corneileous
Active member
That's cool that its removable. The one on the beretta works like a little switch.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Haven't considered a Glock. Not puttin' them down or nothin', I just don't like the idea of only relying just on a trigger safety.
There's plenty of other guns I'd like to consider but since the safety is only in the trigger, they either have too long, too hard or both of a trigger pull.
I stopped at another place yesterday and got to check out that little Beretta Nano 9mm. Nice little pistol just like I had figured it was but, no saftey.
I'm just curious though, what is it about your Glock that makes it your primary carry over the Ruger?
Are you comparing the Glock to the Ruger LC9s or the SR9c.
The Glock just seems to fit my hand a little better; I def am more accurate with the G43 vs the Ruger(not bad with either...though). The G43 has less recoil than the Ruger also.
Are you comparing the Glock to the Ruger LC9s or the SR9c.
THe LC9s is small and light so I can see that but since we have a Glock 26 and a SR9c I prefer the Ruger.
Yes....I used to carry a Ruger LC9s but prefer my Glock 43 over it.
Well, there she is. Now I just gotta take it out and break it in. Bought a 50 round box of 115 grain Winchesters and a box of 145 grain Browning target rounds and a box of the 150 grain fed HST's and browning jhp to test for carry anmo.
I've been buyin a lot from sportsmans guide.
You probably paid ~$0.30/round for target ammo and ~$1.20/round for the HST. That's 50% more for target ammo and 200% more for the HST than you need to.
I probably did but the target rounds I bought for my 40 beretta, I only gave about 33 bucks for box of a hundred at Walmart.
The fed HST's for that same gun, they were about 25 bucks or so for 20 at sportsmans guide whereas at Academy Sports they were almost 30 for a box of 20.
I probably didn't get the best bang for my buck but I saved a little bit at the time.
I'm sure there's probably a whole slew of cheaper places online that I have yet to find.
Just look at the links I posted, especially www.ammoseek.com.
Will do. Browsed it a little but gotta figure out how to use the site...
My preference is with the Storm. YMMV. I suggest finding a range that rents guns and trying all 3.Stuck between those three for conceal carry. I already have a full size PX4 in a 40 but because of its size, conceal carry on me is out of the question with this gun. Tried it the other day with an Alien Gear 3.0 IWB holster and it just didn't work out.
I haven't got to handle the little beretta yet, hopefully get to this weekend at a big bass pro I'll be going to but I have handled the two Rugers. They're nice guns. I just don't know if I want a 9mm with a small number of rounds compared to the other two with larger capacities plus larger ammo.
I realize the lc9 is a single stack but since I'm thinking the combination of all that extra pistol mass and holster mass of my full size that was between me and my jeans, I really don't think the increased width of a much smaller double stack pistol is gonna make much difference from a smaller single stack pistol.
Anybody daily conceal carry either of these three pistols? Pros? Cons?
Thanks.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
My preference is with the Storm. YMMV. I suggest finding a range that rents guns and trying all 3.
Don't know the acronym ymmv ...
[emoji106][emoji106]Your Mileage My Very, meaning your experience and prefrences may be different than mine and that's ok
I agree with you regarding the Storm except I use cargo pants for pocket carry. My CCW prefrence is with the Sig p320 subcompact but that wasn't one of OP's options.
I thought about that but just never looked into it because of the whole ordering, shipping and transferring thing. Figgered I'd have to get a pretty sweet deal to offset the shipping charge and transfer fees.You can always buy your gun of choice online.