*Bloodied Image of Zimmerman's Head Released*

funny how news media doesnt show this stuff ... i wonder if this would have blown up so big if this had been released back, i dont know, when it happened? thanks for the post.
 
It is certainly getting quite interesting. Innocent until proven guilty.

What I find quite interesting is that the media outlets are stating how it might be "safer" for Zimmerman to remain in custody. *sigh*
 
Those on this site calling for Zimmerman to be arrested, will not be swayed, unfortunately.
I think, out of all the high profile murders that received a lot of public attention, (casey anthony, oj, etc), this will be the first, and hopefully, last one I actually follow.
 
It is certainly getting quite interesting. Innocent until proven guilty.

What I find quite interesting is that the media outlets are stating how it might be "safer" for Zimmerman to remain in custody. *sigh*

Innocent until proven guilty. His God given constitutional right just as it is ours. I guess the great Rev. Al Sharpton don't include God unless it benefits him.
 
I'm so damned tired of hearing about skittles & canned tea I could scream.
AND quit showing the guys baby pictires. He was over 6 ft. tall.
Tried & convicted by the media and bad press.
 
I'm so damned tired of hearing about skittles & canned tea I could scream.
AND quit showing the guys baby pictires. He was over 6 ft. tall.
Tried & convicted by the media and bad press.

I totally agree! It is a sad day when Americans allow the press corps to try and convict someone. I have been saying to friends, family and anyone else would listen, that there is NO WAY IN HELL Zimmerman can get a fair trial. The media coverage has been so prolific and it reached the far corners of everywhere in the world!
 
I am currently watching the bond trial live on Brighthouse Networks "In Session" channel 1291.
His defense lawyer is shredding the probable cause affidavit.
The investigators are being made to look like idiots!
 
Innocent until proven guilty - only he already admitted he did the act. Now it's just a matter of determining the legality of the act. (That's the issue with the whole "affirmative defense" - once you admit you did it, it actually becomes guilty until proven innocent. The burden moves to YOU to prove what you did was justified.)

We have a few facts:

1. George Zimmerman followed Trayvon Martin, after being told not to by 911 dispatchers.
2. George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin got into a fight.
3. George Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin dead.

We know, after the fact, that Martin was innocent of any wrongdoing in walking around, and was unarmed. Obviously, Zimmerman could still have been "in fear of his life", but after-the-fact we know that the cause for the shooting was not justified. But, based on the circumstances between fact 2 and fact 3, was the shooting itself justified? That's what he has to prove. The fact that his head was bloodied only continues to provide evidence that they were in a fight, not who started it. If Zimmerman started it, his getting his head bloodied may very well have been valid self-defense actions from Martin!

When I took my CHL class, it was made very clear that in both my home state and per Utah law, if you escalate the situation, you lose self-defense as an affirmative defense. To me, it certainly appears that because of fact 1, Zimmerman escalated and therefore should lose the affirmative defense.

Hopefully there is a witness of what happened between fact 1 and fact 2 that can truly clear up any ambiguities about how the confrontation started. Did Martin suddenly turn around and rush Zimmerman? To me, even though Zimmerman "escalated" by following, that would make the shooting justified. Did Zimmerman yell at Martin to stop, and a verbal argument turned physical? That would make it a tough call, but I would argue that would make it unjustified to me (although not "Murder" level - probably a lower Manslaughter.) Did Zimmerman pull his gun before the fight, and Martin responded to the gun being pulled by attacking? Totally unjustified, definitely Murder.

We won't know for sure until/unless a witness comes forward.
 
Do we know for a fact the Zimmerman continued to follow Martin after the 911 operator told him to stop? The tape I heard indicated when he was told to stop following he said "ok". What proof do you have he continued to follow?
 
To me self defense is if ur fearing for ur life. Weather u provoked or not. Who's to say if he did provoke then started getting pounded and said I'm done plz stop plz stop. Then Martin didn't stop well he feared for his life !!! This is hypothetically speaking I'm just trying to show another point. Obviously his weapon didn't get pulled until he feared for life or his head would not have got bloodied like this
 
Actually, most of us do care.
This situation could, potentially, happen to any one of us.
Regardless of how the events of that night unfolded, Zimmerman indeed shot Martin and he died from that injury.
Zimmerman has claimed self defense.
Those circumstances could happen to anybody that is carrying a firearm for the purpose os self defense.
You may feel justified in your actions, but you may find yourself tried in the court of public opinion and suddenly be dragged into court to defend your actions.
 
Now see house arrest just tells the world where he will b at all times ******** they damn well better have armed guards watching this mans house now. Unless they allow him to do house arrest at a undisclosed location!!!!
 

New Threads

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
49,531
Messages
610,694
Members
75,032
Latest member
BLACKROCK6
Back
Top