XD40scinNC
New member
No, my question was how do you justify the murder of untold numbers of babies and small children by drowning?First of all, I find it interesting that someone who doesn't believe in the Bible believes that God sent a worldwide flood to the earth. It seems that anything in the Bible that you construe as "negative" you believe, and anything that is "positive" you don't believe. Either the whole Bible is true or it isn't. You can't pick and choose.
Anyway, to your question.
Noah preached 120 years to the people, warning them that needed to repent, and that God was sending destruction if they didn't. It was the people who rejected the word of God, just as they do now. It was the people themselves who refused to repent and brought about their destruction. They were responsible for themselves and their children. They would have continued their evil ways and would have gotten worse and worse. So, yes, it was a defensive action in order to preserve the continuation of mankind thru the remnant of Noah's family. It was not murder.
First it is ludicrous to think that I give that completely absurd fiction any credence, but however you apparently take it at face value, which really causes me to question your ability to reason.
Next that insinuates that Noah was able to talk to (preach at) every single person on the planet, on six continents during his preacher years. Keep in mind this was before TV and radio, how did he do that?
I noticed that you didn't explain all the babies and small children that died a horrible death during this fictitious event. Or to even think that the entire population (every single person except the incestuous Noah family) of the world were sinners, millions of people?
So willfully drowning untold numbers of babies and small children, the elderly, the infirmed, the mentally deficient, etc., is not murder, then what the &%$# would you call it? Collateral damage?