Because we are not considered Law Enforcement in all states.
In the State of Indiana we are considered Public Safety Officers under the Indiana Constitution and our service academy does not give us arrest powers.
We are Public Servants doing a dangerous job, going in with the felons convicted of murder, rape, molestation, burglary, etc, etc, etc. We run the risk at work of being assaulted daily, and I for one have been. I know officers that have not only been assaulted, but came out needing many reconstructive surgeries, and one that lost an eye. I count myself lucky that I was able to defend myself as well as I did and only had one assailant, but even so I still suffer migraines from the pounding I took. But you are correct, we get none of the benefits of the LEOs.
Now, in some states, the Correctional Officers are LEOs. For those that go through ILEA, they would get the LEO benefits and can carry in all 50 US States. But for those of us like you and I, we are just Public Safety Officers, like Firemen, which the public puts in the back of their minds and gives no consideration to, not even the consideration they give to the Fire Department.
I would surmise as a correction officer, you do not carry a firearm and I also surmise, other than in states where some go through ILEA, you are not trained to the extent that an LEO is trained so carrying outside of your job other than a permit like everyone else makes sense. You have a dangerous job that, as you say, can cause you intimate personal harm but you chose the job and in the environment of a prison, common sense just screams that you should not be carrying a firearm. You do not feel you get the respect of a firearm and even that is understandable from the standpoint of the public who, in general, have no idea what you do as opposed to a fireman, who the public can see everyday doing their job. I do not think anything is going to change with regards to your comments other than becoming an LEO or finding another job. From your comments I surely understand the angst in your words--just stating what I consider obvious interpretations of the dilemma you face.
We as officers have our family to protect, off duty, what about our lives ?
- Snippage-
You do not feel you get the respect of a firearm and even that is understandable from the standpoint of the public who, in general, have no idea what you do as opposed to a fireman, who the public can see everyday doing their job. I do not think anything is going to change with regards to your comments other than becoming an LEO or finding another job. From your comments I surely understand the angst in your words--just stating what I consider obvious interpretations of the dilemma you face.
What about the rest of citizenry? Pfft.
I agree that ALL Citizenry needs to be able to protect themselves Wolf_Fire. But I believe that fbates was getting at that correctional officers can be specifically targeted solely because of their jobs for a form of retribution and he therefore thought we should have the same rights as LEOs. As I was pointing out in my post, depending on our states, we aren't Law Enforcement, but rather Public Safety. Therefore we do not get LEO consideration, and do and should rely on permits the same as the rest of the Citizenry.
OK, however, where do we draw the line? I worked in law enforcement, not as an LEO, but did take many to court, and some went to jail. I did not, and wasn't allowed to carry a weapon on the job, even though I did receive threats from more than one person I had to deal with. I too face the possibility of meeting on of the people that may want to retaliate against me. Shouldn't I be able to protect my family and myself?
Should a juror in a murder trial also be able to carry a gun? There are all kinds of angry people after a guilty verdict. Where do you draw the line?
We as officers have our family to protect, off duty, what about our lives ?
I agree that ALL Citizenry needs to be able to protect themselves Wolf_Fire. But I believe that fbates was getting at that correctional officers can be specifically targeted solely because of their jobs for a form of retribution and he therefore thought we should have the same rights as LEOs. As I was pointing out in my post, depending on our states, we aren't Law Enforcement, but rather Public Safety. Therefore we do not get LEO consideration, and do and should rely on permits the same as the rest of the Citizenry.
We as officers have our family to protect, off duty, what about our lives ?
I, as a human, have my life and family to protect. There is nothing special about yours.
I so hate the troll posts whenever there is a new giveaway contest.
I for one don't pay attention to the give aways because I think any chance I have at winning is trivial in the first place.
Personally, I gave up expecting any 'Special' rights a long time ago. But I would like the public to realize a bit more about what correctional staff face before they just dismiss them as 'Rent-a-cops' or 'Cop Wanna-be's.'
Work is the one place I can't carry. Can't even consider carrying, and can't even leave my weapon in the car despite the 'Safe Harbor' law enacted here in Indiana because Penal Facilities are specifically excluded from the 'Safe Harbor.'
Wahhh... I can't keep my firearm in the car either in my state because apparently schools are considered "safe havens" in which shootings never happen. How many inmates have been shot in jail since 1980?... there have been close to 300 shooting deaths in our schools.
I'm not trying to dismiss how difficult your job is... but everyone has situations in which they need to protect themselves and every time our government officials disarm us there is more of our freedom being flushed down the toilet.