didn't someone say the state paper is very anti-gun leaning to begin with?
if we can get past Martin, i think it would have a chance. I'd love to be able to carry my weapons openly that are too bulky to conceal easily.
I'd love to carry my S&W Model 15 everywhere I go!
didn't someone say the state paper is very anti-gun leaning to begin with?
if we can get past Martin, i think it would have a chance. I'd love to be able to carry my weapons openly that are too bulky to conceal easily.
Wasn't he behind S308?I'm afraid there is no getting around Martin. He isn't going to bend one bit. I have been back and forth with him since this bill was first introduced and he keeps coming up with some new reason why NOT to pass S115 with each email.
I strongly support our CWP law so that law abiding citizens, with minimal training and a background check, can exercise their 2nd amendment rights."
Oooh... I'll tell ya... That is what is wrong with all of the asshats in public office and it infuriates me to no end.
I am so fvcking tired of tools like this who treat us like peons, like "they" in office are granting us PERMISSION to exercise our God Given Right!
I'm getting close to the edge of what I will tolerate from these morons.
Link Removed
I am dead serious...
Link Removed
Sent from behind Enemy Lines.
I'm afraid there is no getting around Martin. He isn't going to bend one bit. I have been back and forth with him since this bill was first introduced and he keeps coming up with some new reason why NOT to pass S115 with each email.
Sounds like a law that, in the case that there may be some federal law banning any particular firearm, only allows the feds to enforce it. Sounds pro-2A to me. They probably passed it so that if the federal gov't passes a gun ban, our state's law enforcement can say "sorry boys, we can't enforce that. It's against our state laws".It seems to me that S. 885 is just as relevant and important to us in conjunction with S. 115.
Link Removed
Are any of you aware of any way that S. 885 could infringe on our 2A rights?
is it just me or is it simply adding those 2 underlined words to the already existing law? if so, seems minute and not hurting anything 2A.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?