Iowa State Senator Punishing Gun Owners


At what point do we as gun owners get off out butts and get these people out of office?
 
whatever happen to logic?

A drunken bum intent on beating his estranged spouse isn't going to give a damn about a protective order. Instead, the court should give her a gun so she can shoot the guy on sight.
 
misleading information

It's a bit late for this thread, but thought if anyone stumbled on it, they would be mislead. No rights were taken away with the bill, only permission for the leo's to enforce the law. It came after a man who was charged with spousal abuse signed an agreement to surrender his weapons while going through this difficulty. He never did surrender his weapons even after agreeing to do so, and the leo's had no authority to take the weapons from him. He later murdered his wife, thus bringing this bill into existance so a leo could take the weapons if he fails to turn them over. This may effect a lot of innocent people, but the purpose is to try to prevent such a tragedy. Only in a perfect world where everyone follows a moral code (aka the bible)
could we exist without written regulations. The larger a country's population becomes the more difficult it is to get by without regulations. Unfortunately, many innocent people suffer from the abuse of a few. This is my opinion and the info was taken from the site at the beginning of this thread.
http://www.ammoland.com/2010/02/24/iowa-gun-bill-takes-away-your-guns-charges-you-for-doing-so/
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
49,544
Messages
611,261
Members
74,959
Latest member
defcon
Back
Top