I am heartened by the warm welcome newcomers receive here. Especially if they disagree with you. The libs call us intolerant of others. It would appear that they peeked in this forum to get that characterization. Anyone who disagrees with the hardcore few gets soundly thrashed.
Last time I looked, forums like this were a good way to debate ideas, principles, and concepts. People could post experiences and have reasonable expectation that they wouldn't be bullied. Times have changed. Now it seems like a group of 5 or 6 people sitting in a circle pulling each others puds.
Either you want honest debate or you want to holler and thump your chests. Which is it?
Because you just have given the Feds the right to enforce something that is outside their enumerated rights in the Constitution. And once the camel has its nose under the tent flap, it soon is inside.
Sorry but your imagination is running wild with no relationship to the facts. All or nothing gets us nothing.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using USA Carry mobile app
Sorry but your imagination is running wild with no relationship to the facts. All or nothing gets us nothing.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using USA Carry mobile app
Supporting more gun control power for the government isn't a step forward for gun rights but is the exact opposite of giving more power to control guns to the government.Sorry but your imagination is running wild with no relationship to the facts. All or nothing gets us nothing.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using USA Carry mobile app
Sorry but your imagination is running wild with no relationship to the facts. All or nothing gets us nothing.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using USA Carry mobile app
I agree with you there S&W!
This part if for the sheeple who just can't get it through their thick skulls...
I just don't get it. Are you guys who want a national carry fuking dense or what?!
What part of the God damn Guberment has NO God damn authority to do shyte don't you friggin understand!?!
Read the God damn Constitution and BOR for Christ sake...
You want to hand over power to the gov to regulate something they have no authority over and you think WE don't get it?!
Move on.... You're dismissed..
Link RemovedLink RemovedLink Removed
I think I'm beginning to understand.
It's kind of like the Fed sticking their noses into the states right to enforce segregation.
If a state doesn't want Negro's to be allowed to go to the same school as Caucasian's then it should be alright.
And does that extend to Cities rights to "local rule"? Should States as well as the Fed be prohibited from preventing local laws?
BULL.... You understand nothing except how to infringe and pull stupidity out of your backside to fail at making any point other than proving you dont know anything about rights.
Sent from my SM-G900V using USA Carry mobile app
I think I'm beginning to understand.
It's kind of like the Fed sticking their noses into the states right to enforce segregation.
If a state doesn't want Negro's to be allowed to go to the same school as Caucasian's then it should be alright.
And does that extend to Cities rights to "local rule"? Should States as well as the Fed be prohibited from preventing local laws?
What government license is a black person required to obtain from the government in order to have equal treatment without segregation? That's the difference. We aren't talking about requiring states to respect the right of a person to carry a firearm. We are talking about the Federal government requiring states to recognize government issued licenses.
I think I'm beginning to understand.
It's kind of like the Fed sticking their noses into the states right to enforce segregation.
If a state doesn't want Negro's to be allowed to go to the same school as Caucasian's then it should be alright.
And does that extend to Cities rights to "local rule"? Should States as well as the Fed be prohibited from preventing local laws?
Let's see. There is all the irrational fear that this bill might lead to the Fed's getting involved in gun control. Ignoring of course the Fed's already getting involved as they will. 1934 gun control (unconstitutional). 1968 gun control (unconstitutional). Magazine bans. Gun import bans. The Fed's don't need a new excuse.
The camel's nose under the tent is a legitimate example. However the camel is already in the tent. This bill sticks his nose under the tent on the way out.
It is no surprise that y'all against the bill have jumped to personal attacks. You have nothing else.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using USA Carry mobile app
The people her who are against this bill are both violently against it and profane. Insults flow from them freely. They don't want a rational discussion of the issue....
As far as the camel in the tent, it was a female and gave birth to another camel. It is that young camel that is now trying to get its nose into a second tent. That is how gov't violates the Constitution. A good analogy would be a bull (gov't) in a china shop ( USA ) where it wrecks everything in the place sooner or later. That was the warning the founding fathers gave 200+ years ago and why they included a Second Amendment.Let's see. There is all the irrational fear that this bill might lead to the Fed's getting involved in gun control. Ignoring of course the Fed's already getting involved as they will. 34 gun control (unconstitutional). 68 gun control (unconstitutional). Magazine bans. Gun import bans. The Fed's don't need a new excuse.
The camel's nose under the tent is a legitimate example. However the camel is already in the tent. This bill sticks his nose under the tent on the way our.
It is no surprise that y'all against the bill have jumped to personal attacks. You have nothing else.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using USA Carry mobile app
Jefferson said:And what country can preserve it's liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?