Federal Judge Upholds Gun Ban at Atlanta airport


New member
Link Removed

I could see this setting a precedence around the country. Story below. I also posted it under the Georgia page.

ATLANTA — A federal judge on Monday upheld a gun ban at the world's busiest airport, dealing a blow to gun rights groups who argued a new Georgia law authorized them to carry weapons in certain parts of the Atlanta airport.

U.S. District Judge Marvin Shoob expressed concern that allowing guns at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport could cause significant economic damage and could be a "serious threat to public safety and welfare."

His decision rejected a request by GeorgiaCarry.org that would have temporarily allowed gun owners to carry their weapons in the airport until his final ruling on the gun ban — a challenge that could likely last months.

The legal showdown erupted when the state law that allows people with a concealed weapons permit to carry guns into restaurants, state parks and on public transportation took effect on July 1.

City officials quickly declared the airport a "gun-free zone" and warned that anyone carrying a gun there would be arrested.

GeorgiaCarry.org sued the city and the airport, claiming that the airport qualifies as mass transportation under the new state law. Attorney John Monroe told the judge repeatedly that no law makes it a crime for residents with permits to bring their guns into terminals, parking lots and other unsecured areas.

A U.S. Supreme Court ruling this year clarified that the Second Amendment guarantees individuals the right to own working guns, and struck down a Washington D.C. metro ban on private gun ownership.

Gov. Sonny Perdue, who signed the bill into law in May, supports the lawsuit. The Republican suggested that his own wife might want to carry a firearm for long walks between the parking lot and the airport's terminal.

City officials have angrily fired back, arguing that allowing some residents to carry guns at the airport could pose a dire threat to the millions of passengers it serves each year. Even an accidental firearm discharge, they say, could cause mayhem.

"First, you're going to have a stampede," said Robert Kennedy, the airport's assistant general manager.

Meanwhile, airport officials are quietly devising a backup plan.

They have asked the Transportation Security Administration to amend the airport's federal security program so that guns are banned in all areas, including certain parking facilities.

TSA officials said the agency is reviewing the request, the first such appeal it has ever received.

Rep. Bennie Thompson, the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, has also urged the agency to strengthen its restrictions and warned that Congress could intervene if national regulations are not adopted.

The judge's ruling was a defeat for GeorgiaCarry.org, a two-year-old group that has won a string of victories reversing city and county firearm restrictions around the state.

But state Rep. Tim Bearden, a Republican who co-sponsored the law, said it was only a temporary setback.

"In the long run, the Constitution always prevails," said Bearden, a former police officer who wore a yellow tie imprinted with the document's words. "At least, it's supposed to."

The solution to this is simple. Whenever you go to an airport that bans guns anywhere on the premises, demand that you get an armed airport security officer to escort you around. I'm sure they won't mind responding to hundreds of requests like this a day.

I sent the following email to Security at Hartsfield-Jackson. Link Removed.

Can I get an armed airport policeman to escort me at all airport facilities, including the parking lot? As I will no longer be able to carry a firearm anywhere on the premises, I assume that Hartsfield-Jackson must be planning to provide personalized security for each patron, comparable to every person being able to provide for their own self-defense.

However, it's possible I just don't see them. While walking through the parking garages and going into restrooms there are times when I do not see any airport police, but I assume since security is Hartsfield-Jackson's top priority, they must have invisible officers ready to respond to any emergency.

Also, I'll need to reserve a drop-box where I can keep my firearm, so that when I leave Hartsfield-Jackson, I can retrieve it before venturing out into Atlanta on my way home.

Last edited:
The headline is, of course, incorrect. The judge did not decide the matter at all.

All he did was to deny GeorgiaCarry request for an immediate injunction to prevent the airport from implementing their plan to arrest persons legally carrying weapons while the matter was litigated.

The question will not be settled for some time.
Last edited:
Toreskha,that is a great idea!
Truth be told,I feel that we all should make it plainly known th whatever authority is making and enforcing the rules anywhere that we are not allowed to go armed that if anything happens to us or a loved one that they WILL be held responsible for not providing adequate security,which IS their responsibility because they do not allow us to provide it for ourselves.I have no problem doing it.
Nevertheless, state issues should be settled in state courts, not federal ones. This was the wrong decision decided in the wrong court.

New Threads

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Latest member