Grognard Gunny:242128 said:
Why do we always end up in the same place with these discussions? It's maddening.
Most of us are reasonable humans. Forget you are a responsible CCer or OCer for a minute. Pretend you're some thug. Are you really going to go pick a fight with someone because he's wearing a pistol? Really? Even being around guns my whole life, seeing one out in public, on a cop or even a mere mortal, always sends the tiniest "danger" message to my brain.
The only people I can see being provoked into attacking an OCer are gangstas looking for trouble anyway, or black-clad ninjitsu-like international jewel thieves who have been planning a million-dollar heist using high-dollar tactical equipment they have been training with for the past eighteen months and who are not going to let Joe Opencarry ruin their perfect getaway.
And don't even throw around the "element of surprise" discussion. The only person who is ever surprised in these situations is YOU. SURPRISE you've got to shoot some dirtbag today, and dammit, you had other, more important things on your agenda. And you know what? You're going to get the job done if you're open carrying, concealed carrying, or carrying a friggin sack of potatoes.
.... and it takes "localgirl" to boil down all the crap to a logical, well considered statement of probable outcomes. WELL done!
GG
Im pretty sure Navy, Al, and I have said that repeatedly. The problem is the main proponent to us three is in the type of black clad ninjitsu gang that wants to attack open carriers and from his first hand experience (aka his uncommon sense) will keep telling people it causes more problems (upsets the public, upsets LEO's, targeted first, targeted because of the gun, deterrence value, element of suprise) which are not true. It wasn't too long ago when I trolled with an "element of surprise" post and Localgirl posted a SUPRISE message that SUPRISED a lot of people (not sure if everyone will understand my reference...but they can go find it if they want). I am not sure when she decided to change her mind, but I think she changed it for the better. We are the only ones that will be surprised in an attack, but we will do everything we can to stop it, even if we are naked holding a sack of potatoes. I said this earlier, the only surprise the attacker is going to get is that he didn't pick a victim, and you do not have to be armed to do that.
From what I see, most proponents to gun rights don't hate guns solely because "they are evil," but because they are completely ill informed of what, how, when, and why firearms are used. For instance, I have a coworker that just bought an XD9. I asked him, "why did you choose the 9mm?" Not to spark a debate between calibers, because there are great reasons to get a 9mm. His first response, "Because it shoots farther." He didn't come up with this conclusion on his own, it was another gun owner that told him that. What Navy, Al, and I are trying to accomplish is stopping/correcting the ill information that is being passed around. How will it ever stop if there aren't people like us? I know you have stated you have banged your head against that wall long enough, and I am glad you were banging that stupid wall before. Now its my turn to bang my head against that stupid wall and hope that maybe you cracked it and I can tear it down. Or maybe I will crack it, and someone after will tear it down. But we cant stop, we have to be like a river, and be persistant, because there is a big friggen dam in our way now (thanks Gov! SARCASM) and we are slowly tearing it down.