Nope on all the above.
.
I'm not a racist so I only look at the facts.
.
Fact #1: George is a convicted criminal and a known and proven liar so I do not believe anything that he says unless there is an unbiased witness to back up his statements.
George Zimmerman is not a convicted criminal, which has been pointed out to you more than once. He wouldn't have his concealed carry license if he were a convicted felon, which makes you the only proven liar here.
.
Fact #2: George did NOT have a legal reason to follow Martin....
Neighborhood watch, dummy. The second word is "watch", which means you sometimes have to change position to maintain visual contact.
.
.....and since two ( 2 ) different witnesses said that Martin stated that he was scared because he was being followed by someone he didn't know that makes what George did illegal.
There were no witnesses. Now you're making up more lies. Zimmerman and Martin were the only ones there. The only person that heard what Martin said was his girlfriend over the phone. That doesn't make her a witness, or not an eyewitness anyway. She could only testify to what she heard, and she didn't testify that Martin said he was scared, so I guess we can add that to your list of lies too.
.
As I e posted before, if you think you have the Right to follow anyone go down to your local Mall, pick out a minor ( male or female, it doesn't matter ) and start following them. When the Cops show up tell them you have the right to follow anyone you want to follow.
I've got better things to do than ridiculous stuff like that, but it isn't illegal. We already pointed out to you that the statute you referenced doesn't apply here, minor or not. Simply following someone does not constitute stalking, and their age doesn't matter.
.
As someone who has carried a badge and gun in the state of Florida, my bet will be that you will get to take a ride in the back seat of a cop car.
Your Roy Rogers toy set holds no water here. From the complete ignorance of facts and the law that you've displayed so far, I don't believe for one second that you've ever been a cop anywhere.
.
On another note:
.
One of the things that came up in court yesterday was how, with Martin straddling George in a MMA "ground and pound" with George's gun down in Martin hinney area, was Martin able to grab for it but George, who according to the defense, was such a wussy ( they compared him to Pee Wee Herman ) was he able to beat Martin to the gun, wrestle it away from him and shoot him?
.
It doesn't add up.
There was nothing to wrestle. Zimmerman never said Martin got the gun and he had to wrestle it back from him.
.
How was Martin able to see George's gun?
When someone pounds you onto you back on a sidewalk, your jacket tends to fall back and expose your hips, so a gun carried on your hip would be visible.
.
How was Martin while "ground and pound" George able to see a small black handgun at night, in the dark, while it was raining and the gun was underneath Martin?
.
Just curious?
He could probably feel it against his leg, something else you wouldn't be curious about if you had even the tiniest of knowledge about carrying a gun.
.
The State brought up this issue and the Defense didn't have an answer.
They don't have to answer hypothetical supposition. Supposition isn't evidence.
.
You don't carry a gun, do you? The more useless crap you post, the more convinced I am that you aren't a concealed carrier, and probably even not a gun owner. I believe many of the others are correct that you're only here to stir up trouble by deliberately ignoring facts not convenient to your narrative, and baiting others into an argument. In other words, you're just another idiot.