I think I understand where you're coming from, so I can only hope you will forgive me for attempting to keep this conversation at an adult level and not 5th grade elementary school name-calling.
The danger in such statements as yours is that they can easily be used against the issuer (in this case, the issuer means 'you'). It simply goes like this....
"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I will prove today that my client, Mr Thuglife was deliberately shot by the accused, Mr Apvbguy. My client was indeed attempting to commit a criminal act, but when confronted by Mr Apvbguy dropped his weapon, fell to his knees in supplication, raised his hands in surrender and begged, BEGGED, for his life. Unfortunately for him, Mr Apvbguy had drawn his pistol and as you saw introduced as evidence had made repeated statements that if he drew his weapon he was going to use his weapon, no ifs ands, or butts. He was going to kill someone if he drew and that was just simply that. My client is the victim here, and Mr Apvbguy by his very words has confessed to being the aggressor."
Kind of reminds me of a certain pharmacist in Oklahoma City....