Deanimator
New member
I keep hearing this, but I NEVER see any quantifiable proof to support it. It MIGHT be true, but it's apparently to be taken as religious dogma, even when there's abundant proof to the contrary.kcpauly..without a doubt there are bad cops! That being said ...I am sure the good ones far exceed the number of bad ones.
You MIGHT have a point if you claim that OVERALL, "most" cops are "good", but even that would have to be very heavily qualified. In places like Chicago and New Orleans, the DOCUMENTED evidence points to there not only NOT being a "vast" majority of "good" cops, but not even a majority AT ALL.
At the same time, you have to look at the monotonous regularity of supposedly "good" cops supporting the bad, be it in the case of Tony Abbate in Chicago or Daniel Harless in Canton, Ohio. It's hard to find an example of police misconduct (up to and including multiple murders) that DIDN'T involve a coverup by OTHER cops, including those not directly involved. Hence the coverups in the sexual assault of Abner Louima, the beating of Karolina Obrycka, the murder of Kathryn Johnston, the murders on the Danziger Bridge in New Orleans and many, many more. In fact, the coverup of institutional torture in the Chicago PD continues to this very moment, and that dates back to the late '60s or early '70s.
I will freely accept that not ALL cops are criminal. But when you assert that "the good ones far exceed the number of bad ones", I'll need to see some proof. The truth is that's mostly wishful thinking on your part. It MIGHT be true, but you've done nothing to prove it, and I doubt you could.