Bolo alert bloomies are infiltrating gun boards>>>

Yes, don't let anyone who disagrees with you express their reasoning because it might make your reasoning look stupid. What a great plan.
 
Yes, don't let anyone who disagrees with you express their reasoning because it might make your reasoning look stupid. What a great plan.

You are guilty of the same behavior, talk about the pot calling the kettle black.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
 
Yes, don't let anyone who disagrees with you express their reasoning because it might make your reasoning look stupid. What a great plan.

The issue is; while most of us are eloquent and well versed in presenting our argument, the Anti's shill will take that one person who isn't and label all of us as crazy. They will misinform, as is their normal tendency, to elicit their response. You can shoot them down 99 times out of 100, they will delete those 99 arguments and only publicize the one. Remember NBC?
 
forget about the gin boards, more importantly they are infiltrating local governments, here in FLA we found one in Orlando in a fictitious position and one in JAX as well, look for recently hired consulting types, safety officials and other advisors
 
Yes, don't let anyone who disagrees with you express their reasoning because it might make your reasoning look stupid. What a great plan.
Bouncing off your post with the following general comment..........

I don't mind a conversation with someone who wishes to express their reasoning as long as they are willing to provide cites and/or links to actual facts that back up their reasoning...

No cites... no links... ='s no reason to listen to BS cloaked in psuedo "reasoning".

Of course no one on this forum would evade or avoid giving cites and/or links to facts to prove the validity of their statements........................... would they?
 
Your join date is posted, watch what is being said by new members.
Should be a good starting point. Seems reasonably simple to me.
 
Bolo alert bloomies are infiltrating gun boards>>>

Well turns out I'm too lazy to read that article on that long-ass link and I have no idea what you guys are talking about. Mind explaining?
 
I have said it before and I will reiterate. Be especially aware on any WTS or WTB threads. If you get a sob story about how the buyer can't pass a background check. Hit the ignore button without delay. It is not some poor slob that is being rep raped by his wife's bloodsucking attorney, it is a Bloomber troll. Bloomberg is trying to get examples of gun owners selling guns on the net to other individuals who outright told the seller he couldn't pass a NIC check. Take it for what it is worth. But as soon as they get a bunch of examples there will be headlines and proposed legislation.
MARK MY WORD!!!!
 
I have said it before and I will reiterate. Be especially aware on any WTS or WTB threads. If you get a sob story about how the buyer can't pass a background check. Hit the ignore button without delay. It is not some poor slob that is being rep raped by his wife's bloodsucking attorney, it is a Bloomber troll. Bloomberg is trying to get examples of gun owners selling guns on the net to other individuals who outright told the seller he couldn't pass a NIC check. Take it for what it is worth. But as soon as they get a bunch of examples there will be headlines and proposed legislation.
MARK MY WORD!!!!
I know that I would only sell a weapon to either someone in my state via a FTF transaction or if I sold a gun to someone out of my state it would have to transact via an FFL on both ends. anyone who doesn't obey the law deserves to be prosecuted
 
Gun boards don't seem to me to be a good place to catch would-be criminals. Even if no one on here was a law abiding citizen, no one on here uses their real names or pictures of themselves as their avatars. "Infiltrating" an internet gun board seems to me to be an act of desperation.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 
Gun boards don't seem to me to be a good place to catch would-be criminals. Even if no one on here was a law abiding citizen, no one on here uses their real names or pictures of themselves as their avatars. "Infiltrating" an internet gun board seems to me to be an act of desperation.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
And you don't think that they are that desperate? After their loss in the Senate they are that whacked out. You saw that with el Presidente.
 
Old news, yes, but I would caution folks to be careful with any personal information that they could report. Boy, talk about shades of the Reds in the fifties and sixties!
 
keep an eye peeled for bloomies that want nothing more than to make gun owners look dumb and have a good time doing it to advance their agenda...

Their idea of stupid and the majority of those of us who support the Constitution are VERY different. The libtards base nothing in reality and they can spout all they wish. They can never alter the truth.
 

New Threads

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
49,531
Messages
610,692
Members
75,032
Latest member
BLACKROCK6
Back
Top