US District Court (Maryland) rules AR-15s "dangerous and unusual"

[captbubba]

US District Court (Maryland) rules AR-15s "dangerous and unusual"

Sounds as stupid as saying that email falls outside the protection of the first amendment.

 

[r1derbike]

Well, I've not vilified a judge before, but this one is a danger to our 2nd amendment, because of her personal agenda (coached by highers-up) and leftist ignorance.

Here goes: This judge is another blatantly stupid puppet. Her thoughts are controlled by the same criminals in our administration. Her actions are controlled by stupid, agenda driven marionette string wielding, neo-Marxist/Alinsky socialists. You may see it in her eyes. You may see the strings, if you look closely.

I left Maryland years ago as the first hints of communist totalitarianism and socialism reared their ugly head. Maryland envelops D.C., and criminal judgements are greeted with clapping and back-slapping, with a few attaboy and attagirls thrown-in in the state, with thank you money changing hands under the tables.

Maryland and D.C. are teeming with political and judicial criminals. Sworn to uphold the Constitution, but instead of that, they are destroying it and personal freedom.

Clock keeps ticking, and these "judgements" are coming in waves. It's too late to expect the ballot box to change anything, and I dread the coming war of the world.

 

[BC1]

I wonder what line of the Constitution she read that bans AR-15????? I did a wordsearch and couldn't find AR-15 in the Constitution...

For that matter the constitution doesn't allow denial of gun rights to kids. Makes no distinction between kids and adults.

 

[sdprof]

AR-15 style firearms - unusual? Hardly. Over a quarter million were made in 2010 (last year I saw data for), and that number most likely has gone up noticeably in 2011-2014.

Walk into a WallyWorld that sells guns - bet at least one out of every 10 on their rack is a Modern Sporting Rifle. Or one out of 2 in some stores.

Dangerous? No more so than any other rifle, less than some. How do the cosmetic features make it more dangerous. How do features that allow a person to better maintain control of their weapon, make them better able to hit what they're shooting at, make it more dangerous (other than to the intended target)? How does a limit of 10 rounds in the magazine make it less dangerous, except to the criminal target who doesn't follow the law.

Judge needs to climb down from her ivory tower once in a while.

 

[ezkl2230]

AR-15 style firearms - unusual? Hardly. Over a quarter million were made in 2010 (last year I saw data for), and that number most likely has gone up noticeably in 2011-2014.

Walk into a WallyWorld that sells guns - bet at least one out of every 10 on their rack is a Modern Sporting Rifle. Or one out of 2 in some stores.

Dangerous? No more so than any other rifle, less than some. How do the cosmetic features make it more dangerous. How do features that allow a person to better maintain control of their weapon, make them better able to hit what they're shooting at, make it more dangerous (other than to the intended target)? How does a limit of 10 rounds in the magazine make it less dangerous, except to the criminal target who doesn't follow the law.

Judge needs to climb down from her ivory tower once in a while.

The problem is with the judge's basic assumptions, based on faulty data. She calls them unusual because, according to HER data, no doubt provided by Bloomberg, Brady and others, all of these thousands of ARs represent less than 3% of the national arsenal and ownership is concentrated in the hands of less than 1% of the population. If the ownership was spread out through a larger percentage of the population, then, there would be nothing unusual about them.

Bad data. And she isn't interested in seeing good data.

 

[whodat2710]

AR-15 style firearms - unusual? Hardly. Over a quarter million were made in 2010 (last year I saw data for), and that number most likely has gone up noticeably in 2011-2014.

Walk into a WallyWorld that sells guns - bet at least one out of every 10 on their rack is a Modern Sporting Rifle. Or one out of 2 in some stores.

Dangerous? No more so than any other rifle, less than some. How do the cosmetic features make it more dangerous. How do features that allow a person to better maintain control of their weapon, make them better able to hit what they're shooting at, make it more dangerous (other than to the intended target)? How does a limit of 10 rounds in the magazine make it less dangerous, except to the criminal target who doesn't follow the law.

Judge needs to climb down from her ivory tower once in a while.

According to her, all the AR-15 style guns in America are owned by half a dozen guys in Nebraska.

 

[Makarovii]

Here is the defendant's open letter to the activist judge: Link Removed

 

[r1derbike]

So what are everybody's plans if this goes all the way to the Supreme Court and is upheld? Is it time to at least start thinking about that now?

I'd definitely put a bright push pin on the state of a U.S. map. Along with all the other bright pins, and those to come, it might be prudent to start thinking...

 

[CharlesMorrison]

Link Removed

 

[SR9]

Maryland is a liberal progressive state run by an a hole (O'Malley) and will not change in 2014 or 2016 I'm betting. And this guy wants us to vote for him to be President of the US?

 

[Farmhood]

Maryland is a liberal progressive state run by an a hole (O'Malley) and will not change in 2014 or 2016 I'm betting. And this guy wants us to vote for him to be President of the US?

This guy is so bad y'all would want Barry back...he is that BAD! If he became President you would take a pair of plyers and pull a tooth just so you would stop thinking how horrible things have become....

sinful nature is always hostile to God....