Interesting...

[NavyLCDR]

My point was that merely carrying is not technically "threatening", and as such this sign could be challenged if someone had the time and inclination. The idiots could have just posted the sign with no legal citation and it would have been more "legal". Now it just looks legal.

True, but we can't really tell exactly what statutes/ordinances they have on the sign from the photo.

 

[telpinaro]

True, but we can't really tell exactly what statutes/ordinances they have on the sign from the photo.

And who knows what they'd put on there... Bloomberg says that whole county doesn't even have roads. Must be too stupid to know which ordinance to put! :sarcastic:

 

[whodat2710]

True, but we can't really tell exactly what statutes/ordinances they have on the sign from the photo.

Oh, I thought you had figured that out when you posted the regulation in an earlier post.

 

[NavyLCDR]

Oh, I thought you had figured that out when you posted the regulation in an earlier post.

That was just a guess on my part.