Inform the officer or not when concealed carry?

[Beau]

No, what is telling is the fact that some of you paranoid delusionals apparently either cant READ...or you cant help yourself but to insert your own agenda into someone elses statements so you can make a pitiful attempt to justify your paranoia.

What is really telling is that you are in fact a badge polisher (sorry for the name calling. I just really like this term). You have no respect for the right of the people. If you wan't to waive your rights to make officers feel better or to make their job easier go right ahead. Just don't hold those of us who take our freedoms seriously as being some sort of whacko.

 

[Ruger357SP101]

What is really telling is that you are in fact a badge polisher (sorry for the name calling. I just really like this term).

No need to apologize, friend, I have ZERO respect for you, your type or your thoughts and opinions....so nothing you have to say affects me in the least.

You have no respect for the right of the people.

Youre a liar.
I suggest you READ my posts.
If anyone HERE has no repect for the rights of the people its the gun packers who DISREGARD the RIGHT of business owners who dont want guns on their property.
My waiving MY rights is of NO concern to YOU or anyone else on this forum, nor does it have ANY effect on anyone elses rights.
You need to try this paranoid BS propaganda with someone whos as deluded as yourself...maybe they'll fall for it.

If you wan't to waive your rights to make officers feel better or to make their job easier go right ahead. Just don't hold those of us who take our freedoms seriously as being some sort of whacko.

Plain stupidity.
Cops are to know the LAW...not that one guy allowed a search.

As I said, you need to try this with someone who might only have 4 brain cells firing.

 

[Treo]

:biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin: Wow , just wow

 

[NavyLCDR]

:biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin: Wow , just wow

I agree!

BRAVO! BRAVO! What a performance!

 

[Ruger357SP101]

:biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin: Wow , just wow

What I cant figure out is why any self respecting gun rights forum owner would allow your type to taint his website and what it should stand for.

Even the NRA and other legitimate gun rights activist groups dont advocate bad behavior or trampling on the rights of non gun owners the way you and some others do here.
You are an open sore on the gun rights/2nd Amendment cause and if the owner of this forum understood the damage your type does for our cause theyd ban you and keep your nonsense off this site.

 

[Ruger357SP101]

I agree!

BRAVO! BRAVO! What a performance!

Of course you agree.
Facts and common sense mean nothing to some of you.
Which is precisely the reason your type does more damage for second amendment rights than good.

Tell us...is it ok for YOU to violate some business owners rights who posts a gunbuster sign so you can exercise your rights by carrying onto his private property anyway?

What the hell makes YOUR rights any more important than HIS?
Some of you here deserve having your rights infringed, quite frankly.

 

[NavyLCDR]

Of course you agree.
Facts and common sense mean nothing to some of you.
Which is precisely the reason your type does more damage for second amendment rights than good.

Tell us...is it ok for YOU to ignore some business owners rights who posts a gunbuster sign so you can exercise your rights by carrying in anyway?

What the hell makes YOUR rights any more important than HIS?
Some of you here deserve having your rights infringed, quite frankly.

I would put you on my ignore list, but you're just too damn funny! :sarcastic:

 

[Ruger357SP101]

I would put you on my ignore list, but you're just too damn funny! :sarcastic:

And I certainly wont put you on ignore because I enjoy exposing your idiocy and hypocrisy for all the readers here to see.

Tell us...is it ok for YOU to violate some business owners rights who posts a gunbuster sign so you can exercise your rights by carrying onto his private property anyway?

 

[Griffworks]

It's required in Arkansas, so I definitely would here or if I were visiting/passing thru a state that also requires it. I've only been pulled over once in a state that didn't require it and did so anyhow, out of respect for the officer. No issues there and he didn't write me the speeding ticket that I deserved. I'm likely to do so even if not required.

 

[NavyLCDR]

Tell us...is it ok for YOU to violate some business owners rights who posts a gunbuster sign so you can exercise your rights by carrying onto his private property anyway?

Concealed is concealed and doesn't infringe upon anybody's rights.

 

[Ruger357SP101]

Concealed is concealed and doesn't infringe upon anybody's rights.

Right...whod have guesses a rule breaker would believe that crap.
I guess the same applies to your marriage.
If your wife doesnt find out that you cheated, then its not really cheating, is it?
If the store doesnt miss whatever you stole, its not really stealing, is it?
If the IRS doesnt catch that illegal deduction you took, then its not really 'illegal', is it?

You know whats scary about this?
You and your ilk are making it VERY clear that Im right about you...you only obey what you have to and to hell with any rules you can get away with breaking.

By all means, please keep talking because by the time Im done here there wont be many left here who will have any respect for you whatsoever...as no decent gun owner should, given your hypocrisy and blatant lack of concern about the rights of OTHERs.

 

[NavyLCDR]

Link Removed

Age
45
Join Date
02-15-2011
Total Posts
148
Likes Received Likes Received
10
Likes Given Likes Given
6

Link Removed

Join Date
01-16-2009
Total Posts
845
Likes Received Likes Received
182
Likes Given Likes Given
77

I'm not concerned about my popularity or level of respect.

 

[Ruger357SP101]

I'm not concerned about my popularity or level of respect.

I certainly hope not...you clearly have ZERO respect for anyone other than yourself and the RIGHTS of others.

 

[Treo]

You are a murderer, you are a hater you are a life destroyer

I'm not concerned about my popularity or level of respect.

 

[Deanimator]

The cop doesnt know you, friend.

Nor do I know him.

I don't let strangers rifle through my belongings, certainly unless REQUIRED to by law.

 

[Deanimator]

REALLY?
so when was the last time one of those fine folks put their lives on the line during a traffic stop ?
When was the last time one of them was shot dead trying to enforce the law?

If youre going to make a point, at least try to keep your arguments coherent and on topic.

Utterly irrelevant.

I don't care if you hide in a barrel during a rodeo.

I don't care if you killed Godzilla with a plastic c ration spoon.

I'm not waiving ANY right I have for your convenience.

 

[Deanimator]

And you might want to get off the dope so the paranoia might go away sometime soon.

That's a pretty obtuse way of saying you have no lucid or rational response to my well founded objections to your repeated attacks on the Bill of Rights.

 

[Deanimator]

What I cant figure out is why any self respecting gun rights forum owner would allow your type to taint his website and what it should stand for.

I'd say that given the indulgence he's shown to an ongoing AHSA false flag operation here, he's obviously a pretty tolerant person.

Of course, the BEST way to discredit anti-gunners is to just let them talk.

You may continue.

 

[Deanimator]

And I certainly wont put you on ignore because I enjoy exposing your idiocy and hypocrisy for all the readers here to see.

Tell us...is it ok for YOU to violate some business owners rights who posts a gunbuster sign so you can exercise your rights by carrying onto his private property anyway?

Juvenile ad hominems have failed you in this debate.

Changing the subject will serve you no better.

But I suppose AHSA has nothing else in its bag of [inept] tricks.

 

[Ruger357SP101]

Juvenile ad hominems have failed you in this debate.

Please.
There is no debate here, friend.
Just some rule breakers who have no respect for anyone rights but their own.

Changing the subject will serve you no better.

Pick any subject you want. Lets see if you can even remotely make any semblance of a case.