Dems introducing another magazine ban TODAY...

[NavyLCDR]

Very good point why should the government have all the good stuff?

This is my opinion. When the founding fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment, they meant for the citizens to have the exact same weapons the government was able to have. Which, at that time, was not much more than muskets, flintlock pistols and canons. Whether or not the founding fathers envisioned weapons of mass destruction or not, it doesn't really matter. As technology progressed, the government acquired weapons of mass destruction all the way up to nuclear ICBMs (and who knows what else secret weapons the government has). As it stands now, does that mean that the 2nd Amendment says the citizen should be able to possess nuclear ICBMs? I believe that it does.

Here's what went wrong. If We The People decided that we did not want Joe Citizen to possess nuclear ICBMs then the correct course of action would have been to amend the 2nd Amendment to limit it to small arms. But that never happened. Instead of We The People deciding that we did not want Joe Citizen to possess nuclear ICBMs what actually happened was the government decided they did not want Joe Citizen to possess nuclear ICBMs and violated the 2nd Amendment by infringing upon the right of Joe Citizen to possess nuclear ICBMs.

The purpose of the 2nd Amendment was to ensure that Joe Citizen would always retain the ability to abolish the Federal government by force, if necessary. The Federal government has already infringed upon Joe Citizen's rights which were supposed to be protected by the 2nd Amendment to such an extent that the real purpose of the 2nd Amendment can no longer be accomplished.

 

[SR9]

Oh come on people, everybody knows Valerie Jarrett is really running the country.........

 

[S&W645]

Oh come on people, everybody knows Valerie Jarrett is really running the country.........

Sorry, you are wrong. George is still running the county, by way of the teleprompter. 0bama keeps telling everyone everything is Bush's fault. Don't you believe him? /sarc

 

[arikk]

My dad said he gets the right to finish being president before he can be impeached. And think what would happened if he was. I think it could cause a war. And we all know there more immigrants than actual
US citizens( exageratting )now there's a (unconfirmed) amnesty. But why doesn't the government doesn't want to renew the homeland security fund. It would be US citizens against the world Becaz it is a swarm of immigrants fleeing in.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using USA Carry mobile app

 

[BC1]

My dad said he gets the right to finish being president before he can be impeached. And think what would happened if he was. I think it could cause a war. And we all know there more immigrants than actual
US citizens( exageratting )now there's a (unconfirmed) amnesty. But why doesn't the government doesn't want to renew the homeland security fund. It would be US citizens against the world Becaz it is a swarm of immigrants fleeing in.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using USA Carry mobile app

He can be impeached while in office. Reference Bill Clinton. I'm no Clinton fan but that impeachment was nothing short of a stupid three-ring circus. Impeaching a president for lying about an extramarital affair was ridiculous. The entire world laughed at us. Especially since numerous presidents had affairs.
.
It's a pretty slippery slope. Impeachment takes time. Folks may remember when Clinton was impeached the entire country took it's eye off the ball to focus on impeachment. Meanwhile he enemy was training in flight simulators. Obama is basically daring anyone to impeach. He is lawless. Many of his executive orders were intended to stop Congressional investigations that might eventually lead back to Pennsylvania Ave. Others, such as deferring the ACA employer mandate and the immigration order, exceed his constitutional authority.
.
By your post it appears you're a young man. You have inherited a world that's been screwed-up by my generation. Many young people support Obama because they haven't yet fully understood why our founding fathers created a republic with three independent branches of government. It was to prevent a president from making or changing a law without the Congressional approval. And this is exactly what has happened. Yes, it's impeachable. But can America afford to detract from the abundance of problems just to get him out?

 

[CharlesMorrison]

My dad said he gets the right to finish being president before he can be impeached. And think what would happened if he was. I think it could cause a war. And we all know there more immigrants than actual
US citizens( exageratting )now there's a (unconfirmed) amnesty. But why doesn't the government doesn't want to renew the homeland security fund. It would be US citizens against the world Becaz it is a swarm of immigrants fleeing in.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using USA Carry mobile app

Link Removed

 

[arikk]

OH I was thinking that it was when he was out of office. Anyway I guess an Affair is more important than holding him more accountable for not abiding by our # 1 Laws. That being The Consituation. I think with Obama they should wait til he is finishes then strip him of the things he imposed that was unconstitutional.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using USA Carry mobile app

 

[longslide10]

To error is human to be a democrat is stupid


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Or Communist.

 

[longslide10]

The only down side I can see to impeachment is that Joe Biden would become President (I think).

Hmmm, let me see here---a drunken boob or a gay fascist mooslum? I'll take the drunken boob.

 

[longslide10]

Where does the word "small" appear in the 2nd Amendment?

No where but do you think the avg Joe could/should own and operate complex and very expensive arms like Abrams tanks, anti-aircraft missiles, tank busters, fighter aircraft, guided missiles etc? Small arms is anything from 22 single shot to 50 cal machine guns and everything in between. I am saying if military has M2's, SAW's and grenade launchers then so should we be able to.

 

[longslide10]

He can be impeached while in office. Reference Bill Clinton. I'm no Clinton fan but that impeachment was nothing short of a stupid three-ring circus. Impeaching a president for lying about an extramarital affair was ridiculous. The entire world laughed at us. Especially since numerous presidents had affairs.
.
It's a pretty slippery slope. Impeachment takes time. Folks may remember when Clinton was impeached the entire country took it's eye off the ball to focus on impeachment. Meanwhile he enemy was training in flight simulators. Obama is basically daring anyone to impeach. He is lawless. Many of his executive orders were intended to stop Congressional investigations that might eventually lead back to Pennsylvania Ave. Others, such as deferring the ACA employer mandate and the immigration order, exceed his constitutional authority.
.
By your post it appears you're a young man. You have inherited a world that's been screwed-up by my generation. Many young people support Obama because they haven't yet fully understood why our founding fathers created a republic with three independent branches of government. It was to prevent a president from making or changing a law without the Congressional approval. And this is exactly what has happened. Yes, it's impeachable. But can America afford to detract from the abundance of problems just to get him out?

Let's not forget that he has created or magnified a myriad of the problems we face today. Impeachment would be too nice he needs to do hard prison time.

 

[longslide10]

Oh come on people, everybody knows Valerie Jarrett is really running the country.........

And the slew of appointed mooslums surrounding her and Obummer.