Some people should not be allowed to posses a firearm - George Zimmerman is proving that he is one of them.
What do you think?
It's possible these two women are gold diggers and they know when the movie and book come out, they want to get paid. He gave his gf his power when he pulled the firearm and pointed it at her. I was on his side, but in this situation, if she didn't have a firearm pointed at him, then he went to far and deserves punishment. He can forget about me sending him any money for help with his attorney fees. If I could have forseen this event, then I wouldn't have sent him any the first time. Oh well we all make mistakes!
Suppose he didn't want to spend the $29.95...
Florida Name Change Law offers Self-Prepared and Legal Technician-Prepared Name Change Forms
If Zimmerman had listened to the 911 dispatcher when they told him we don't need you to follow (martin) no one would even know who he was
Actually the point is that your homeboy Zimmie put himself exactly in a position to be cold cocked
There is Link Removed. I don't know if he gets any royalties from it though.
Have there been any credible movie offers made?
What do you mean, was he planning to change his name, or do you think he should have to?
Some people should not be allowed to posses a firearm - George Zimmerman is proving that he is one of them.
So by that broad statement you just made, you admit that if you happen to be walking behind me, whether you're on the phone with 911 or not, and I don't like it, I can "cold cock" you just because you put yourself in that position and that you should forfeit your right to self defense? If the shoe were on the other foot, how would you feel?Actually the point is that your homeboy Zimmie put himself exactly in a position to be cold cocked
Are you bi-polar? Your first sentence seems to be pro-Zimmerman and completely contradicts your second sentence, which you can't prove and neither can the GF...then your third sentence is a bunch of gibberish because you combine a pro and anti Zimmerman statements to make a completely idiotic statement which stinks of sexism (due to the fact that you just take what a woman says to be true with no supporting evidence) and it makes your post even more idiotic. I hope you're not married. I'd feel really sorry for that guy, having to ask what the hell you're talking about all the time.It's possible these two women are gold diggers and they know when the movie and book come out, they want to get paid. He gave his gf his power when he pulled the firearm and pointed it at her. I was on his side, but in this situation, if she didn't have a firearm pointed at him, then he went to far and deserves punishment.
Are you bi-polar? Your first sentence seems to be pro-Zimmerman and completely contradicts your second sentence, which you can't prove and neither can the GF...then your third sentence is a bunch of gibberish because you combine a pro and anti Zimmerman statements to make a completely idiotic statement which stinks of sexism (due to the fact that you just take what a woman says to be true with no supporting evidence) and it makes your post even more idiotic. I hope you're not married. I'd feel really sorry for that guy, having to ask what the hell you're talking about all the time.
In some crimes you will lose your guns upon arrest. These included rape, assault, domestic violence, etc. If found NG the guns are returned.One does have to violate a statute and be adjudicated guilty of that violation to warrant losing one's Second Amendment rights. One can not be denied a right just because the popular media or some members of society don't want him to have those rights.
Nothing has changed in that regard regardless of who we are talking about or why we are talking about him/her.
For what purpose? What motive, other than being nuts? Can't sue him, he's broke.We all know there are no women out there that would take advantage of his situation and make the phone call.
That's not the same thing. If you put yourself in a position because you followed me you may get "handled." That's a fact. Especially while in my own neighborhood.So by that broad statement you just made, you admit that if you happen to be walking behind me, whether you're on the phone with 911 or not, and I don't like it, I can "cold cock" you just because you put yourself in that position and that you should forfeit your right to self defense? If the shoe were on the other foot, how would you feel?
A little harsh don't you think? Have some respect.Are you bi-polar? Your first sentence seems to be pro-Zimmerman and completely contradicts your second sentence, which you can't prove and neither can the GF...then your third sentence is a bunch of gibberish because you combine a pro and anti Zimmerman statements to make a completely idiotic statement which stinks of sexism (due to the fact that you just take what a woman says to be true with no supporting evidence) and it makes your post even more idiotic. I hope you're not married. I'd feel really sorry for that guy, having to ask what the hell you're talking about all the time.
For what purpose? What motive, other than being nuts? Can't sue him, he's broke.
How is what you said any different from what I said? Is this a presidential debate?That's not the same thing. If you put yourself in a position because you followed me you may get "handled." That's a fact. Especially while in my own neighborhood.
.
Call an attorney and tell him you plan to start a neighborhood watch. Tell him you'll be following people while armed, have no formal training, no security license, no insurance and no indemnification from the HOA. You attorney will ask if you have a screw loose. There ends the lesson.
.
A little harsh don't you think? Have some respect.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?