you subsequently asked for my agreement on that which I already stated were my disagreements with you.
Like all control freaks, your use of the pseudoscience of psychiatry in your rantings shows a gross lack of ability to just have a give-and-take discussion about important topics. The 1st Amendment is an important topic, but your response to my broaching the subject was a dismissive "blah blah blah." Disarming American citizens over the most trivial and arbitrary of "laws" that give government powers that the Constitution never contemplated them having is an important topic, but your responses to me responding to your support for said "laws" is various dismissals of our constitutional rights, ranging from "You don't know what you're talking about" to "Mr. Constitution" just a post or two back in this thread.
Now you're pissed because all I did in this thread is repeat what you said about how you'd lie to cops after downing someone else's private property and deny them the ability to recover it. Of course you'd lie to the cops in that instance, because you would be breaking the law by destroying or otherwise preventing the owner from getting his drone back!
No, I can't let lies stand. It's not in my makeup. And as to the last sentence in my last paragraph, you should leave yourself alone, because if only pointing out the idiocy of committing the illegal acts you referred to while likely being video recorded is enough to set you off on these continual rants about my dead sister and my or my other family members' culpability in her death is nothing if not proof positive of your small-mindedness, turning to a family tragedy that I've spoken freely about so you can get a dig in on an internet stranger.
Blues
Carpking, race horses often have "blinders" on to limit their full view; I respectfully suggest you are emulating a race horse.
Open your bag of laws to NOT drone related, but simply PRIVATE PROPERTY related: you should quickly find laws in all 50 states related to destroying someone elses private property.
I am not a lawyer, I am not being paid lawyer rates to show you this, so I will not do ALL your work for you.
Again, please stop giving such incorrect info.
Sorry son. Cite a law or end it. Now go get a law degree if you want to be a wiseguy.
I see no one is still defending you. They loathe you and your insults. You'll stop or Internet chat just won't be fun for you anymore.
I see no one is still defending you. They loathe you and your insults.
You're new here and have much to learn about our forum and it's members. The fun is just beginning.I see no one is still defending you. They loathe you and your insults. You'll stop or Internet chat just won't be fun for you anymore. :haha:
OK, whatever you say. Worry about yourself.Oh there are people here who agree with blues. He needs no defending from us, he's doing a fine job all ready.
I know you'll probably come at me again with your homophobic attacks...that's all right I've spent a good time helping those that project their inadequacies on others. Before you keep trying to play doctor, how about you get a medical degree before being a wiseguy?
Sent from my D6616 using USA Carry mobile app
So where was dad? Did he abuse her? Did you? Did the insanity run in the family? Other than you and her is anyone else nuts? Even an uncle? Did being raised by women turn you into this abusive mama's boy? Sharp tongue from behind a keyboard? Did the abusive nature come from the male gene? What makes Bluestringer tick. We want to know what makes us the target of your abuse. All your victims are entitled to an answer.Thanks to Chen and Farmhood.
Just an update on the harassment-watch. Made my last reply with links to every forum I am a member of under the name "BluesStringer" at 11:37 (CST) this morning. A quick perusal of those sites shows no harassment of my user-name as of 5:01 PM (CST) that I could find.
The Little Rascals are going to have to step up their game if they want to drive me off the interwebs.
LO-freakin'-L!
Thanks to Chen and Farmhood.
Just an update on the harassment-watch. Made my last reply with links to every forum I am a member of under the name "BluesStringer" at 11:37 (CST) this morning. A quick perusal of those sites shows no harassment of my user-name as of 5:01 PM (CST) that I could find.
The Little Rascals are going to have to step up their game if they want to drive me off the interwebs.
LO-freakin'-L!
You have too much time on your hands sh!t-kicker. Gun nut much? Living your entire life around guns?Link Removed
Link Removed
Forums
Link Removed
CZ Forum - Ceska Zbrojovka
http://smith-wessonforum.com/forum.php
http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/forum.php
http://www.xdtalk.com/
http://www.defensivecarry.com/forum/index.php
Link Removed
https://www.gunandgame.com/forums/
http://www.taurusarmed.net/forums/forum.php
Link Removed
http://www.survivalistboards.com/
http://sigforum.com/eve
http://edcforums.com/
http://www.ar15.com/
You suggest "cite law:" Here are some I have seen elsewhere that may help you understand there ARE laws directly against this:
1) The FAA prohibits shooting down any aircraft. Ever.
