Rhino
New member
That part bothers me too. Obviously she knew something was very wrong or she wouldn't have been taking action to commit him. We don't know the details of how he managed to get the guns in the first place. Maybe she did secure them and he managed to get them anyway. Even the best gun safe can be broken into by a determined thief. Circumstances do tend to suggest though, that no matter how he got them, it probably wasn't all that difficult. My guess is that she simply underestimated the danger, but that's just a guess. It wouldn't really be fair to pass judgement without all the facts.What bothers me are parents who know their kid is a nutjob. He's a weird kid who is antisocial, violent tempered, dark, depressed, etc... always has been. And they don't lockup their own guns. Now it's a completely different story of he's a normal kid. But when he's a psychotic, sociopathic little troll you lock them up. This kid in Newtown was half-a-click from being committed by his mother. Yet he had access to the guns. THAT is a problem. Perhaps this should be laid at the feet of the parent. So how does the Senate legislate parenting smarts?