I admire a young man who takes the initiative to address an issue with passion and vigor.
But anyone wanting to aid the advancement of 2A rights ought to abide by the "first, do no harm" rule.
Let's assume that the experiment is a success, i.e., there is a significant decrease in crime in the experimental neighborhoods that can't be attributed to anything other than that the guns that were distributed.
The problem is that such a successful experiment will be proof that:
1. Crime can be significantly reduced by limiting law abiding gun owners to one-shot shot guns.
2. Crime can be significantly reduced by limiting gun ownership to be people who pass a background check, take a safety and tactical course and have special need for a firearm because of high crime in their area.
The Bradys will probably fund this study when they hear about it.
Link Removed
But anyone wanting to aid the advancement of 2A rights ought to abide by the "first, do no harm" rule.
Let's assume that the experiment is a success, i.e., there is a significant decrease in crime in the experimental neighborhoods that can't be attributed to anything other than that the guns that were distributed.
The problem is that such a successful experiment will be proof that:
1. Crime can be significantly reduced by limiting law abiding gun owners to one-shot shot guns.
2. Crime can be significantly reduced by limiting gun ownership to be people who pass a background check, take a safety and tactical course and have special need for a firearm because of high crime in their area.
The Bradys will probably fund this study when they hear about it.
Link Removed