Not to mention local laws regarding the discharging of firearms in certain places.
The FAA also considers UAVs aircraft.
Do the math.
2) I'm pretty certain discharging your firearm into the air is against the law in all 50 states. The act of firing up into the air is practically the poster child for these laws. You have no idea where the round will fall, and who it may hit. The FAA said a drone "hit by gunfire could crash, causing damage to persons or property on the ground, or it could collide with other objects in the air. Shooting at an unmanned aircraft could result in criminal or civil liability, just as would firing at a manned airplane."
3) it is 18 U.S. Code § 32 - 'Destruction of aircraft or aircraft facilities'. The NTSB and the FAA consider personal drones are aircraft. (Huerta v Pirker, NTSB Docket CP-217). It is not the FAA who would press charges, it's the US Attorney.
4) (a)Whoever willfully—
(1) sets fire to, damages, destroys, disables, or wrecks any aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States or any civil aircraft used, operated, or employed in interstate, overseas, or foreign air commerce;
(2) places or causes to be placed a destructive device or substance in, upon, or in proximity to, or otherwise makes or causes to be made unworkable or unusable or hazardous to work or use, any such aircraft, or any part or other materials used or intended to be used in connection with the operation of such aircraft, if such placing or causing to be placed or such making or causing to be made is likely to endanger the safety of any such aircraft;
(3) sets fire to, damages, destroys, or disables any air navigation facility, or interferes by force or violence with the operation of such facility, if such fire, damaging, destroying, disabling, or interfering is likely to endanger the safety of any such aircraft in flight;
(4) with the intent to damage, destroy, or disable any such aircraft, sets fire to, damages, destroys, or disables or places a destructive device or substance in, upon, or in proximity to, any appliance or structure, ramp, landing area, property, machine, or apparatus, or any facility or other material used, or intended to be used, in connection with the operation, maintenance, loading, unloading or storage of any such aircraft or any cargo carried or intended to be carried on any such aircraft;
(5) interferes with or disables, with intent to endanger the safety of any person or with a reckless disregard for the safety of human life, anyone engaged in the authorized operation of such aircraft or any air navigation facility aiding in the navigation of any such aircraft;
(6) performs an act of violence against or incapacitates any individual on any such aircraft, if such act of violence or incapacitation is likely to endanger the safety of such aircraft;
(7) communicates information, knowing the information to be false and under circumstances in which such information may reasonably be believed, thereby endangering the safety of any such aircraft in flight; or
(8) attempts or conspires to do anything prohibited under paragraphs (1) through (7) of this subsection;
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years or both.
5) It is also worth considering that the "internet lawyer" is probably a greasy adolescent on his way from a porn site to a gaming site.
6) The idiot tee shirt thrower (53 year old Electrical Engineer) [who downed a drone] was arrested by the police and charged with a felony, and has bail set at $10,000!
This post began with an example of someone being criminally charged after downing a drone. Item 6) above is another example of criminal charges being filed for downing a drone - no firearm involved. It is becoming almost a weekly occurance that someone gets arrested and criminally charged for downing a drone. You suggest none of these are happening? You are advising folks on here it is OK to down a drone in the face of all these criminal charges happening? Why is that folks who down drones all over are being arrested on criminal charges then?
As a last thought for you, I suggest you and your children use your googing skills for a better reason than you have already suggested: Research WHAT exact laws are being used to criminally charge these people with downing drones. Then come back here and report to the forum WHAT exactly they may expect to be criminally charged with, for downing that drone that is legally flying over their property in FAA governed space that they do not own. I suggest that would be a much better and more BENEFICIAL use of your lawyer abilites that would be a very positive use of your time.
I think I know some people who'll be interested in looking at these.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?