Good to know. I should have paid attention when I saw his name, I am a bit of "A Clinger", so that should have tipped me off, but I like to give people the benefit of the doubt. I just learned what forums were a couple months ago, so learning the other day about the ignore button was kinda like getting a new gun, I just couldn't wait to get to the range and try it. He just happened to run down range at the wrong time. :sarcastic:
Yes the ignore feature was created for people that did not have the strength to ignore it on their own and needed the computers to do it for them. Since I believe in the US constitution I have no need to suppress ones freedom of speech no matter how dumb I believe it to be instead I read it and take it for what it is then move to the next reply. While it does bother me to to say this NoGods point was a valid one that some have over looked. I on the other hand will concede and say to NoGods thanks for pointing out what Bloomberg was trying to show us by committing an illegal act to obtain a weapon to show us the loop hole. But being that he broke the law to prove his point means his ass needs to be locked up for breaking the law. For I would like to prove that I don't need a licenses to bear arms for my protection but doing so would mean breaking the law and my ass would be locked up for it. So what makes Bloomberg believe he is above the law when it comes to proving his point?