No, not what you think. I spelt ridiculous to be sarcastic.Wow. That is really impressive for a guy that can't even spell ridiculous. The truth of the matter is that the poster asked an open ended question about shipping a firearm. The "safe" answer to that question is that the frame as described by the poster, constitutes a firearm and all applicable shipping regulations are in effect even though this portion of the gun cannot by any stretch of the imagination fire a cartridge. The poster made no mention of who he was shipping to or any of the circumstances regarding the shipment. I think that you are the guy that you warned the poster about, an arrogant condescending boob that is trying to give legal advice, while in reality he lacks the ability to comprehend his own cut and paste answer.
Says the guy who postedWow. That is really impressive for a guy that can't even spell ridiculous. The truth of the matter is that the poster asked an open ended question about shipping a firearm. The "safe" answer to that question is that the frame as described by the poster, constitutes a firearm and all applicable shipping regulations are in effect even though this portion of the gun cannot by any stretch of the imagination fire a cartridge. The poster made no mention of who he was shipping to or any of the circumstances regarding the shipment. I think that you are the guy that you warned the poster about, an arrogant condescending boob that is trying to give legal advice, while in reality he lacks the ability to comprehend his own cut and paste answer.
In the eyes of the DEA the receiver constitutes the gun even though to those of us that know guns the idea is ludicrous.
No, not what you think. I spelt ridiculous to be sarcastic.
I went looking for the answer as I had enough data here to research, therefore allowing me to search with different words.
There are ways to lower myself to your word-smithing to belittle me, but i will just let it go as you arent worth my fricking time.
Have a nice night.[/]
Well don't let the rich kid stand between you and that cure for cancer you have been working on. Arrogant sarcastic boob? If that was one word, your picture would be the dictionary definition.
Says the guy who posted
DEA has nothing to do with shipping of guns.
Just go away now little kid, we got this. Or go play freeze tag on a highway, you are not needed for advice or retort. Move alongNo, not what you think. I spelt ridiculous to be sarcastic.
I went looking for the answer as I had enough data here to research, therefore allowing me to search with different words.
There are ways to lower myself to your word-smithing to belittle me, but i will just let it go as you arent worth my fricking time.
Have a nice night.[/]
Well don't let the rich kid stand between you and that cure for cancer you have been working on. Arrogant sarcastic boob? If that was one word, your picture would be the dictionary definition.
Rick Kid you are an arrogant condescending boob that is trying to give legal advice, while in reality lacks the ability to comprehend anything
Just go away now little kid, we got this. Or go play freeze tag on a highway, you are not needed for advice or retort. Move along
I have no intention of going anywhere. I will not leave this forum in the hands of people like you. Count on my continued presence regardless of whether you feel it's needed.
Wow. That is really impressive for a guy that can't even spell ridiculous. The truth of the matter is that the poster asked an open ended question about shipping a firearm. The "safe" answer to that question is that the frame as described by the poster, constitutes a firearm and all applicable shipping regulations are in effect even though this portion of the gun cannot by any stretch of the imagination fire a cartridge. The poster made no mention of who he was shipping to or any of the circumstances regarding the shipment. I think that you are the guy that you warned the poster about, an arrogant condescending boob that is trying to give legal advice, while in reality he lacks the ability to comprehend his own cut and paste answer.
You gave a totally ignorant answer. When the real information was posted, you get pissed because it shows the ignorance in your answer.
The FFL i am sending it to out of state said my data was correct.Really, you might want to review the thread and see that it was your partner in clowning that was citing statutes and quoting laws. As I see it all of your buddy's quotations were off target.
LCDR is a very respectful rank Shipmate.I am very moved that you are in touch with my emotions. That is really sweet and don't be surprised if you get a valentines day card from me. However, a cut and paste answer from a government website does not constitute real wisdom in my neck of the woods. I gave a simple, direct answer to the question that was asked. The frame, even though barren of the parts needed to fire a round, is governed by the rules that govern the shipment of a complete firearm. Use caution when shipping gun parts, because a shooters notion of what constitutes a firearm is very different from the governments idea of the essential parts necessary to fire a round. Now if that is beyond your comprehension, you probably won't be making admiral any time soon.
Ps. I am very proud to say my answer did not contain a single cut and paste.
Legally, to ship the receiver, you must go thru a dealer. In the eyes of the DEA the receiver constitutes the gun even though to those of us that know guns the idea is ludicrous.
I gave a simple, direct answer to the question that was asked. The frame, even though barren of the parts needed to fire a round, is governed by the rules that govern the shipment of a complete firearm.
Ps. I am very proud to say my answer did not contain a single cut and paste.
The FFL i am sending it to out of state said my data was correct.
So if they are incorrect, show your empiracle data. I can handle being corrected, name calling doesnt go well though.