All that for a seat belt violation? The state didn't waste any time firing this trooper and charging him. I see a large settlement in this poor mans future.
Groubert now faces charges of assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature.
Yet if it was a citizen shooting at a cop the charge would be attempted murder.
Of COURSE he was "thoughtless", he did EXACTLY what the cop TOLD hm to do. What would the cop have done to him if he hadn't gotten the license fast ENOUGH?What a horrible situation for everybody involved. The civilian, while doing absolutely nothing wrong, was thoughtless with the manner and speed that he reacted in going to get his ID.
But, in reality, it's irrational to suggest that they charge him with attempted murder because it appears that he was (recklessly) acting in what he thought was self defense.
At no point have I hinted that the police have special rights. The fact is, though, attempted murder is completely based on the intent to murder, and based on the evidence it just seems like the cop didn't go into the situation with the intent to kill the guy. It seems much more that he was grossly negligent and assumed and reacted completely incorrectly based on what he thought was some guy pulling a gun on him. I definitely agree that he face whatever charges relate to that, maybe something like attempted voluntary manslaughter (which isn't a really clear thing but they still charge people with it).Can you point to that part of the Constitution that says that cops have special rights to fire their weapons directly at a subject in a situation where an "average" citizen would likely be charged for attempted murder under the same circumstances? If the answer is "No, I can't" (which it is BTW), then Groubert should be charged with attempted murder. He's a servant of The People, not above them in any way, shape, manner or form.
"To Protect and Serve"
I had a similar experience on the NYS Thruway rest stop. He was smoking while fueling-up his car. I asked him to put it out and he told me where to go. I simply reached-over and hit the emergency power-off button. Now he can explain to someone else.I did had have an altercation at a local gas store with punks at a c/gas store. The boy was smoking at the pumps. His boys were leaning on his car with their cars parked close. I said "that if he wanted to blow himself up that was ok, but please put out the cigarette there are others that probably want to live". The point is he jumped into his vehicle, his back to me, and either put out the cig, or grabbed a weapon and slipped it into his waistband. As he removed himself from the drivers side window he nodded to his buddy across the passenger side and kept his back to me.
I step into my truck and figured since I started this interaction with a comment, I needed to leave. As I put it into gear his buddy on the passenger mouth some expletives and said you better go. (Not the words he said, ruder-cruder and more indignant)
NOW, I ain't no LEO but I saw where this was an issue for me. As for the LEO, he order the citizen who was compliant, then the officer feared for his safety upon the citizen obeying directives. Smells of law suit to me and should be prosecuted as intent to do bodily harm. (Check it out in SC Law. Lived there for 25 years)
I had a similar experience on the NYS Thruway rest stop. He was smoking while fueling-up his car. I asked him to put it out and he told me where to go. I simply reached-over and hit the emergency power-off button. Now he can explain to someone else.